The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using it300

1

Morphological Characterization of Ketamine-Loaded PLGA Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological evaluation of the sustained-release ketamine-loaded PLGA microparticles was performed using scanning electron microscopy (Jeol IT300, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) to determine shape and surface morphology. The microparticles were sputter-coated with platinum using an Auto Smart Coater (JFC-1300, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) before examination using scanning electron microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Graphene Oxide Characterization by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High resolution TEM imaging (FEI, Hillsboro, USA) was performed using 120 kV Tecnai T12 electron microscope equipped with side-mounted Olympus VELITA (2 K × 2 K) CCD camera. GO-H2O and GO-Met-H2O coated carbon grids were imaged at 120 kV at different magnification range 4200×–63,000×. Similarly GO solution was directly deposited on Cu-grids without any carbon support films for negative staining purposes. Diffraction pattern of GO monolayer and multilayers were recorded at diffraction mode using T12 microscope. Furthermore, the GO-coated Cu-grids were analyzed with JEOL IT-300 (JEOL. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) scanning electron microscopy. Data were collected at 30 kV high vacuum mode at 10,000× magnification using secondary electron detector (SED).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dentin Surface Characterization by SEM-EDS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The same samples were dried at 37 °C for 48 h, and sample segments were fixed in stubs with the dentin walls upwards. The samples were coated with two thin layers of evaporated carbon in high vacuum by a desk carbon coater and viewed at a magnification of 1500× with a field-emission SEM (JEOL IT-300, JEOL. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). To measure the atomic percentages of the carbon, oxygen, phosphorus, and calcium levels in the dentin samples, an EDS analysis was carried out in conjunction with SEM using iridium software at an accelerating voltage of 20 KeV (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Fungal Conidia Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conidia production was estimated for CHL and MET leaf, stem, and root extract treated cultures (500 µg/mL). From the eight replicates of each condition, four mycelia were collected from the CCM microplates used in the AF accumulation assay, and individually washed three times in a 0.1% (v/v) Tween20® aqueous solution by vortexing 1 min. The spore suspensions were then washed three times with a 80% (v/v) ethanol solution and conidia concentration was then determined with a Burker chamber. The remaining four CHL and MET leaf, stem, and root extract treated cultures from AF accumulation plates were observed using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) JEOL IT 300, in high vacuum mode. Samples were fixed for 4 h in 3% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, acetone dehydrated (from 30% to 100% water/acetone solutions), critical point dried, and coated with a thin layer of gold by means of a Sputter Coater “Agar”. Observations were conducted at an acceleration voltage of 10.0 kV and at a 450× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Elemental Analysis of Mucus Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the histochemical analyses, fresh lateral and ventral mucus from four individuals was collected on standard SEM stubs, consisting of aluminium and copper (Co. Gröpl, Austria) until the whole stub was covered. All samples were then air‐dried and analysed using energy dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) with the x‐ray microanalysis software (Software Team, Version 4.3, Co. Ametek, Germany) in the SEM JEOL IT 300 at 20 kV. The collecting time for the elements in the mucus was set to 30 s for the selected areas and 4 hr for dot mapping, both with a ~ 30% dead time. At least 5–7 point measurements from each mucus type (lateral and ventral) and each of the four individuals were taken, and these are summarised in Table 2 as a range between minimum and maximum values. For the comparison of the different mucus types, atom % (at.%) was used, values below 0.1 at.% are ignored due to the detection limit of this semiquantitative method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genome Skimming of Penetrantia Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty‐seven specimens from 11 different localities were collected for genome skimming including nine different Penetrantia and 18 additional ctenostome specimens (Table 1). One additional penetrantiid specimen (Penetrantia sp.) was collected in Helgoland, Germany (54°08.339′ N 7°52.298′ E) for sanger sequencing of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) gene (OR632352) and genetic distance analysis only (see below). Samples were either collected in the intertidal zone by hand or in shallow subtidal areas by dredging. All samples were fixed either in 96% or absolute ethanol and stored at 4°C until further investigation. Stereomicroscopic pictures were taken with a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DsRi2 microscope camera, or with a Hirox RH‐2000 3D digital microscope (Hirox Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Scanning electron microscopic images were generated using a JEOL IT 300 (JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) with a secondary detector at 10–25 KeV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural Analysis of Gelatin Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structural morphology of fabricated in situ cross-linked gelatin nanofibers was analysed using SEM (JEOL IT300). The nanofibers spun on an aluminium foil were cut into small pieces and were fixed on aluminium stubs (12mm) with sticky carbon tapes for observation. All the samples were sputter coated with the silver of thickness 15nm using sputter coater (SC7620, Quorum Technologies, East Grinstead, UK), before performing the SEM analysis. The fiber diameters of the fabricated scaffolds were quantified by using Image J. For this, 20 measurements were taken from each scaffolds and the average fiber diameter was obtained from the histograms ( Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Adsorbent Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopic images were obtained from an FEI Quanta 200 SEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and Jeol IT-300 tungsten scanning electron microscopy equipped with secondary backscattering electron detectors and an Oxford energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis external probe. Samples were coated with gold using a Quorum Q150R sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, East Sussex, UK). The coating thickness was precisely controlled at 5 nm using the film thickness monitor option of the Quorum Q150R sputter. Functional group analysis on the surface of adsorbents was obtained from a PerkinElmer Spectrum 400 FT-IR/FT-NIR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) recording from 4000 to 500 cm−1. Thermal analysis of adsorbents was elucidated using a PerkinElmer TGA 4000 thermogravimetric analyzer (Waltham, USA). Centrifugation was accomplished employing a CL10 ThermoScientific centrifuge (Johannesburg, South Africa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunolabeling and Imaging of Microtubules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After fixation, the samples were washed 5 times with PBST [1× PBS, 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween-20] for 10 min. The samples were blocked in 5% BSA in PBST for 1 h at RT. Primary antibody (1:500 dilution, mouse Anti-α-Tubulin Cat # T9026, Sigma-Aldrich) incubation was performed in a blocking solution (1% BSA in PBST) for 24–36 h at 4 °C. The samples were washed with PBST for 5 × 5 min, after which samples were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:250 dilution; Goat anti-Mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 594 Cat # A-11032, ThermoFisher) diluted in blocking solution for overnight at 4 °C. Then, the samples were washed with PBST for 5 × 10 min. Imaging was performed on Leica TCS SP8 DLS and Leica DMi8 confocal microscopes. Sample preparation for scanning electron microscopy was performed as in (Kraus et al. 2016 (link)); SEM imaging was performed using the JEOL IT 300 scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Investigating Ni Adsorption in Root Tips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the Ni adsorption as well as fluctuations in Ni caused by the different treatments along the root tip, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was employed. Fresh root tips (1 cm) were affixed with sticky carbon foil on aluminum stubs and air dried at room temperature for 24 h. The dry samples were carbon-coated (Leica Med 020). The root tips were then analyzed in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Jeol IT 300) and semi-quantitative measurements of element contents were taken as line scans along the sample, starting from the tip and traveling over a distance of at least 600 μm in 5-μm steps. The magnification was set to × 160. The detector and supported TEAM software were both from the EDAX company.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!