The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using maia 3 lmh

1

SEM Evaluation of Material Surface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The shape and surface morphology of MS were evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (TESCAN MAIA 3 LMH, Shanghai, China). The samples were mounted onto stubs using a double sided adhesive tape and were sputter-coated with gold prior to taking pictures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fly Ash Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH of the fly ash was measured using a calibrated pH meter (Thermo Orion, Waltham, MA, USA) and the morphology of the fly ash was characterized using a scanning electron microscope (TESCAN MAIA3LMH, Czech Republic). The physical and chemical properties of the fly ash, including the heavy metal content (Pb, Hg, Cr, Cd and As), were also determined. Heavy metal elements in the fly ash were measured by microwave digestion coupled with plasma mass spectrometry (ICAP6300; Mao et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrochemical Synthesis of Graphene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The graphene used in this study was prepared in-house by an electrochemical method (Chen et al., 2022b ). In brief, graphite was used as both the anode and cathode with distilled water as the electrolyte. The graphite electrode was electrolyzed and oxidized by a high-frequency pulse current to prepare graphene oxide. Through the action of an electrochemical electric field, external electrolyte ions (molecules) were inserted into the layered materials, like liquid phase stripping, while an electric field force was applied to drive electrolyte molecules to intercalate into the graphite cathode directly in an electrochemical manner. Thus, the graphite layer spacing became larger, and the van der Waals forces between the layers became weaker. Graphene was thus prepared by electrochemical stripping of graphite using a nonoxidizing method. The characteristics of graphene were analyzed by UV-visible and Raman spectroscopy (Horiba, LabRAM HR Evolution). Raman spectra were obtained using a Renishaw inVia Qontor with a 532-nm excitation laser. Graphene morphology was examined by SEM (Tescan MAIA3 LMH) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN TMP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Silver Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of silver products was characterized by using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (TESCAN MAIA3 LMH, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The crystal and composition of the products were determined by X-ray diffractometry (Shimadzu XRD-6100, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation, and data were collected over the 2θ range from 20° to 80° at a scanning step of 0.1°. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of the carbon cloth under different conditions was recorded on a FTIR spectrometer (BRUKER TENSOR II, Germany) over the scan range of 400–4000 cm−1. The carbon cloth samples to be characterized by FTIR were ground and tested by KBr tablet pressing method. The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was performed in 1 mM silver nitrate on an electrochemical workstation (CS310, Corrtest Instruments, China) with a three-electrode configuration. The sweep speed is 10 mV s−1 and scanning range is from 1.2 V to 0.6 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode (SHE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Ni(OH)x/Cu Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology was analyzed by field emission SEM (TESCAN MAIA3LMH) and TEM (Talos F200X). XRD patterns were recorded on a Shimadzu XRD-6100 with Cu Kα radiation. XPS spectra were collected on a Thermo Fisher ESCALAB Xi+ X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. All the XPS data were calibrated by shifting the C 1s peaks to 284.8 eV. The Raman spectra were measured on a Renishaw inVia Qontor Ramna microscope using laser excitation wavelength of 633 nm for copper and copper oxide detection and 532 nm for Ni(OH)x species detection. The concentration of nitrate in the electrolyte was quantified on a Thermo Scientific Dionex Integrion. The EPR measurements were performed on a JEOL JES-FA200 spectrometer. The 1H NMR spectra were measured on a AVANCE III HD 600 MHz NMR spectrometer. The mass spectra were collected on a GCMS-QP2020NX Shimadzu instrument. The contents of Ni and Cu elements in the Ni(OH)x/Cu samples were measured on a NexION 350D inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Hydrogel Structural Analysis by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structural features of the hydrogel freeze-dried were observed by SEM (TESCAN MAIA 3 LMH, Shanghai, China). The samples were mounted onto stubs using a double sided adhesive tape and were sputter-coated with gold prior to taking pictures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Graphene Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The graphene used in this study was prepared by high-frequency AC pulse method [19 (link)]. The size distribution of the graphene particles was measured in a Mastersizer 3000 (Malvern Instruments Ltd. UK). The characteristics of the graphene were analyzed using ultraviolet-visible and Raman spectroscopy (HORIBA, LabRAM HR Evolution). Raman spectra were obtained using a Renishaw inVia™ Qontor with a 532 nm excitation laser. The morphology of the graphene was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; TESCAN MAIA 3 LMH) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM; TecnaiG2F20 S-TWIN TMP). The C/O ratio of graphene was determined by X-ray energy-dispersion spectroscopy (EDS) (OXFORD INSTRUMENTS; INCAx-act).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Graphene Characterization: SEM and Raman Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the chemicals and reagents used in this study were analytically pure. Graphene suspension was produced by our laboratory as previously described [24 (link)]. In order to verify the quality, the graphene used in this paper was further characterized by scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy. To obtain the morphology, graphene suspension was vacuum freeze-dried and observed with scanning electron micro-scope (SEM, TESCAN, MAIA 3 LMH). A drop of graphene solution was wind-dried on concave slide for detection of Raman spectra using Renishaw inVia™ Qontor with a 532 nm excitation laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Graphene-based Electrochemical Biosensor for CA19-9 Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following were used in this study: graphene (XFNANO, Nanjing China, with a diameter of 0.5 μm–5 μm, thickness of 0.8 nm, and purity of 99%), BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China, product no. V900933), glutaraldehyde (GA, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China, no. G7776), N-ethyl-N′-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China, no. 03449), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China, no. 130672), 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China, no. M3671), ethanolamine (MEA, Aladin, Shanghai, China, E103810), anti-CA19-9 antibody (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA, GTX635391), CA19-9 protein (Fitzgerald, Louisville, KY, USA, 30-AC15), normal human serum (Solarbio, Beijing, China, SL010), a CA19-9 ELISA test kit (Bio-Swarmp, Beijing, China, HM10541), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL JEM-2100Plus, Tokyo, Japan), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (TESCAN MAIA3 LMH, Brno, Czech Republic). All electrochemical measurements were performed using an electrochemical workstation (Metrohm Dropsens STAT-I 400, Asturias, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Graphene Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Graphene was obtained and generated in our lab. The characteristics of graphene were analyzed by using ultraviolet-visible absorption spectrogram and Raman spectroscopy (HORIBA, LabRAM HR Evolution). The Raman spectra were obtained using Renishaw inVia™ Qontor with a 532-nm excitation laser. The morphology of graphene was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, TESCAN MAIA 3 LMH) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, TecnaiG2F20 S-TWIN TMP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!