The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Positively charged membrane

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United Kingdom

The positively charged membrane is a type of laboratory equipment used in various analytical and separation techniques. It functions as a physical barrier that selectively allows the passage of charged particles or molecules based on their electrical properties. The core purpose of this membrane is to facilitate the separation, purification, or enrichment of specific analytes in complex samples, contributing to the accuracy and reliability of laboratory analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using positively charged membrane

1

Non-radioactive BCTV-Svr DNA Probe Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A non-radioactive (DIG-labeled) BCTV-Svr DNA probe was prepared using a PCR ELISA, DIG labeling, kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to manufacturer’s recommendation. The primer pair BCTV-Svr358V/877C was used for production of a digoxigenin-labelled BCTV-specific probe. Total DNA (approximately 4 µg) was electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel, and blotted onto a positively charged membrane (Roche, Switzerland). Total DNA from healthy PCSP plants and seeds were used as negative controls. The DNA was cross-linked to the membrane using a UV source (HeroLab, Ludwig-Wagner, Germany). Prehybridization was carried out in 10 mL of 0.25 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 7% SDS and 1 mM EDTA at 42 °C for 1 h. The membrane was hybridized at 42 °C overnight, after adding 25 ng/mL probe along with phosphate buffer. Membrane was then washed twice with washing buffer (150 mM NaCl, 100 mM maleic acid, and 0.33% Tween-20), once at room temperature, and once at 68 °C. DIG label was serologically detected using anti DIG-alkaline phosphatase conjugated and NBT/BCIP substrate, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, for 1 h at room temperature [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Restriction Enzyme Digestion of Aphid gDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each gDNA sample (two gDNA samples from each of the following: M. persicae and the orange and green variants of A. pisum) was digested separately with four restriction enzymes (BglII, EcoRI, DraI and HindIII). A 2-μl aliquot (100 ng) of each sample was blotted on a positively charged membrane (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and then cross-linked under UV for 3 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CrCOL1 Gene Exon Analysis by Southern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (1 μg) extracted according to Štorchová et al. (2000) was digested with restriction enzymes, electrophoresed overnight on a 0.9% agarose gel, and transferred to a positively charged membrane (Roche, Germany) by capillary blotting. A 0.5-kb fragment of the first exon of the CrCOL1 gene was amplified and labelled with digoxigenin (DIG) using a PCR labelling kit (Roche, Germany) according to the manufacturer. The primers used to generate the probes are provided in Supplementary Table S1 (available at JXB online). The membranes were hybridized with non-radioactively labelled probes and visualized as described (Cháb et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Verification of Protozoa-Exposed Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To eliminate false-positive sequences that escaped the subtraction process, southern hybridization was used for primary verification. Cloned inserts obtained from protozoa-exposed-specific cDNA libraries were amplified by PCR with SCOTS01 primers. PCR amplicons of positive SCOTS clones were transferred to a positively charged membrane (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Samples of gDNA and cDNA mixtures generated from protozoa-exposed strain NJ-35 and protozoa-unexposed strain NJ-35 were used as probes, followed by labeling with DIG-dUTP (Roche). Dot blot hybridization analysis using DIG Easy Hyb (Roche) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The clones that hybridized positively with the protozoa-exposed probes but negatively with the protozoa-unexposed probes were termed SCOTS clones. Then, the inserts of positive cDNA clones were sequenced by GENEWIZ, Inc., and the nucleotide sequences were queried using BLASTn implemented in BLAST+ (version 2.2.29; ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/) against the genome of A. hydrophila NJ-35. To classify the functions of the preferentially expressed genes, BLASTp implemented in BLAST+ (version 2.2.29) was used to align the amino acid sequences against the COGs database (updated 2014), and some genes related to bacterial virulence were classified according to a previous study (Pang et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Telomere Length Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Telomere length assays were performed using the teloTAGGG kit (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., West Sussex, UK). One microgram of genomic DNA was digested with HinfI/RsaI. Digests were separated by gel electrophoresis and blotted onto positively charged membrane (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., West Sussex, UK). Membranes were UV cross-linked, baked at 120 °C and washed in 2×SSC solution. Hybridization of DIG-labeled telomeric probe was performed using buffers and probe provided. Membranes were washed, probed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG and exposed to CDP-star. Experiments were performed twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Southern Blot Analysis of AtEFR Transgenic Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Southern blot analysis was performed as per the method described by Tripathi et al. [23 (link)]. Briefly, 10 μg of genomic DNA from each sample was restricted with BamH1 for 12 h. The DNA samples, including plasmid pBIN19g-35S::AtEFR and genomic DNA sample from a control non-transgenic plant, were run for a 0.8% agarose gel at 50 V. The gel stained with GelRed® was viewed under ultraviolet light to confirm the digestion. The restricted DNA was denatured, then blotted onto a positively charged membrane (Roche Diagnostics, West Sussex, UK) and fixed using ultraviolet cross-linking. The blots were then hybridized with a digoxigenin (DIG) PCR-labeled 635-bp AtEFR-specific probe. Hybridization and probe detection was performed using a DIG Luminescent Detection Kit for Nucleic Acids (Roche Diagnostics, UK) as per the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

tRNA and mRNA Northern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were obtained by using TOTALLY RNA™ kit (Ambion) from intact cells or mitochondria isolated from mutant and control cell lines (∼2 × 108 cells), as detailed elsewhere (39 (link)). For tRNA Northern blot analysis, 6 μg of total cellular RNA was electrophoresed through a 10% polyacrylamide/8 M urea gel in 1× TBE buffer after heating the samples at 65°C for 10 min, and then electroblotted onto a positively charged Nylon membrane (Roche) for the hybridization analysis with digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide probes, respectively. A set of DIG-labeled probes of 22 mitochondrial tRNAs and 5S rRNA was described elsewhere (26 (link),40 (link),41 (link)). The hybridization and quantification of density in each band were performed as detailed previously (40–43 (link)).
For mRNA Northern blot analysis, 6 μg of total cellular RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis through a 2% agarose–formaldehyde gel, transferred onto a positively charged membrane (Roche) and hybridized with a set of DIG-labeled RNA probes: COX2, CYTB, ND1, ND3, ND6, COX1, 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA and β-actin as a control, respectively. Probes were synthesized as described previously (13 (link),26 (link),44 (link)). The hybridization and quantification of density in each band were performed as detailed previously (26 (link),44 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analyzing Gene Expression in Yeast Using Northern Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was obtained from yeast cultures (2.0×107 cells) using a TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Equal amounts (10 µg) of total RNA were separated by electrophoresis through 1.5% formaldehyde denaturing agarose gel, transferred onto a positively charged membrane (Roche Applied Science) and hybridized with a DIG-labeled HXK2-specific antisense RNA probe. The blot was then stripped with stripping buffer (50% formamide, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH7.5, 5% SDS) and hybridized using PFK1 and PYK1 probes, respectively. Finally, the blot was hybridized with a nuclear encoded ACT1 probe as an internal control [38] (link). The probes were synthesized from the corresponding plasmid linearized by restriction enzymes using a DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche Applied Science). The plasmids used for preparing the probes were constructed by PCR-amplifying fragments of HXK2 (positions 24094-24972), PFK1 (positions 971431-970785), PYK1 (positions 71983-73069), and ACT1 (positions 54696-54187), and then cloning the fragments into the pCRII-TOPO vector carrying the SP6 and T7 promoters (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Northern Blot Analysis of Total RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) as described [52 (link)]. 5’ RACE was performed using the 5’/3’ RACE Kit (Roche). For Northern blotting 10–20 μg total RNA were separated using 7 M urea/10% acrylamide/0.6 x TBE gels. The RNA was transferred onto positively charged membranes (Roche) by semi dry blotting in 1 x TBE and UV crosslinked. For radioactive labeling 20 μCi γ-ATP32 (Hartmann Analytic) were mixed with 10 U T4 Polynucleotide kinase (Fermentas) and 4 pmol oligonucleotide and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by addition of STE buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA) and the labeled oligonucleotides were purified using MicroSpin G-25 columns (GE Healthcare). The probes were mixed with 500 μg yeast tRNA (Invitrogen) and 250 μg salmon sperm DNA (Invitrogen) to reduce unspecific probe binding. Denaturation was carried out for 10 min at 95°C. Hybridization was performed in hybridization buffer (0.5 M Na2HPO4, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA pH 7.5, 7% [w/v] SDS) over night at 68°C. The blots were washed in washing buffer (40 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, 1% [w/v] SDS) and exposed to a Phosphorimaging screen and analyzed with a Typhoon FLA-9000 (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures were grown to stationary phase (OD600 of 3). 2.5 ml culture were withdrawn, mixed with 0.2 volume of stop solution (5% water-saturated phenol, 95% ethanol) and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. After thawing on ice, bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation (2 min, 14.000 rpm, 4°C), and RNA was isolated using the SV total RNA purification kit (Promega) as described by the manufacturer. RNA concentration and quality were determined by measurement of A260 and A280. Total cellular RNA (10 μg) was mixed with loading buffer (0.03% bromophenol blue, 4 mM EDTA, 0.1 mg/ml EtBr, 2.7% formaldehyde, 31% formamide, 20% glycerol in 4 × MOPS buffer) and was separated on agarose gels (1.2%), transferred overnight onto positively charged membranes (Roche) in 20 × SSC and UV cross-linked. Prehybridization, hybridization to DIG-labeled DNA probes and membrane washing were conducted using the DIG luminescent Detection kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The csrC and csrB transcripts were detected with a DIG-labeled PCR fragment (DIG-PCR nucleotide mix, Roche) with primer pair 23/24 and 25/26 (Supplementary Table 2), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!