The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using synergy mx spectrophotometer

1

THP-1 Proliferation Assay for DEHP Cytotoxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assure that the THP-1 cells had not been affected by the cytotoxic effects of DEHP exposure by SGBS-CM from d4, a BrdU assay (Cell Proliferation ELISA BrdU, Roche, Germany) was performed. As PMA-induced THP-1 macrophages do not proliferate, THP-1 monocytes were used for this assay. The cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 7.4  ×  103 cells/well. They were exposed to DEHP at a concentration of 10 to 50 µg/ml for four days. At d3, BrdU labeling solution (10 µl/well) was added to the cells and incubated for an additional 24 h. The reaction was stopped according to the manual, and absorption at 450 nm was measured in a multiwell plate reader (Synergy Mx-Spectrophotometer, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Cytosolic LDH Release

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The enzymatic activity of cytosolic LDH released extracellularly in the cell culture supernatants was measured using the CytoTox 96 nonradioactive colorimetric assay per the manufacturer instructions. After exposure to Nx nanoformulations, supernatants were collected and frozen at −80°C until their analysis for LDH activity; 50 µL of supernatant of each sample was plated in 96-well plates and 50 µL of substrate from the LDH assay kit was added to each well. The plate was then incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Absorbance was read at 490 nm using a BioTek Synergy Mx spectrophotometer. Culture medium control wells were used to correct for phenol red and endogenous LDH activity in the serum and untreated cells served to measure LDH spontaneously released from cells. Cells treated with 10% DMSO served as positive controls. Data are reported as percentage release of LDH compared to untreated control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative BCC Suspension Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BCC strains held in autoclaved nuclease-free water (Qiagen) were adjusted to a density corresponding to 0.08–0.1 absorbance at a wavelength of 600 nm (approximate cell density: 1.5 × 108 colony-forming units (CFU/mL)) in the Synergy MX spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) [11 (link)]. Each sample was prepared (23 January 2020) and stored at 23 °C (i.e., room temperature) for 361 consecutive days. Serial dilutions of each BCC suspension were prepared in 1 mL autoclaved nuclease-free water to yield appropriate CFUs (10, 102, 103, and 104 CFU/mL). A total of 100 μL of each dilution (10, 102, 103, and 104 CFU/mL) were boiled for 10 min in a water bath and were used as templates for qPCR and LAMP assays. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA), with a p value of <0.05 being considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Cellular Calcium Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multi-well calcium flux assays were performed with the Fura-2 QBT Calcium Kit (R8197, Molecular Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). 10,000 – 20,000 cells/well were plated into a 96-well plate to achieve confluence when analyzed. Prior to the assay, cells were loaded for 1 hour with Fura-2 QBT loading dye according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Baseline signals were obtained on a Synergy Mx spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT) at 340 ex/510 em (calcium bound) and 380 ex/510 em (calcium unbound) for one minute prior to exogenous stimulation with control (PBS), VEGFA (R&D Systems) or histamine (H7125, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Kinetic reads were completed every 23 seconds for up to 10 minutes post-stimulation. Data was normalized to baseline values for each well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antiproliferative Effects of Compounds on Breast and Cervical Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (ATCC HTB-26) were maintained in culture in phenol-red free L-15 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 12.5 μg/mL amphotericin (PSA) at 37 °C in a humidified incubator. HeLa cervical cancer cells (ATCC CCL-2) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented as above at 37 °C and 9% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
The antiproliferative effects of the compounds were assessed using the WST-1 assay (Sigma-Aldrich, Johannesburg, South Africa) as previously described [35 (link),36 (link)]. Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 6000 cells per well into 96-well plates and incubated overnight, followed by treatment with a range of concentrations (0.32, 1.6, 8, 40, 200 and 1000 μM) of the compounds or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle control (0.02% v/v DMSO) for 96 h. Thereafter 2.5 µL of WST-1 Cell Proliferation Reagent was added per well and the absorbance at 450 nm after 8 h recorded using a Synergy Mx spectrophotometer (BioTek). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for each compound was calculated relative to the vehicle-treated control from a dose response curve (log concentration vs absorbance at 595 nm) using non-linear regression with GraphPad Prism 4 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Determining LOD and LOQ for B. cenocepacia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LOQ is the lowest analyte DNA concentration that provides an acceptable level of precision (i.e., 3/3 replicates amplified), whereas LOD is defined as the concentration of a measurand that is significantly different from a negative control (i.e., at least 2/3 replicates amplified) [28 (link)]. LOD and LOQ were measured through the qPCR and LAMP assays using tenfold serial dilutions of B. cenocepacia AU1054 and B. cenocepacia J2315 genomic DNA. LAMP products were directly analyzed with both the naked eye, and 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, the absorbance in LAMP products was measured using a Synergy MX spectrophotometer from BioTek Instruments, Inc. (Winooski, VT, USA) at 434 and 560 nm [19 (link)]. A reaction was considered positive when the color value was above 0.05 (ΔOD = OD434nm − OD560nm; difference in absorbance of samples at 434 (increased absorbance) and 560 nm (decreased absorbance)). Negative reactions (i.e., wells with ΔOD values below 0.05) were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm if a result is a true negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generating Antigen-Loaded Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DCs were isolated according to the protocol described above. Between days 8 and 10 of cultivation, cells were collected for co-culturing. GL261 tumor cells were stimulated as described above and incubated for 24 h. The cells were then subjected to six cycles of freezing (–80 °C) and thawing (+55 °C). Total protein in the cell lysate was measured with a commercial BCA Protein Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and a Synergy MX spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments Inc., USA). Two mg of protein was added to a suspension of 10 × 106 DCs for 90 min. To activate the DCs, they were treated with lipopolysaccharide (0.5 μg/ml) for 24 h. In some experiments, PBS or DCs co-cultured with GL261 glioma cell lysates subjected to several freeze/thaw cycles to induce accidental necrosis (without photoinduction) were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Isolation and Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of T. brucei, a gift from Professor Ullman (Oregon Health Sciences University, USA), was employed as a template for PCR amplification. All spectrophotometric analyses were performed in 96-well micro-titre plates (BioTek Synergy MX spectrophotometer using Gen5™ 2.0 Data Analysis Software); liquid chromatography was performed on an Äkta FPLC Purification System (GE Healthcare Life Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out using a T100 thermal cycler (Biorad, South Africa); a Bioflux Biospin kit was obtained from Separations Scientific (South Africa). CloneJet® PCG cloning kit was obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific (South Africa) and pGEM-T® Easy vector system from Promega Corporation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Colorimetric Serum Urea Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum urea levels were evaluated through colorimetric assays based on the urease method using deproteinized serum samples (Labtest, Brazil). Values were determined using a Synergy Mx spectrophotometer (Biotek, Winooski, Vermont, USA) and analyzed accordingly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Physicochemical Analysis of Silk Fibroin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical structure of SF and LPA/SF was analyzed using ATR-FTIR (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at the spectra wavelength range of 4000–400 cm−1.
The morphology was investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S4700) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) on a Scanning Probe Microscope XE 70 (Multimode-8, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Contact angle characterization was carried out by employing water contact goniometer (TantecTM, CAM-PLUS Micro, Schaumburg, IL, USA) to measure the hydrophilicity of tissue culture polystyrene (TCP), SF, and LPA/SF. Transparency of SF and LPA/SF was evaluated by SYNERGY Mx spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at a wavelength range of 380 nm–780 nm after immersing in PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!