The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Uv vis 1601 pc

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The UV-Vis 1601 PC is a compact, high-performance ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer designed for routine analysis. It features a wavelength range of 190 to 1100 nm and can be used for a variety of applications in research and quality control laboratories.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using uv vis 1601 pc

1

Rhizosphere Organic Acid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To acquire the rhizosphere, the dug roots were progressively stirred to separate them from the bulk soils. Measurements were made of the concentrations of phenolic, oxalic and citric acids [38 (link),39 (link)]. Organic acids (citric and oxalic acids) were gathered in 0.1% phosphoric acid that also contained butylated hydroxyanisole, using ribitol as an internal reference. Filtrates were used for HPLC quantification using a LaChrom L-7455 diode array (Merck-Hitachi, Barcelona, Spain), as described by de Sousa et al. [40 (link)], following centrifugation. According to Zhang et al. [41 (link)], the phenolic concentration was calculated using spectrophotometry (Shimadzu UV-Vis 1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rhizosphere Soil Analysis: Phenolics, Citric Acid, and Heavy Metal Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After gently shaking the roots, 10 g of rhizosphere soil was swirled in double distilled water. The total phenolic content of the soil extract was determined spectrophotometrically using Zhang et al. (2006) (link) technique. Citric acid was determined by HPLC, as described by De Sousa et al. (2016) (link). According to Zhang et al. (2006) (link), ten grams of rhizosphere were forcefully mixed in distilled water, and the filtrates were used to spectrophotometrically assess the phenolic content (Shimadzu UV-Vis 1601 PC, Japan). To measure the negative effect of heavy metals on microbial population in the soil, ten grams of each soil sample was added to 90 mL of 0.1% (w/v) solution of sodium pyrophosphate. After homogenization for 30 min, this solution was decimally diluted (10−1 to 10−7) and aliquots of the resulting solutions were plated on appropriate culture media. After incubation at 25 or 30°C, for up to 10 days, the colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Soil Chemical Properties Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical properties of the soil (pH and electrical conductivity) were measured in diluted aqueous soil extract (1:5 w/v) using a pH meter (AD 3000) and a conductivity meter (Jenway 3305), respectively. Following Zhang et al. [31 (link)]), the phenolic content was estimated spectrophotometrically (Shimadzu UV-Vis 1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan). Twenty grams of soil were stirred vigorously with bi-distilled water followed by filtration and the filtrate was used for estimation of phenolic content. The content of mineral nutrients in soil rhizosphere were determined by shaking the excavated root very gently to separate from the bulk soil; then, the soil attached to the fine roots (2 mm thick layer) was obtained by brushing. About 20 g of soil rhizosphere were extracted in aqueous HNO3 solution (80%) and were detected by using ICP-MS (Finnigan Element XR, Scientific, Beremen, Germany) [32 ]. A total of 20 g of soil was mixed in a flask with 100 mL of distilled water and shaken for 12 h. Then, the soil extract was filtered and used to determine organic acid and phenolic compounds [33 (link)]. The percentage of CaCO3 was estimated according to Brown et al. [34 (link)]. The contents of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) were measured by CN element analyzer (NC-2100, Carlo Erba Instruments, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Quantification of Rhizosphere Organic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dug roots were gradually agitated to isolate them from the bulk soils in order to acquire the rhizosphere. The levels citric acid, oxalic acid, and phenolic content were measured [54 (link),55 (link)]. Using ribitol as an internal standard, organic acids (citric and oxalic acids) were collected in 0.1% phosphoric acid that also included butylated hydroxyanisole. As stated by de Sousa et al. [54 (link)], filtrates were employed for HPLC quantification using a LaChrom L-7455 diode array (Merck-Hitachi, Barcelona, Spain) after centrifugation. According to Zhang et al. [56 (link)], the phenolic content was spectrophotometrically estimated (Shimadzu UV-Vis 1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Phytochemical Analysis of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid-N2 was used for grinding plant materials that extracted in 80% ice-cold ethanol (2 mL) using a MagNALyser. The TAC of the extracts was determined with Ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assay by a microplate reader at 600 nm [60 ]. Trolox was used as standard. Reduced glutathione (GSH) and reduced ascorbate (ASC) were determined with HPLC analysis [61 (link)]. After reduction with DTT, the total ascorbate (ASC + DHA) and glutathione (GSH + GSSG) content were evaluated. Ethanol (80%, v/v) was used for the extraction of phenolic compounds. Afterward, a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-Vis 1601 PC, Japan) was used for polyphenol [62 (link)] and flavonoid [63 ] measurements. Following hexane extraction, extracts (CentriVap concentrator, Labconco, KA, USA) were taken for tocopherols detection using HPLC (Shimadzu, Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands; normal phase conditions, Particil Pac 5 µm column material, length 250 mm, i.d. 4.6 mm). In total, 5 ppm of dimethyl tocol was applied as an internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chlorophyll Content Quantification in Tissue Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaves from 2× and 4× tissue culture plantlets growing for 20, 40, and 70 days after planting (20, 40, and 70 DAP) were weighed and quickly ground with liquid nitrogen. Leaves were placed in a test tube with an appropriate amount of acetone extract (V95% acetone: V5% anhydrous ethanol = 2:1) and placed in 28 °C for 24 h in darkness to fully extract the leaf chlorophyll. Before the determination, the extraction solution was thoroughly mixed. The absorption values of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were measured by an ultraviolet spectrophotometer (UV-VIS 1601-PC SHIMADZU, Kioto, Japan) under different wavelength conditions [55 (link)]. The maximum absorption peak wavelength was 663 nm for chlorophyll a and 645 nm for chlorophyll b. Three biological replicates per sample were used. The chlorophyll content was calculated as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Lithium Carbonate Encapsulation in Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The drug loading and encapsulation efficiency was determined by separating the nanoparticles from the aqueous medium containing free lithium carbonate by centrifugation at 20,000 rpm at 4 °C for 60 min. The amount of free lithium carbonate in supernatant was quantified by measuring absorbance at 274 nm using a Shimadzu UV–vis (1601PC, Japan) spectrophotometer. Drug encapsulation and loading efficiency were then calculated using Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively. All measurements were performed in triplicate and observed in percentage (%). Drug encapsulation(%)=(Initial concentration of lithium carbonate-concentration of lithium carbonate in supernatant)Initial concentration of lithium carbonate×100
Loading Capacity(%)=(Total lithium carbonate-free lithium carbonate)×100Nano particle weight×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Soil Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heavy metals were determined by mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Finnigan Element XR, Scientific, Bremen, Germany), whereas Co and soil were extracted in HNO3/H2O (5:1). A digital pH meter (3000 CE) and a conductivity meter (Jenway 3305) were used to measure the pH and EC of the soil, respectively, in a soil–water extract (1:5 w/v). Using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV–Vis 1601 PC, Japan), phenolic acids measured set to 700 nm. About 20 g of soil was mixed with 100 ml of distilled water in a flask and shaken for 12 h. The phenolic content of the soil extract was then determined after filtration. Using gallic acid as a standard, the phenolic content of the soil was measured according to Zhang et al. (2006 (link)). According to Jackson (1962 (link)), the proportion of CaCO3 was calculated. According to Jones (2001 (link)), the organic matter (OM) was calculated. Mineral nutrients were extracted in a 5:1 solution of HNO3/H2O and analyzed using mass spectrometry ICP-MS, PerkinElmer SCIEX, ELAN DRC-e, Scientific, Bremen, Germany). A standard mixture of multi-element calibration standard 3 and no Hg was prepared in 1% nitric acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!