The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jpk nanowizard 4

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Germany, United States

The JPK NanoWizard 4 is an advanced atomic force microscope (AFM) designed for high-resolution, high-sensitivity imaging and force measurements at the nanoscale. It features a compact and modular design, allowing for integration with a variety of microscopy techniques. The NanoWizard 4 provides precise control and measurement capabilities for a wide range of applications in materials science, biology, and nanotechnology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using jpk nanowizard 4

1

Atomic Force Microscopy of Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRC-5 cells (1.0 × 105) were cultured at WillCo-dish® glass bottom dishes (Willco Wells BV, GWST-5040) and subjected to an atomic force microscope (JPK NanoWizard 4, Bruker Nano GmbH) for imaging in QI mode. The topographical images were acquired in PBS by using a PFQNM-LC-CAL probe (Bruker Nano GmbH) with an end radius of 75 nm and a force constant around 0.09 N/m. After an entire cell was imaged by AFM in PBS, the colloid probe (MLCT-O-A probe, Bruker Nano GmbH) with a 20-μm diameter silica sphere was localized on an intact single cell, and then the mechanical stiffness (i.e., Young’s modulus) was measured by Hertz model via AFM indentation test. The Young’s modulus distributions of the lung tissue of mouse were characterized on an atomic force microscope (JPK NanoWizard 4, Bruker Nano Inc.). Frozen sections of mouse lung tissue were placed on slides. The topographies were measured by QI mode, which collected force curve matrix for further calculation of Young’s modulus distribution. A ScanAsyst-Fluid probe with a force constant around 0.7 N/m and a tip radius around 20 nm was applied in the characterization. Force curves in matrix were fitted with Hertz model to calculate the corresponding Young’s modulus by using commercial software provided from Nano Wizard 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

AFM-SMFS Characterization of CNBD Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AFM-SMFS measurements were performed using a JPK Nanowizard 4. All SMFS experiments were performed in measuring buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl). Silicon tips with a nominal spring constant of 100 pN/nm (MNSL, Bruker) were used for all AFM-SMFS experiments. The spring constant of the cantilevers was first carefully calibrated using JPK Nanowizard 4 based on the thermal tuning method 28 . Before SMFS experiments, the His6-C-linker-CNBD 2D-crystals on the SLBs were localized by imaging. Then, the tip was positioned over the 2D-crystal for SMFS. To generate the dynamic force spectrum, retraction velocities were varied from 0.2 μm/s to 4.0 μm/s after pre-defined cN-CNBD contact times. To obtain 2D-binding kinetics, force curves were acquired at constant approach and retraction speeds of 0.2 μm/s varying the contact duration from 0.02 s to 1.00 s. In addition, the kinetic parameters of cAMP entering a deeper binding mode (state 2 bond) were quantitively estimated from these measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

AFM Imaging and Mechanical Characterization of MRC-5 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRC-5 cells were cultured at WillCo-dish glass bottom dishes (Willco Wells BV, GWST-5040). Cell images were captured in QI mode under an AFM (JPK NanoWizard 4, Bruker Nano GmbH, Germany). A PFQNM-LC-CAL probe (Bruker Nano GmbH) with an end radius of 75 nm and a force constant of 0.09 N/m was used to acquire topographical images. After an entire cell was imaged by AFM in PBS, the colloid probe (MLCT-O-A probe, Bruker Nano GmbH) with a 20-μm diameter silica sphere was localized on an intact single cell. Young’s modulus was measured using the AFM indentation test based on a Hertz model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Roughness Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surfaces were imaged in tapping
mode (JPK NanoWizard 4, Bruker Nano GmbH, USA) with a cantilever (type
OPUS, 160-AC-NA, back side coating with reflective aluminum) with
300 kHz resonance frequency, a spring constant of 26 Nm–1 and a nominal tip radius <7 nm (Figure S3). The calculation of the root mean square roughness (RMS) roughness
was done with the software Gwyddion on part of the images of 15 ×
15 μm2. The images were leveled using a polynomial
background of first degree (offset and plane). Each process was repeated
with three independent samples. Each sample was measured in at least
two different positions. The standard error was calculated using the
formula SE = σ × n–1/2, where σ
represents the standard deviation and n represents the sample size.
The measured root-mean-square roughness of the surfaces is summarized
in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

AFM Imaging of Nanoscale Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM imaging was performed at room temperature on a JPK NanoWizard 4 (Bruker, MA, USA) operated in tapping mode and using MSNL cantilevers (Bruker, MA, USA). Open source Gwyddion software (version 2.60, http://gwyddion.net/) was used for image processing [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microgel Morphology Characterization by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry microgel films were imaged via AFM to determine the microgel morphology. The films were prepared by drying a 0.01 mg mL−1 microgel dispersion on glass coverslips followed by immersing in water and drying under a stream of nitrogen. For AFM imaging, the JPK NanoWizard 2 (JPK Instruments AG, Berlin, Germany) with cantilevers with a nominal spring constant of 40 N m−1 (HQ:XSC11/NO AL, MikroMash, Bulgaria) was used in tapping mode. For elastic modulus determination, a JPK NanoWizard 4 (Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany) in the QI (quantitative imaging) mode, with cantilevers with a nominal spring constant of 2.7 N m−1 (HQ:XSC11/NO AL, MikroMash, Sofia, Bulgaria) with a nominal tip radius of 8 nm, was used. The measurements were conducted in lectin binding buffer (LBB, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, pH 7.4) using the microgel coatings as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoscale Surface Topography Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the in vitro surface area analysis, Roxolid discs were prepared with a modified-SLA-like surface (mod-dry/micro) and a SLActive surface, accelerated aged and then air dried under a laminar flow hood (dry/nano). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is the most suitable technique for measuring nanoscale surface topography of hard surfaces, but the sandblasting process leads to undesirable artefacts in the measurement process; the sandblasting step was therefore omitted without impacting the low-micro and nanotopography, which are a result of the etching and aging process.
AFM measurements were performed using a JPK Nanowizard 4 (Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany) with a direct drive cantilever holder and SSS-NCHR cantilevers with a tip radius of 2–3 nm (Nanotools GmbH, Munich, Germany) in dynamic mode. An area of 2 × 2 µm2 was scanned for every measurement at 0.25 Hz/line and recorded using 2048 × 2048 points. The data were analyzed using µSoft Analysis XT software (version 5.1.1.5944; NanoFocus AG, Oberhausen, Germany) according to ISO 25,178 using a Gaussian filter with a cut-off wavelength of 0.25 µm and the area ratio between mod-dry/micro and dry/nano was estimated as (SdrmodMA/100 + 1)/(SdrMA/100 + 1), where Sdr is the mean developed interfacial area ratio. For each sample group, 5 discs were measured at two random positions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Incubated samples (5 μl) were transferred to freshly cleaved mica plates and left to absorb for 1 min, rinsed three times with 300 μl of pure water, and then dried under a gentle flow of nitrogen. AFM imaging was performed on a JPK Nanowizard 4 (Bruker, Germany) AFM unit using Tap150Al-G cantilevers (Ted Pella Inc., USA) in air intermittent contact mode. The scan rate was 0.3 -0.7 Hz, the scan area size was 5 μm x 5 μm or 10 μm x 10 μm, with 512 x 512 or 1024 x 1024 pixel resolution respectively. The AFM images were analyzed using the Gwyddion 2.54 software (Necas and Klapetek, 2012) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing Protein Adsorption on Lipid Bilayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the protein coverage and protein height, atomic force micrographs of the SLB surface before and after protein addition were taken. ENTHWT and ENTHR114A (1 µM) were added for 2 h at RT. The solution was mixed with a stirring bar to ensure homogenous distribution of the protein. Afterwards 10 × 10 µm2 and 1 × 1 µm2 areas of the substrates were imaged in contact mode with BL-AC40TS-C2 cantilevers (f = 85.4–139.1 kHz, k = 0.03–0.12 N m−1, Olympus, Tokio, Japan). Measurements were performed using a JPK Nanowizard 4 (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) equipped with a CCD camera (Fire Wire CCD color camera, The Imaging Source, NC, USA). The protein height and cluster surface coverage were calculated with a MATLAB routine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hydrogel Mechanical Characterization by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
30µl hydrogels were formed in Sigmacote®-treated 6mm diameter glass cylindrical moulds in 35mm petri dishes and stored in PBS at 4°C prior to testing. Force-distance measurements were carried out on a JPK Nanowizard 4 (JPK instruments AG, DE) directly on hydrogels immersed in PBS at RT. To perform indentation measurements, spherical glass beads (diameter 10μm; Whitehouse Scientific, UK) were mounted onto tipless triangular silicon nitride cantilevers (spring constant (K) ≈ 0.12N m−1; Bruker AXS SAS, FR) using UV-cross-linked Loctite super glue. The deflection sensitivity of the AFM photodiode was then calibrated by collecting a single force-distance curve on a glass slide. Cantilevers were calibrated using the thermal method47 in air. Measurements were made on 6 different locations across each hydrogel’s surface (100µm x 100µm areas, 100 force curves per location on 3 independent hydrogels per condition). Indentations were carried out with a relative setpoint force of 3nN and a loading rate of 4μm s−1. Data were collected using JPK proprietary SPM software (version 6.1, JPK Instruments AG, DE). The Oliver–Pharr model for a spherical tip was used to determine E. Outliers were removed using a ROUT test (Q=1%). As for other hydrated biological samples, we assumed that volume was conserved and assigned a Poisson’s ratio of 0.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!