Falcon tube
Falcon tubes are conical centrifuge tubes commonly used in life science laboratories for various sample preparation and storage applications. They are made of high-quality polypropylene materials and are available in a range of sizes, typically from 15 to 50 milliliters. Falcon tubes provide a secure and reliable container for the safe handling and processing of biological samples.
Lab products found in correlation
24 protocols using falcon tube
Biospecimen Collection for Oxidative Stress
Seed Protein Extraction and Isolation
Expansion and Serum-Free Conditioning of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Monitoring Nutrient Dynamics in Hydroponic Systems
Concentration of Pi was evaluated via inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) as described by Garcés-Ruiz et al. (2017 (link)). For , samples were first diluted 50 times with Milli-Q water and then analyzed via ionic chromatography system (IC, DIONEX, DX 120). The quantification was analyzed under ultraviolet-visible (UV/VIS) spectrophotometry detection between 200 and 220 nm. The limit of detection was <100 ppb.
Quantifying Root Colonization by Mycorrhizal Fungi
Fecal Cortisol Metabolite Analysis
The frozen fecal samples were thawed for 30 min at room temperature. The 0.5-g wet feces of each sample was vortexed on a multi-vortex (VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany; Tube Rotator) for 30 min with 5-ml 80% methanol (Avantor, Griesheim, Germany; J.T. Baker® Chemicals) and centrifuged at 2,500 × g for 15 min at room temperature. The supernatant was pipetted into a tube and stored at −20°C until analysis. 11,17-DOA was analyzed using the group-specific 11-oxoetiocholanolone enzyme immunoassay (EIA) from Möstl and Palme (Labcode 72a, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria). Extraction and EIA were carried out as described by Palme and Möstl (38 ). Statistical analysis of 11,17-DOA concentration was carried out for days 2, 3, and 5 of each experimental period (B, T1, T2, T3).
Investigating Biogenic Amine Production in Brine Microbiota
Wild Boar Population Sampling Protocol
The questions on population characteristics [24 ] are given in Table
The distribution of the 30 wild boar populations in the respective risk factor category, based on the answers in a questionnaire that accompanied the samples
Risk factors | Number (%) of populations in each category |
---|---|
Feeding intensity (feeding places/10 km2) | |
< 3 | 7 (23.3) |
3–5 | 15 (50.0) |
5–10 | 3 (10.0) |
> 10 | 5 (16.7) |
Years since establishment of population (years) | |
< 3 | 1 (3.3) |
3–5 | 3 (10.0) |
5–7 | 4 (13.3) |
7–10 | 5 (16.7) |
> 10 | 17 (56.7) |
Yearly harvest/10 km2 (animals) | |
< 5 | 6 (20.0) |
5–15 | 12 (40.0) |
15–30 | 3 (10.0) |
30–50 | 5 (16.7) |
> 50 | 4 (13.3) |
Handling of slaughter waste | |
Made unavailable for wild boars | 11 (36.7) |
Left out in the forest | 19 (63.3) |
Isolation of Liver-Derived Cells
Thermal Stress Exposure in Zebrafish
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!