The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti mouse antibody

Manufactured by LI COR
Sourced in United States

The Anti-mouse antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and analysis of mouse proteins in various experimental techniques. It binds specifically to mouse-derived proteins, allowing for their identification and quantification in samples. The core function of this antibody is to provide a tool for researchers to investigate mouse-related biological systems and processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using anti mouse antibody

1

Cellular Signaling Pathway Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Choline chloride (Salus Nutra Inc., Xian, China), DL-malic acid (Salus Nutra Inc., Xian, China), commercial chitin (Carbosynth, China), sucralfate (Combiphar, Bandung, Indonesia), ethanol, pure 99.5% (Merck Millipore-Sigma Aldrich, USA), ethyl ether (Merck Millipore-Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (BrataChem, Bandung, Indonesia), Bouin solution, distilled water (BrataChem, Bandung, Indonesia), mouse monoclonal IgG1 NF-kappaB p65 antibody (Santacruz Biotechnology Inc., K2320, Shanghai, China), β-actin antibody (Thermo Scientific MA5-15739, Singapore), anti-mouse antibody (Li-Cor C90408-07, PT. Elo Karsa Utama, Jakarta, Indonesia), bovine serum albumin (BSA Protein, Thermo Scientific, Singapore), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel 15% (Merck Millipore-Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA), polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Merck Millipore-Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA), phosphate buffer saline-tween 20 (PBST) 0.1%, protein ladder (Thermo Scientific, Singapore), running buffer, transfer buffer, lysis buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized RPPA Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RPPA analysis was performed using a procedure previously optimized and validated [61 (link)]. Briefly, cell lysates obtained from 800,000 cells (ø 10 cm Petri dishes) were solubilized in 4×SDS loading buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy) and heated for 5 minutes at 95°C. Samples were spotted in duplicates onto nitrocellulose-coated glass slides (Grace Bio-labs, Bend, OR, USA) using a microarraying robot (MicroGrid 610, Digilab, Marlborough, MA, USA). The printed slides were blocked and incubated overnight at 4°C with shaking with the specific primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 3) (Cell Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). β-actin was included as a house-keeping protein to control protein loading. After incubation with infrared secondary antibodies (800 CW LI-COR anti-rabbit antibody and 700 CW LI-COR anti-mouse antibody), the slides were scanned with a Licor Odyssey scanner (LI-COR, Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) at 21 μm resolution at 700 and 800 nm. The fluorescent data were processed with GenePix Pro-6 Microarray Image Analysis software (Molecular Services Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Protein signals were determined with background subtraction and normalization to the internal housekeeping targets using an RPP analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiplexed Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysates were solubilised in 4 × SDS loading buffer and heated for 5 min at 95 °C. RPPA assays of the components of the NF-κB, PI3K–Akt, MAPK, JAK–STAT–c-Sr, and inflammasome (NALP1) signalling pathways were performed as previously described [10 (link)].
Briefly, samples were spotted in duplicates onto a nitrocellulose-coated glass slide (Grace Bio-labs, Bend, OR, USA) using a microarray robot (MicroGrid 610, Digilab, Marlborough, MA, USA). The printed slides were blocked and incubated with specific primary antibodies listed in Table 2 (Cell Signalling) overnight at 4 °C, with shaking. Β actin was included as a housekeeping protein, to control protein loading. After incubation with infrared secondary antibodies (800 CW LI-COR anti-rabbit antibody and 700 CW LI-COR anti-mouse antibody), the slides were scanned with a Licor Odyssey scanner (LI-COR, Biosciences) at 21 um resolution at 700 nm and 800 nm. The fluorescent data were processed with GenePix Pro-6 Microarray Image Analysis software (Molecular Services Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Protein signals were determined with background subtraction and normalisation to the internal housekeeping targets using the RPP analyser [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Apoptosis Signaling Pathway Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-active caspase-8 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, USA), rabbit anti FAS, and anti FADD antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), murine activating anti-CD95/FAS (50 ng/ml) from upstate signaling, rabbit anti-AIF IgG (Sigma-Aldrich), mouse anti-p53 antibody (Millipore), Rabbit anti-Flag (Thermo/Fisher Scientific), rabbit anti-nur77 IgG (Santa Cruz), mouse anti–β-actin (Abcam). The following secondary antibodies were used: Infrared dye 800cw goat, anti-rabbit antibody, Infrared dye 680cw goat, anti-mouse antibody (Licor), Rhodamine redX anti-rabbit antibody (Life Technologies), cy5 anti-murine antibody (Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Phosphorylation Analysis in Fungal Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mutants and Guy11 strains were cultured in liquid CM for 2 days and then the total proteins were isolated from vegetative hyphae as described by Bruno et al. (2004 (link)). For protein phosphorylation analysis, the proteinase inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete; Sigma‐Aldrich) was added. The intensity of the signal corresponding to phosphorylated MoMps1 was detected by binding of an antiphospho‐p44/42MAP kinase antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), and the anti‐p44/42 MAP kinase antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) was used as control. For green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐tagged protein detection, samples were analysed by 8% SDS‐PAGE followed by western blotting with the anti‐GFP antibody (Abmart) and the anti‐mouse antibody (LI‐COR, IRDye), followed by detection using the ODYSSEY infrared imaging system (application software v. 2.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibody Validation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-® actin (Abcam, UK). α/β-Tubulin Antibody (Cell signaling), Anti-cyclin B1 (Millipore, Germany), Anti-phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro MPM-2 Antibody (Millipore, Germany). The following secondary antibodies were used: Infrared dye 800cw goat, anti-rabbit antibody, Infrared dye 680cw goat, anti-mouse antibody (Licor, USA), Rhodamine redX antirabbit antibody (life technologies), cy5 anti-murine antibody (Abcam, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!