The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using d max 2550vb pc

1

Characterization of LP-MnO2/CCMC Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of LP-MnO2/CCMC
composites was demonstrated by field emission SEM (Hitachi, S4800)
and TEM (JEM 2100, JEOL). The crystalline structures and chemical
compositions of composites were investigated by XRD (Rigaku D/max2550VB/PC,
Cu Kα1, λ = 1.541 Å), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy,
and XPS (ESCALAB 250, Thermo Fisher spectrometer). The molecular structure
of LP-MnO2/CCMC samples was studied by Raman spectrum tests
(Rigaku D/max 2550VB/PC, Cu Kα1, λ = 1.541 Å).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Fe3O4@C Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structures of the Fe3O4@C nanocomposite and pure C sample were studied by a powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD, RIGAKU, D/MAX 2550 VB/PC, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out on an ESCALab 250Xi spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) with an Al Kα source and the C 1s peak as the internal standard at 284.8 eV. The morphologies and texture of the samples were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan), and the element distribution was investigated with an energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) detector (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan). Raman spectra were conducted on an Invia Micro-Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, London, United Kingdom) with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. Thermogravimetric measurements (TGA, NETZSCH TG209F1, Selb, Germany) were employed to determine the loading of carbon in Fe3O4@C in air.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Crystalline Analysis of CCLSC and EHSC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline properties of CCLSC and EHSC samples were analyzed by an X-ray diffraction system (D/Max2550VB+/PC, Rigaku Corporation, Rigaku, Japan), following the method of Yin et al. (2018) [15 (link)]. The X-ray diffractogram was obtained at a scanning speed of 5°/min and a step size of 0.02. The resulting XRD spectra were analyzed using JADE 5.0 software (Materials Data Inc., Livermore, CA, USA) to calculate the percentage of relative crystallinity (C1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Catalyst Characterization Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallite sizes and morphologies of the solid catalyst were characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD) on Rigaku D/max2550VB/PC with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm, 100 mA, 45 kV). The scanning range was 10–80° (2θ) with a rate of 0.02° s−1. Surface elements were measured using an Edax Falcon energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The pore size distribution and surface area of catalysts were obtained via the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method on Micromeritrics ASAP-2400.14 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of GO and rGO/TiO2 Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and microstructure of the GO and rGO/TiO2 nanocomposites were characterized on the scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Regulus8230), transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-2100) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM; TecnaiG2F20). The crystalline structure of samples was observed by X-ray diffraction (XRD; RIGAKU, D/max-2550VB + /PC) equipped with Cu Ka radiation (18 kW, 10° ≤ 2θ ≤ 90°). The chemical composition of the membranes was characterized by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific, Escalab 250Xi) provided with Al Kα source and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; Bruker, VERTEX70) using KBr tabletting method. The phase structure was observed by laser Raman spectrometer (Renishaw inVia-Reflex) using a 532 nm laser line in the wavelength range of 100–3,000 cm−1 at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TiO2 Film Characterization by XRD, AFM, and CA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase characterization of the TiO2 films deposited on silicon substrates at different working pressures with RF power of 150 W, with and without bias, was carried out by X-ray diffraction (XRD), using CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm) for 2θ values ranging from 20° to 80°. The diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku D/max 2550 VB/PC, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) was operated at 40 kV and 200 mA with a scanning speed of 8°/min at 2θ steps of 0.020°. The angle of the incident beam was 0.9°. The surface topography of the said TiO2 films, deposited under the same conditions, was characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM, Nanoscope 3A, DI, USA) and the root-mean-square (RMS) roughness was estimated by an image analysis software called Nanoscope®III. The wettability of the films' surface was observed through water contact angle measurements, using contact angle measurement equipment (OCA 20, Dataphysics, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The apparent topography of the prepared materials was determined by employing the scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-5600 LV, Tokyo, Japan) at the start and the constituent elements were observed by a co-configured energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, 20.0 kV). The crystal phases of prepared electrodes were used for the identification by the X-ray diffraction technology (XRD, Rigaku D/MAX-2550VB/PC, Tokyo, Japan). The functional groups and metal bonds contained in the sample were determined for the identification using the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Nicolet Nexus 470, Massachusetts, America).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Porous DPS Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and pore sizes of DPS particles were observed via field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; SU8010, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Talos F200S, Waltham, MA, USA). The crystalline structure, porous structure and specific surface area were analyzed and evaluated using X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/max-2550VB+/PC, Rigaku, Japan), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXSess mc2, Graz, Austria) and N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms (Quadrasorb-SI, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Wheat Bran Crystalline Structure Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline structure of the wheat bran was measured using an X-ray diffractometer (D/Max2550VB/PC, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), according to the method of Zhang et al. [24 ].
An appropriate amount of wheat bran was pressed into a sheet and then the sheet was scanned with Cu-Kα radial under 40 kV and 30 mA and at a diffraction angle (2θ) that ranged from 5° to 40° at 2°/min in steps of 0.02°. Then, the crystallinity index (CI) of the wheat bran was calculated using Equation (2): Crystallinity index (%)=I002IamI002×100 
where I002 is the maximum intensity of the diffraction angle and Iam is the diffraction intensity at 2θ = 18°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Cs2SnCl6:Ce Phosphor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical states of Cs, Sn, Ce and Cl were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher, Basingstoke, UK). The XRD patterns of the sample were measured by an X-ray diffractometer (D/MAX 2550 VB/PC, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The doping concentration of Ce3+ was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-AES, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The reflectance and fluorescence spectra of the samples were measured by an UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a molecular fluorescence spectrometer (Fluorolog-3-P, Jobin Yvon, Paris, France). The fluorescence quantum efficiency and fluorescence lifetime of the Cs2SnCl6: Ce were determined by a fluorescence spectrometer with an integrating sphere (FLS980, Edinburgh instrument Ltd., Livingston, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!