The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using lcms 8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

1

Quantitative UHPLC-MS-MS Analysis of 19 Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative UHPLC-MS-MS analyses were carried out on a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) Nexera UHPLC system and LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The analytes were separated on a Shimadzu XR-ODS III (1.6 μm) C18 column using a mobile phase consisting of 0.01% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The solvent gradient involved isocratic elution with 12% B for 0.5 min, followed by a linear increase to 36% B over 6 min. The flow rate was 0.25 mL/min, the column temperature 40 °C. Analytes were quantified using both positive and negative ion electrospray mode by employing the polarity switch option. SRM transitions for 19 were 611>303 and 609>301.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Target Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UHPLC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using a UHPLC system (Nexera X2, Shimadzu, Japan) coupled with a Shimadzu LC-MS 8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan). UHPLC separation was performed on a Waters ACQUITY BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm; 1.7 mm; MA, USA). The column temperature was set at 40°C with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min, and the injection volume was 5 μL. The mobile phases consist of methanol and water. The initial gradient conditions were 30% methanol, followed by a linear increase to 100% methanol in 6 min, and then changed to isocratic conditions with 100% methanol for 2 min. Subsequently, the mobile phase was decreased to 30% methanol in 1 min, held for 3 min before the next injection. The MS/MS detection was operated in the negative ionization mode with multiple reaction monitoring. N2 was used as the nebulizing gas at flow rate of 3 L/min; heating gas and drying gas flow rate were 10 L/min and 10 L/min, respectively. Interface temperature, desolvation line temperature, and heat block temperature were 300°C, 250°C, and 400°C, respectively. The optimized MS/MS parameters for the target compounds are given in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying UDP-Sugar Ratios in Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal and UDP-GlcNAc/UDP-GalNAc ratio in frozen liver tissues were determined at the UTSW Metabolic Phenotyping Core using a Nexera X2 UHPLC system coupled to a Shimadzu LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operating the dual ion source in electrospray (negative mode).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolite Profiling of Serum in RIPK1-tKO Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of metabolites in serum from 10-month-old control or RIPK1-tKO mice was performed using a Nexera X2 system (Shimadzu Corp.) equipped with two LC-30 AD pumps, a DGU-20A5R degasser, an SIL-30 AC autosampler, a CTO-20 AC column oven, and a CBM-20A control module, coupled with an LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corp.). A pentafluorophenylpropyl column (Discovery HS F5; 150 mm by 2.1 mm, 3 μm; Sigma-Aldrich) was used for the separation of metabolites. The mobile phase was composed of A, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water, and B, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. The flow rate, column temperature, and injection volume were set as 0.25 ml/min, 40°C, and 3 μl, respectively. The gradient program for mobile phase B was as follows: 0 min, 0%; 2 min, 0%; 5 min, 25%; 11 min, 35%; 15 min, 95%; 20 min, 95%; 20.1 min, 0%; and 25 min, 0%. The mass spectrometer was equipped with an electrospray ionization source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Metabolites by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatography was performed on a Nexera XR 40 series HPLC (Shimadzu) using a Synergi 4 µM Fusion-RP 80 Å 150 × 2 mm column (Phenomenex). The column temperature was kept at 40 °C, and the sample tray was maintained at 4 °C. 10 μL samples were injected at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min with 10 mM ammonium formate (pH 4.2) and methanol as mobile phases A and B, respectively. Metabolites were eluted using the following gradient: 0–8 min, 8–90% B; 8–10 min, 90% B; 10–10.1 min, 90–8% B; 10.1–20 min, 8% B. The LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with electro spray ionization (Shimadzu) was operated in the positive mode. Scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was employed to monitor analyte parent ions to product ion formation. MRM conditions were optimized using authentic standard chemicals including NAM ([M + H]+ 123.00 > 80.00, 123.00 > 78.00, 123.00 > 53.00), NAD+ ([M + H]+ 664.00 > 136.00, 664.00 > 427.90, 664.00 > 523.95), cADPR ([M + H]+ 541.80 > 136.15, 541.80 > 427.90, 541.80 > 347.90), and ADPR ([M + H]+ 559.80 > 136.05, 559.80 > 427.95, 559.80 > 347.95). Data acquisition was performed using the LabSolutions LCMS v5.97 software, and data processing was carried out using LabSolutions Postrun (both Shimadzu). Metabolite products were quantified by scheduled MRM peak integration using calibration curves of standard chemicals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Bile Acids by LCMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using the LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with the ESI source operated in positive MRM ion mode following a previously validated method [8 (link)]. The chromatographic separation was performed using the UPLC Nexera X2 System (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with the LC-30AD binary pump, DGU-20A5R degasser, CBM-20A controller, SIL-30AC autosampler, and CTO-20AC thermostated column oven. The separation of the derivatizated BAs was achieved using the Kinetex C8 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) column. The chromatographic separation conditions, MS/MS operation parameters (Table 2), and parameters of the monitored ion transitions (Supplementary Materials Table S1) are available in Supplementary Materials. Data acquisition and initial analysis were accomplished with LabSolutions 5.60 SP1 software. Further data processing and multivariate data analysis was performed using Orange v. 3.28 and Scikit-Learn v. 0.24 Python packages [21 ,22 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vivo Mitochondrial H2O2 Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurement of in vivo mitochondrial H2O2 production was performed according to the previously published protocol with modifications to the LC-MS/MS method(Cocheme et al., 2012 (link)). In brief, mice were injected retro-orbitally with 0.8 μmol/kg MitoB (Cayman Chemical, cat# 17116). Mice were euthanized 3 hours after injection and 100 mg of tissues were clamp-frozen. Tissues were processed as previously described previously (Cocheme et al., 2012 (link)). MitoB and MitoP compounds were analyzed by injecting 1 μL of sample into the LC/MS/MS system consisting of a Shimadzu LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operating the DUIS ion source in electrospray positive mode coupled to a Nexera X2 UHPLC (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD). Compounds were resolved on a Fluorophenyl column (2.7 micron, 2.1×100 mm, Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, PA) maintained at 30°C. The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.1% formic acid (eluent A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% FA (eluent B). Gradient elution was performed starting at 20% eluent B, a linear increase to 75% eluent B until 2.0 minutes, a step to 100% eluent B until 2.1 minutes, 100% eluent B until 5.6 minutes and re-equilibration from 5.7 until 7 minutes. The flow rate was set to 0.5 mL/minute.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tracing Nitrogen Assimilation in Cyanobacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assimilation ratio of newly added nitrogen sources at each time point was determined using stable isotope 15N-labelled Na15NO3 or 15NH4Cl. Synechocystis was transferred to the modified BG11 medium containing 5 mM Na15NO3 or 15NH4Cl 24 h after inoculation and cultivated under 1% (v/v) CO2 and 100 μ mol photons m−2 s−1 at 30 °C. The culture medium corresponding to 5 mg of dry cell weight was recovered at 0, 4, and 24 h, and the intracellular metabolites were analyzed by CE-MS as described above or by LC-MS/MS MRM. The procedure of sample preparation was the same as described above Section 4.2 (measurement of the intracellular metabolite concentration) and LC-MS/MS MRM analysis was performed by employing Nexera X2 high-performance liquid chromatography system and a LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), as described previously [28 (link)]. The 15N labeling rate was calculated as performed in 13C labeling experiments in previous reports [18 (link)]. The relative isotopomer abundance (mi) for each metabolite in which the i15N atoms were incorporated is calculated as follows: mi(%)=Mij=0nMj×100
N15 fraction(%)=i=1ni×min 
where Mi represents the isotopomer abundance of metabolite incorporating i15N atoms, and n is the number of nitrogen atoms in the metabolite. Statistical analysis was conducted using Welch’s t-test (* <0.05, ** <0.01).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Serum Metabolite Profiling by UHPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC and MS measurement conditions were as follows: Serum samples were subjected to a Nexera UHPLC system and LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). An Acquity UPLC BEH C8 column (1.7 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Waters) was used with the following mobile phase compositions: 5 mM NH4HCO3/water (mobile phase A), acetonitrile (mobile phase B), and isopropanol (mobile phase C). The pump gradient was programmed as follows [time (%A/%B/%C)]: 0 min (95/5/0), to 8 min (70/30/0), 16 min (30/35/35), 28 min (6/47/47), 35 min (6/47/47), 35.1 min (95/5/0); it was then held for 38 min for equilibration. The flow rate was 0.35 mL/min, and the column temperature was 47 °C. The injection volume was 5 µL. SRM analysis was performed using positive/negative ion-switching mode ESI, with a collision energy of 46 eV. All data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Cholic and Muricholic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this work, we used our previously described14 (link) LC-MS/MS system which consists of a Nexera X2 UHPLC interfaced with an LC-MS 8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Chromatography was accomplished using an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters, Milford, USA) maintained at 40 °C during analysis.
Chromatographic analysis of CA, MCA and their stable isotope labeled internal standards was achieved using 2% methanol containing 0.5 g/L PFOA for 4 min as mobile phase. The methanol concentration was increased to 85% at 4 min and to 95% at 6 min using linear gradient. A 2 min column re-conditioning step with 2% methanol containing 0.5 g/L PFOA was included after each injection. A constant flow rate of 400 μL/min was used in all experiments.
Analysis by MS/MS was in the positive ion mode using argon as collision gas with collision energy of 22 eV, capillary voltage of 3.4 kV and cone voltage of 35 V. Desolvation temperature of 120 °C and ion source temperature of 350 °C were applied. Detection was in the multiple reaction monitoring mode with m/z of 485 > 151 and 489 > 151 for CA and d4-CA, respectively. MCA and d3-MCA were detected using m/z 499 > 151 and 502 > 151 as previously described12 ,14 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!