The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using a6397

1

Multimodal Neuronal Tracing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The last sections through the Vc of the rats in the first group and the sections through the Vc from the second group injected with FG, TMR, and formalin were also processed for triple-immunofluorescence histochemistry for Fos, TMR and FG. Briefly, the sections were incubated with (1) a mixture of 1 μg/ml mouse anti-Fos antibody (ab 208,942, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), 1 μg/ml guinea pig anti-FG antibody (NM-101, Protos Biotech Corporation) and 0.5 μg/ml rabbit anti-TMR antibody (A-6397, Invitrogen) in PBS that contained 0.3% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.25% (w/v) λ-carrageenan, and 3% (v/v) donkey serum (PBS-XCD) overnight at room temperature; (2) 10 μg/ml biotinylated donkey anti-mouse IgG (AP192B, Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA); and (3) a mixture of 10 μg/ml Alexa 647-conjugated goat anti-guinea pig IgG antibody (A-21450, Invitrogen), 10 μg/ml Alexa594-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody (A-21207, Invitrogen), and 10 μg/ml Fluorescein Avidin D (A-2001; Vector) in PBS that contained 3% (v/v) normal donkey serum.
Another series of sections from the second group was used to conduct the control experiments for immunofluorescence histochemistry, in which the Fos antibody was omitted. Under these conditions, no immunoreactivity for the omitted antibody was observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Imaging Flow Chamber Construction and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging flow chambers were constructed as in Section VII of Gell et al., 2010 (link), with the following modifications: two narrow strips of parafilm replaced double-sided scotch tape as chamber dividers: following placement of the smaller coverslip onto the parafilm strips, the chamber was heated to melt the parafilm and create a seal between the coverslips; typically, only three strips of parafilm were used, resulting in two chambers per holder. Chambers were prepared with an anti-rhodamine antibody (Invitrogen A6397, RRID:AB_2536196) followed by blocking with Pluronic F127, as described in Section VIII of Gell et al., 2010 (link). Microtubules were adhered to the chamber coverslip, and the chamber was flushed gently with warm BRB80. The flow chamber was heated to 28 °C using an objective heater on the microscope stage, and then 3–4 channel volumes of imaging buffer were flushed through the chamber. Microtubules were imaged on a Nikon TiE microscope using 488 nm and 561 nm lasers sent through a Ti-TIRF-PAU for Total Internal Reflectance Fluorescence (TIRF) illumination. An Andor iXon3 EM-CCD camera fitted with or without a 2.5x projection lens depending on the experiment was used to capture images with high signal-to-noise and small pixel size (64 nm or 160 nm, respectively). Images were collected using TIRF with a Nikon CFI Apochromat 100x 1.49 NA oil objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolic Labeling and Click Chemistry for Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with culture media containing the YnMyr (20 µM, WuXi AppTec, Shanghai, China) for 24 h before harvest. Then, a click mixture [mixed with the capture reagent AzTB (0.1 mM, WuXi AppTec), CuSO4 (1 mM), tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) (1 mM), and tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine (TBTA) (0.1 mM) in DMSO] was added to each sample before vortexing at RT for 1 h. After adding 1 ml ice-cold MeOH containing EDTA (10 mM), the samples were quickly vortexed and kept at −80°C overnight. Next day, the samples were centrifuged to pellet precipitated proteins, and the pellets were dissolved by 75 µl 2% SDS in PBS and 25 µl 4 × SLB [sample-loading buffer prepared by mixing 4 × NuPAGE™ LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Wal-tham, MA, USA) and ß-mercaptoethanol of a ratio of 5:1]. Finally, the samples were subjected to WB using primary antibody against TAMRA (Abcam, #ab171120 or Invitrogen, #A6397).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Double Immunofluorescence Staining for FG and TMR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The second series of sections through the LPB was processed for FG and TMR double‐labeled staining. The sections were incubated at room temperature sequentially with (1) guinea pig anti‐FG (1:200, NM‐101, Protos Biotech, New York, NY) and rabbit anti‐TMR (1:200, A6397, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) overnight, and (2) Alexa488‐conjugated donkey antibody to guinea pig IgG (1:500, 706‐545‐148, Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) and Alexa594‐conjugated donkey antibody to rabbit (1:500, A21207, Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) for 6 hr. The (1)incubation was carried out at room temperature in PBS containing 0.3% (v/v) Triton X‐100, 0.25% (w/v) λ‐carrageenan, 0.05% NaN3, and 1% (v/v) donkey serum (PBS‐XCD). The (2) incubation was carried out at room temperature in PBS containing 0.3% (v/v) Triton X‐100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaging Flow Chamber Construction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging flow chambers were constructed by placing two narrow strips of parafilm onto salinized coverslips, and following placement of the smaller coverslip onto the parafilm strips, the chamber was heated to melt the parafilm and create a seal between the coverslips similar to Section VII of Gell et al. 2010 [53 (link)]. Typically, only three strips of parafilm were used, resulting in two chambers per holder. Chambers were then flushed with anti-rhodamine antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-6397) and allowed to incubate for 15 minutes, followed by flushing with Pluronic F127, which was allowed to incubate for a minimum of 30 minutes [53 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TIRF Microscopy Flow Chamber Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow chambers were assembled for TIRF microscopy as described (Gell et al., 2010 (link)) with the following adaptation: To create a ‘lane’ for the unidirectional flow of samples, two narrow strips of Parafilm were arranged parallel to each other in between two hydrophobic silanized coverslips. Chambers were subjected to heat in order to melt the Parafilm strips and create a seal between the coverslips. Before use, the chamber was treated with rabbit anti-rhodamine antibody diluted 1:50 (A6397, Thermo Fisher), or a mixture of streptavidin (20μg/mL) and neutravidin (25μg/mL), in Brb80 for 30 min. followed by blocking with pluronic F127 for at least 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Chamber Assembly for TIRF Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow chambers were assembled for TIRF microscopy as described (Gell et al., 2010) with the following adaptation: To create a 'lane' for the unidirectional flow of samples, two narrow strips of Parafilm were arranged parallel to each other in between two hydrophobic silanized coverslips. Chambers were subjected to heat in order to melt the Parafilm strips and create a seal between the coverslips. Before use, the chamber was treated with rabbit anti-rhodamine antibody diluted 1:50 (A6397, Thermo Fisher) in Brb80 for 30 min followed by blocking with pluronic F127 for at least 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microtubule Assembly Dynamics under Oxidative Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mixture of 36.5 μM unlabeled tubulin, 1mM GTP, and 50μM DCP-Rho1 in Brb80 was prepared on ice and incubated for 2.5h at 37°C in the presence or absence of H2O2 (0–1.5mM). The mixture was diluted 30-fold with warm 10μM Taxol in Brb80. 240μL of the microtubule sample were spun via air-driven centrifuge (20psi, 5min), and the pellet was re-suspended in 100μL of warm 10μM Taxol in Brb80 and stored at −80°C. Reducing electrophoresis buffer was added and heated to denature proteins, and immunoblotting was performed. Samples were resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked in 1% BSA in Tris-buffered saline with 0.15% Tween. For the detection of DCP-Rho1, lysates were probed with primary antibody against rhodamine (A6397, Fisher Scientific) followed by HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (sc-2004, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For detection of tubulin, membranes were probed with primary antibody against alpha-tubulin (clone DM1A, #PI34095, VWR) followed by HRP-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (SC-205, Santa Cruz BioTechnology). Western blots were developed using chemiluminescence (PI34095, Fisher) and densitometry analysis was performed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detecting Oxidative Stress in H9c2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H9c2 cells were grown in DMEM+ media for 3d, then passaged into 6-well dishes. Cells were incubated in 0–1mM H2O2 for 1h. During the final 10 min of the incubation in H2O2, 10 μM DCP-Rho1 in DMSO was added. Cells were released and lysed in hot, reducing electrophoresis buffer for 6min. Samples were resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were then blocked in 1% BSA in Tris-buffered saline with 0.15% Tween. For detection of DCP-Rho1, lysates were probed with primary antibody against rhodamine (A6397, Fisher Scientific) followed by HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (sc-2004, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For detection of tubulin, membranes were probed with primary antibody against alpha-tubulin (clone DM1A, #PI34095, VWR) followed by HRP-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (SC-205, Santa Cruz BioTechnology). Western blots were developed using chemiluminescence (PI34095, Fisher) and densitometry analysis was performed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!