The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

In cell analyzer 2000 system

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The In Cell Analyzer 2000 system is a high-content screening platform that enables automated image acquisition and analysis of cellular samples. It provides quantitative data on various cellular parameters, including morphology, protein localization, and signaling pathways.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using in cell analyzer 2000 system

1

Immunostaining of bEnd.3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescent staining was performed according to the standard procedures. bEnd.3 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate. Cell–cell junctions were allowed to establish over 2 days. After treatment of sAβO42 or ACMs, cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 4% PFA for 20 min. Then, cells were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 20 min on ice after being washed 3 times with PBS for 5 min. Cells were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies (1:500) were applied in 2% BSA in PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Cells were then washed 3 times with PBS for 5 min. Secondary antibodies (1:1000) conjugated to fluorescent probes (Alexa Fluor 488 Rabbit Anti-Goat IgG (H+L) and Alexa Fluor 594 Rabbit Anti-Goat IgG (H+L)) were applied for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed 4 times with PBS for 5 min per wash and images were taken with a IN Cell Analyzer 2000 system (General Electric, Bradenton, FL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunolabeling of Microglia and Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For BV-2 microglia staining, cells were washed, fixed, permeabilized, and blocked. After that, cells were incubated at 4°C overnight with the primary antibodies. The next day, cells were incubated secondary antibodies and DAPI. Finally, the samples were imaged using the In Cell Analyzer 2000 system (GE Healthcare).
For mouse brain staining, serial coronal cryosections (20 μm thick) of cortex of each brain were prepared according to the previous protocol. Briefly, after being fixed, washed, permeabilized, and blocked, sections were incubated with primary antibody. After that, sections were further incubated with secondary antibody and DAPI solution. Sections were imaged by a confocal microscope TCS SP5 (Lecia, Solms, Germany). Cell numbers were calculated by counting of per random microscopic field in a blinded fashion. Data are expressed as the percentage of CD16/32+ or CD206+ cells to the Iba-1+ cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Investigating NK Cell Morphology under HRG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To clarify the effects of HRG on NK cell morphology, the cells were incubated with HRG, HSA, or HBSS at 1 μmol/L for 4 hours after overnight stimulation with IL‐2‐containing RPMI1640. Cell shape was observed by calcein staining as described previously.18 An IN Cell Analyzer 2000 System (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) was used for observation. The data were analyzed using IN Cell Investigator Version 1.62 (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Apoptotic Morphological Analysis in Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEY and A2780 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a cell density of 4 × 103 cells per well, cultured overnight, and treated with GE diluted in the medium containing 0.5% FBS for 24 h. The suspension was removed, and the cells were fixed with 4% PFA (Sigma) for 20 min. 1 μg/mL of Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) was added and incubated for 15 min in the dark. Apoptotic morphological changes in the nucleus were observed using an In Cell Analyzer 2000 System (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden). The experiments in this assay were performed three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Stem Cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect protein expression levels in both undifferentiated and differentiated cells, the monoclonal antibody TRA-1-60 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as the primary antibody to assess surface antigens on the NT2 cells and the changes that occur upon differentiation induced by RS1S CHCL3 extract. Following the treatment, cells were washed and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (20 min) at room temperature. Fixed cells were incubated with blocking buffer (3% FBS in 1× Phosphate buffer saline (PBS)) for 40 min, and then the cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with TRA-1-60 primary antibody diluted 1:100 in blocking buffer. After incubation, the cells were washed 3 times with 1× PBS and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature on a shaker with FITC-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgM (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) secondary antibody diluted 1:500 in blocking buffer, and the cells were then washed 2 times with 1× PBS. For nuclei staining, the cells were incubated with 1× PBS containing 0.5 μg/ml Hoechst (Sigma) for 5 min. The stained cells were imaged using an In Cell Analyzer 2000 System (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). For the negative control, conditions were kept the same, except that the primary antibody was omitted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cell Junctions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on 96-well plates, and mature junctions were allowed to establish over 2 days. When the experiment was done, cells were washed once for 1 min with PBS and fixed for 20 min with 4% formaldehyde in PBS. After being rinsed once with PBS, cells were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 20 min on ice. After being washed three times with PBS for 1 min, cells were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were applied in 2% BSA in PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Cells were then washed three times for 1 min in PBS. Secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorescent probes (Alexa Fluor 488 rabbit anti-goat IgG (H+L), Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) were applied for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed 4× with PBS for 5 min per wash and images were taken with the IN Cell Analyzer 2000 system (General Electric, Marlborough, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Real-Time Kinetic Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion ability of cells was examined by using HTS FluroBlokTM Insert containing a 6.5-mm filter with a pore size of 8 µm (BD Falcon, San Jose, CA, USA). For Matrigel coating, 50 µl of 100 µg/mL Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) was applied to the membrane filters of the insert. Filters were dried overnight in a laminar flow hood. Colon-26MGS cells and Colon-26 cells were pre-labeled with DiIC12(3) (BD Biosciences) at a concentration of 1.25 µg/mL for 1 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Pre-labeled cells were suspended into the serum-free RPMI1640 medium and seeded into each of the upper inserts at 2 × 104 cells/well, while RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum was added in the lower chamber, and the real-time kinetic invasion assays were carried out for 36 h. The images of total cells and invaded cells were captured at different time points using the In Cell Analyzer 2000 system (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). The number of invaded cells in three random fields was counted using ImageJ software. Each experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Generation of Pseudotyped VSVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (Indiana) containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene instead of the VSV glycoprotein (G) gene (VSVΔG*-G) and pseudotyped VSVs bearing GPs of LASV (strain Josiah) or LUJV (strain IGR140) were generated as described previously (15 (link), 34 (link)). Briefly, HEK293T cells were transfected with the expression plasmid pCAGGS carrying the LUJV GP gene, and 24 h later, the cells were infected with VSVΔG*-G at a multiplicity of infection of 1.0. After a 16-h incubation, the supernatants were collected and centrifuged to remove cell debris. Infectious units (IU) of the pseudotyped VSVs in each cell line were determined as described previously (35 (link), 36 (link)). Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates 1 day before virus inoculation, and 24 h later, GFP-positive cells were counted using an In Cell analyzer 2000 system (GE Healthcare). To reduce the background infectivity of the residual parent VSVΔG*-G, each pseudotyped virus stock was treated with a neutralizing monoclonal antibody specific for the VSV G protein (VSV-G[N]1-9) before use (37 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microglial Nitric Oxide and ROS Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microglial production of NO in culture media was assessed using a Nitric Oxide Colorimetric Assay kit according to the manufacture's protocol. The level of ROS was analysed using the fluorescent probe CM-H 2 DCFDA. The ROS level was measured via determining the fluorescent intensity (excitation:493 nm and emission:522nm). Also, cells were visualised using an In Cell Analyzer 2000 system (GE Healthcare, Grandview Blvd, Waukesha, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed, fixed permeabilized, and blocked. After that, cells were incubated at 4 °C overnight with the primary antibodies. The next day, cells were incubated secondary antibodies and DAPI. Finally, the samples were imaged using the In Cell Analyzer 2000 system (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!