The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanodrop device

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The NanoDrop device is a compact and easy-to-use instrument designed for the quantification and analysis of small-volume samples. It utilizes a patented sample retention technology that requires only 1-2 microliters of sample to perform measurements. The NanoDrop device can accurately measure the concentration and purity of nucleic acids, proteins, and other biomolecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

97 protocols using nanodrop device

1

DNA Extraction and Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of ten incubation samples and five in situ samples (2–4 L/sample) were subject to DNA extraction according to the phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol method [28 ]. Purified DNA was checked with a NanoDrop device (ND2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and the DNA concentration fluorometrically quantified [29 (link)] with QuantiFluor dsDNA system (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). DNA of in situ samples were obtained only for 5 m of site SEATS and 0 and 25 m of site D001, while DNA extraction failed for other two samples due to being stored in RNAlater. 12C/13C-DNA of Escherichia coli was obtained as described by Dumont et al. [30 (link)] as a positive standard after incubation with 13C-labeled D-Glc as the sole-carbon-source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nucleic Acid Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using the modified CTAB method [44 ]. Total RNA was extracted using an RNX-Plus reagent kit (Cinnagen, Tehran, Iran) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the quantity and concentration of the RNA and DNA were measured using a Nanodrop device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The integrity and quantity of RNA were evaluated by visual observation of the 28S and 18S rRNA bands on a 1% agarose gel. Then, cDNAs were synthesized using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Germany) according the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA-free total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed using oligo-dT primers (Fermentas). The cDNA samples were stored at -20°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Harvesting and RNA Extraction from Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Growing CS1AN, CS3BE, UVsKO, HACSB, HACSA, and 1306 fibroblasts cells were harvested by scraping and collected by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The extraction of RNA was performed using an RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The concentration of RNA was measured by using a nanodrop device (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). One µg RNA was reverse transcribed using the Moloney murine leukemia virus Reverse Transcriptase (M170B, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). For primer annealing, 1 µg RNA was pre-incubated with 1 µL random hexamer primer p(dN)6 and incubated at 70 °C for 5 min. After annealing, samples were complemented with a reaction mix containing 0.5 µL dNTPs, 0.5 µL RNase inhibitor, 1 µL M-MLV reverse transcriptase, and 5 µL of 5× M-MLV reverse transcription buffer and nuclease-free water up to 25 µL final volume. The reverse transcription was performed for 1 h at 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DNA Extraction from Stool Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was performed directly from the stool samples and the reference S. sonnei and S. flexneri isolates using the QIAamp DNA Stool Minikit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The amount and purity of extracted DNA were measured using a NanoDrop device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of DACone-amino Acid Selectivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell extracts were prepared by sonicating, in 2 mL of PBS 0.5% IGEPAL CA-630 containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (HALT cocktail, Pierce), a pellet of ~300 µL of U2OS cells treated for 2 hr with 2 µM DAC (S)–9, collected by scrapping in cold PBS, followed by centrifugation 30 min at 15,000 RPM at 4 °C. Protein concentration in the supernatant was evaluated using a Nanodrop device (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the extracts diluted at 1 mg/mL with PBS containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. One mg of proteins were then precipitated overnight at –20 °C by addition of 4 volumes of cold acetone followed by centrifugation at 16,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The precipitates were further processed as described for the detection of the DACone-amino acid selectivity. The data presented correspond to two independent experiments (Exp.1 and 2 in Supplementary file 4). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019 (link)) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD033059.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Odontoblastic Marker Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A real-time PCR test was used to detect the expression of odontoblastic markers, including DMP1 and DSPP, at the mRNA level. Hence, 2.5 × 105 cells were seeded and differentiated in each well of a 6-well plate (SPL, Pocheon-si, Korea). RNA was extracted using a kit (Cinnagen, Tehran, Iran). The concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were measured with a nanodrop device (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis kit (SinaClon, Tehran, Iran). A real-time PCR test was performed using the Amplicon kit and RUSH device (Rush, Heidelberg, Germany), and the Actinβ gene was used as an internal control. Primer sequences were also designed using the NCBI reference site (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction from Neonatal Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA were extracted from brain hemispheres, ipsilateral to ligature at 3, 6, 12, or 24 h after HI procedure at P5 or P10 in sex-matched groups and from the right brain hemispheres of age- and time-matched naive animals (details in Supplementary Material). RNA samples at P2 and P15 required for the developmental study were collected in 8 separate pools each of 6 sex-matched animals at both stages (③ in Figure 1). Brain tissues were defrosted in 350 μl lysis buffer from NucleoSpin RNA Plus extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France) and homogeneized using ceramic beads (1.4 mm Ozyme, Montigny le Bretonneaux) in a tissue lyser® (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) for 20 s at 50 hz. Total RNAs extraction was performed using Nucleospin RNA plus kit® according to manufacturer instructions (Macherey-Nagel) in 350 μL and frozen at −80°C. The integrity and quantity of isolated mRNAs were assessed using the 2100 Bio-analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States) and the Nanodrop device (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, United States). See details in Supplementary Material. Pooled samples for microarray study were made with 5 μg of total RNA extracted from 6 ipsilateral hemispheres of sex matched injured or control mice at both ages and all time points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extraction and Quantification of RNA and cDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Buffy coat samples of blood white cells were separated by centrifugation (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). RNA was extracted using RNX-plus Sinacolon Kit (CinnaGen Co., Tehran, Iran) according to the protocol of the producing company. The RNA concentrations were determined by Nanodrop device (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA). All RNA samples had a 260:280 absorbance ratio between 1.9 and 2.1. Then, cDNA was synthesized using SinaClon first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (CinnaGen Co.) according to the protocol of the producing company. Extracted cDNA samples were subjected to quantification by Nanodrop device (Thermo Scientific,, USA), qualification (2% agarose gel), and purity checking (A260/A280). The cDNA was stored at −80°C until subsequent analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of PPARγ and KI67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The levels of PPARγ and KI67 proteins were determined through ELISA after a 48 h of treatment with 1 µM Les236 or co-treatment with Les-236 and 10 µM rosiglitazone or Les-236 and GW9662. These proteins were specifically detected with ELISA and subsequently subjected to quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay, which was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Elabscience Biotechnology, Wuhan, China). Briefly, a 96-well plate was pre-coated with monoclonal antibodies specific to PPARγ and KI67. Standards and the collected cell extracts were added to the wells and incubated for 90 min at 37 °C. Next, the liquid was removed, and biotinylated detection antibodies (100 µL) were added to the cultures for 60 min. We washed the cells three times to remove any unbound substances, and then added horseradish peroxidase-conjugated avidin. The cells were washed again, and 90 µL of substrate solution was added to the wells for 15 min. Then, 50 µL stop solution was added to terminate the reaction and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm; the value obtained was proportional to the amount of PPARγ and KI67, respectively. The total protein concentration was determined in triplicate in each sample by using a Thermo Fisher NanoDrop device.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plasma RNA Isolation and Quality Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to RNA isolation blood samples were thawed on ice, then circulating RNA was isolated from 500 µL plasma samples using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of the RNA was analyzed using the Nanodrop device (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!