The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cinahl plus with full text

Manufactured by EBSCO

CINAHL Plus with Full Text is a comprehensive nursing and allied health literature database that provides full-text access to a wide range of journal articles, as well as indexing for additional journals, books, monographs, and more. It covers nursing, allied health, biomedicine, alternative/complementary medicine, and consumer health.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using cinahl plus with full text

1

Hamstring Muscle Architectural Adaptations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text via Ebsco, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and OpenGrey databases were searched for all the indicated date range. A combination of the following key terms were used for the database searches: ’Exercis*’, ’Training*’, ’Biceps Femoris’, ’Hamstring*’, ’Knee Flexors’, ’Posterior Thigh’, ’Semitendinosus’, ’Semimembranosus’, ’ACSA’, ’Architectur*’, ’Cross Sectional Area’, ’Cross-sectional Area’, ’Fascic*’, ’Fiber Length’, ’Fibre Length’, ’Pennat*’, ’Pinnat*’, ’Muscle Thickness’, ’Muscle Volume’, ’Muscle Structure’, ’Muscle Length’ and ’PCSA’. When applicable, relevant MeSH terms for ’exercise’ were added to the key terms during the database searches. When "OR" bullion operator was employed within the key term groups, "AND" bullion operator was used between the key term groups. The last search of the databases was conducted on 6 June 2021; all the database searches are shown in the S1 File.
The first author performed the database searches. Once the searches of PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text via Ebsco and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database were completed, citations were exported to the Endnotex9 citation manager [35 ]. The first author automatically removed duplicate citations through the Endnote citation manager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Search Strategies for Electronic Databases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The search strategy is shown in Additional file 1. Comprehensive search strategies were developed by an information specialist using a combination of subject headings and keywords and adapted for six electronic bibliographic databases. Searches were conducted in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (via Ovid, 1946 to May Week 1 2013), Embase (via Ovid, 1980 to 2013 Week 19), PsycINFO (via Ovid, 1806 to May Week 1 2013), Health and Psychosocial Instruments (HaPI; via Ovid, 1985 to April 2013), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (via EBSCOhost, 1937 to May 2013) and PubMed (1980 to June 2014). No language or publication-type restrictions were applied. References were downloaded into EndNote X4.0.2 (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Telemedicine for Hypertension in CKD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCO), PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Web of Science, and Dissertations and Theses Global (ProQuest). Searches employed both controlled vocabularies, such as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), and keywords representing concepts such as: (hypertension or blood pressure) AND (chronic kidney disease or chronic renal insufficiency) AND (telemedicine or virtual monitoring). The search was conducted by our medical librarian (L.H.) and the strategy was reviewed for completeness and accuracy using Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS)26 (link)
by a second research librarian. No limitations or filters were used, and search strategies were adapted for each database (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Database Search for Ergonomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Author (R.H.) conducted the database search. The following databases were searched: (1) PubMed, (2) Embase, (3) CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), (4) Scopus, for an ergonomics and health perspective, and (5) Web of Science Core Collection (including Science Citation Index Expanded, Emerging Sources Citation Index, and Social Sciences Citation Index), for a cross-disciplinary perspective. All databases were searched from inception to 03/17/2023 (Additional file 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Access to Maternal Care for Disabled Women in Africa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary studies that have a clear empirical base utilising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods published in peer-reviewed journals as well as in grey literature that address the research question will be included. All study designs would be included. An electronic search will be conducted in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE/Pubmed, CINAHL Plus with full text (EBSCO) and Africa-Wide information, Google Scholar and Proquest. Websites such as the World Health Organisation (WHO), UNICEF and governmental websites would be searched for policies and reports on access to maternal services for women with disabilities. Studies will be identified by searching literature that was published in any language and those studies that are translatable to English from January 2000 to December 2015.
Articles will also be searched through the “Cited by” search as well as citations included in the reference lists of included articles. The search terms will include maternal health, disability, health care, access, and Sub-Saharan Africa. Database-specific thesaurus terms (e.g. MeSH terms) as well as free-text terms will be used to search articles. After searching, the studies will be screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Smartphone Apps and Physical Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An electronic database search was conducted using Medline, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Sports Discus and EMBASE. Search terms described the population group (CVD); intervention (smartphone applications); and the key outcome (physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour) (S1 File. Full search strategy). Peer-reviewed, English language, full-text studies of any type were included if published since the launch of the first app stores in 2007 to 31 October 2020. Reference lists of eligible studies and review articles were also screened. When suitable research protocol papers were found, a specific search was conducted in attempt to find the associated results paper. Results were imported into Covidence Systematic Review Software (Vertias Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia, www.covidence.org) and duplicates were removed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Qualitative Exploration of Dyslexia Impacts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relevant literature was identified by using the results of a systematic literature review from 2014 of the same authors [1 (PubMed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24383435/">link)] and by performing new searches in the electronic bibliographic databases Business Source Ultimate (via Ebsco), Cinahl Plus with full text (via Ebsco), Embase (via Ovid), ERIC (via Ebsco), PsycInfo (via Ebsco), PubMed and Web of Science (Core Collection). The 2014 review considered literature from 1995 (the year in which the ADA was published) to 2013. For this review, only the qualitative studies from the 2014 review were used and they were subjected to the same procedure as the newer studies. The new systematic searches in the databases included studies published from 2013 (because that year was just partly covered in the 2014 review) untill January 2021 (the date limit for the search). The searches were focused on dyslexia, employment and qualitative research.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Search Strategy for Scoping Review

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Search strategies were developed iteratively in consultation with a professional medical librarian (AF). The following electronic databases were searched on January 12, 2021: CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCO), PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycINFO (EBSCO). Results were limited to English language only. The search strategies were tailored to each database combining keyword and controlled vocabulary terms. The search strategy for CINAHL Plus with Full Text is represented in Table 1. A final hand search and review of reference lists from relevant articles was completed as part of the search strategy. A grey literature search strategy was not developed as a component of this scoping review due to the volume of literature available from peer-reviewed sources. Given the robust nature of publications on this topic, the authors decided to focus the search as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Parental Technoference and Child Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The search strategy will aim to locate published studies. An initial discovery search of APA PsycInfo will be undertaken to identify articles on the topic. The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles, and the index terms used to describe the articles, will be used to develop a full search strategy focusing on three main concepts: parents, children, and technoference. Outcome terms related to child development and health will not be searched as searching outcomes has been shown to impact retrieval of relevant studies [39 (link)]. The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms, will be adapted for each included database and/or information source. A draft search strategy for APA PsycInfo is provided in Additional file 3. The reference list of all included sources of evidence will be screened for additional studies.
Ovid databases to be searched include the following: APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central), Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, JBI EBP Database, and Embase. CINAHL Plus with Full Text (Ebsco) and Scopus will also be searched.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cancer Self-Management Interventions for Older Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to present, including Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase (1947 to present), Ovid AMED (1985 to present), OVID PsycINFO (1806 to present), EBSCO CINAHL Plus with Full Text (1981 to present), EBSCO AgeLine, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest ASSIA, and ProQuest Sociological Abstracts to identify articles addressing cancer self-management interventions for and older adults with cancer. Search strategies were developed by an academic health science librarian (MG) in collaboration with the project team. The Medline search strategy was peer-reviewed by a second academic health science librarian not associated with the project; recommendations made by the reviewer were addressed by the team and incorporated prior to translating the search to additional databases. The search strategies were executed and translated using platform-specific syntax for each database, controlled vocabulary, and appropriate search fields. MeSH terms, Emtree terms, CINAHL headings, APA thesaurus terms, AMED thesaurus terms, and textwords were used to search the concepts of self-management, cancer, and older adults. No date, language, or study design limits were placed on the search. See Appendix 1 for Medline search strategies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!