The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Multiphysics 5.2a

Manufactured by Comsol
Sourced in United States

Multiphysics 5.2a is a comprehensive simulation software for modeling physics-based problems across various engineering disciplines. It provides a unified environment for defining and solving complex coupled-physics problems, including structural mechanics, fluid dynamics, electromagnetics, heat transfer, and more.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

28 protocols using multiphysics 5.2a

1

Modeling Spherical Compound Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The spherical aggregate was modeled as a sphere with isotropic continuous material properties with diffusion coefficient D and uptake rate k. The ambient compound concentration was set as a Dirichlet boundary condition for the domain partial differential equation (PDE). Discretization refinement studies were performed until convergence was achieved. To solve the PDEs, COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Finite Element Modeling of Plasmonic Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three-dimensional finite element
modeling (FEM) of the structure was performed using COMSOL Multiphysics
5.2a. The simulated structure is composed of a 250 nm thick film with
5 periodic corrugations surrounding a central hole. The single-crystalline
Ag optical properties used for calculations were measured from the
fabricated films using spectroscopic ellipsometry (V-VASE, J. A. Woollam
Co.). The model was excited with monochromatic TE and TM polarized
fields and surrounded by cylindrical perfectly matched layers. For
hexagonal bull’s-eye structures, the full geometry was simulated,
whereas for the rectangular structure a quarter of the geometry with
appropriate boundary conditions for the two orthogonal polarizations
was sufficient. Far-field plots of a polarized input were obtained
and postprocessed using Matlab to generate response for unpolarized
or arbitrarily polarized inputs. Transmission versus polarization plots were obtained by selecting an NA = 0.06 from
the calculated far-field plots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Kármán Vortex Street Simulation in Comsol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Simulations
of the Kármán vortex street were conducted in Comsol
Multiphysics 5.2a. Single-phase laminar flow model was chosen and
the medium (air) was set as incompressible. The density and dynamic
viscosity of the air were set as 1.184 kg/m3 and 1.84 ×
10–5 Pa·s (25 °C). Except for the inlet
and outlet of the channel, all other boundaries were set as a wall
without slip. The inlet velocity of the channel was controlled by
a piecewise function which could increase the velocity every 5 s and
stay at a certain speed of 10 s. The initial velocity and pressure
inside the tunnel were set as zero. Finally, a time-dependent solver
was chosen to conduct the simulation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Modeling Transmembrane Potential in LEPD Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a to compute the transmembrane potential in the LEPD system. Simulations were performed using the AC/DC electric currents module. The schematic of the geometry and the details of the material properties and that of the pulse applied are specified in fig. S4 of the Supplementary Materials. The governing equations of the current conservation and boundary condition that were used are .(σV)+.εVt=0 n.J=0 where σ is the conductivity (siemens per meter), V is the potential (volts), ε is the permittivity of the relevant domain, n is the surface unit normal vector, and J (ampere per meter squared) is the electric flux vector. The boundary condition of Eq. 2 was used for emulating insulating interfaces in the system, while a nonzero electric potential was applied to the dipped electrode, and ground was applied to the bottom gold electrode (fig. S4). We modeled the cell membrane in Eq. 3 as a thin resistive material with an effective contact impedance n.J=1d(σ+εt) Vm where Vm (volts) is the transmembrane potential and d is the thickness of the cell membrane (meters). A physics-controlled mesh of COMSOL was used to discretize the entire geometry. The simulation was carried out for the entire duration of the pulse, and a backward Euler scheme was used for the time discretization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Simulating Microfluidic Mixer Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To model the behavior of the fluids in the microfluidic devices, the micromixer unit was
simulated using a COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a finite element method (FEM) analysis. The
simulations were based on three constraints: (i) the continuity equation, (ii) the
Navier–Stokes equation, and (iii) the convection–diffusion equation as described in more
detail in the supplementary material. The solution to the equations was obtained in two
steps: first, the fluid flow field in the channel was computed ( 7.7×106 degrees of freedom), and this flow field was subsequently
used to compute the analyte convection and diffusion along the channel ( 6.4×106 degrees of freedom). For simplicity, single phase flow
simulation was implemented with fluid properties similar to aqueous buffers: density of ρ=1000  kg m 3 and dynamic viscosity of μ=103  Pa s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a was used to create 2D models of the 3 systems described in Fig. 3. Figure 3C shows an example of one of the devices and the locations were the velocity profile are taken. The fluid was considered to be incompressible, stationary in the laminar regime and had the physical properties of water at 293.15 K. The laminar inlet flow was parabolic with an average velocity of 0.12 m/s. Outlets 1 to 4 were fixed at specific outflow conditions and the outflow from outlet 5 was based on pressure. A no-slip boundary condition was applied. A mesh dependency study was performed and the results were independent of mesh size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Finite Element Simulation of Protein-Salt Channel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A finite elements software
is used to simulate the system (COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a with microfluidics
module and optimization module). In one dimension, a Dirichlet boundary
condition is used to fix the protein and salt concentrations at the
inlet of the channel, and a Neumann boundary condition is used on
the closed end. In two and three dimensions, the main channel is simulated,
allowing the main channel flow to enter the dead-end, and allowing
a local depletion to occur.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanopore Conductance Simulation with Nanoparticle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanopore conductance simulations with and without the presence of an insulating nanoparticle in the sensing zone was performed using COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microfluidic Vascular Network Simulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
COMSOL Multiphysics®5.2a was used to perform finite element simulations for the interstitial flow inside a developed microvascular network. Thresholded vessel images were smoothed and processed into outlines using ImageJ software, then converted into a .dxf file using Img2cad software. After the vessel outline was closed, and redundant fragments were removed using AutoCAD software, the complete vessel outline was scaled and integrated into the geometry of a microfluidic device. The refined CAD vessel diagram was then built into a 2D free and porous media flow model in COMSOL Multiphysics. Water was chosen to model the flow of culture media through the vascular network. The porosity and permeability of fibrin gel were estimated to be 0.99 and 1.5 × 10−13 m2, respectively, based on our published result.18 (link) Inlet/outlet were designated at the media reservoir boundaries, with pressure specified as 98 and 0.001 Pa, respectively, based on calculated gravity-driven pressure difference in the device, as previously described.18 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plasmonic Gap Field Distribution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Theoretical simulation with a model based on the geometry parameters of the tip used in the experiment were carried out to calculate the distribution of local fields in the strongly coupled and localized plasmonic gap between the Ag tip and Au substrate. The scanning electron microscope image of the Ag tip shows a tip radius of 25 nm and the cone angle of 50°. COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a based on the finite element method was used for the computational simulations. The p-polarized light with an incidence angle of 20° was introduced by a user-defined port (the blue part in Supplementary Fig. 3). The perfect matched layer (PML) boundary conditions were adopted for all other outer interfaces. The refractive index of water was set to 1.33. Optical constants for Au and Ag were obtained from the literature55 ,56 . All materials were assumed to be isotropic and nonmagnetic in the simulation. Extremely fine meshing with edge length smaller than the skin depth in the metal material was adopted to discretize the structure and to ensure convergence and reproducibility of the simulations. The minimum edge length of the tetrahedral mesh element was as small as 0.2 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!