The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Saturn 724 ccd

Manufactured by Rigaku

The Saturn 724+ CCD is a high-performance X-ray detector designed for crystallographic applications. It features a large active area, fast readout, and high signal-to-noise ratio, providing efficient data collection for a wide range of sample types and experimental conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using saturn 724 ccd

1

Structural and Electronic Characterization of Mg3Sb2 Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The single crystals were checked and oriented at room temperature by the white-beam backscattering Laue X-ray diffraction (XRD) method (Rigaku AFC7 plus Saturn 724 + CCD). For the polycrystalline samples, the XRD (Rigaku, Rint 2000, CuKα) and SEM (Hitachi, S-3400N, 15 kV) analyses were performed along parallel (//P) and vertical (⊥P) to the pressing direction to characterize the texture. To experimentally reveal the valence band structure, we carried out the angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements of Mg3Sb2 single crystals at the UE112-PGM2b beamline of the synchrotron radiation facility BESSY (Berlin) with 13 and 12 end stations, equipped with DA30L and R800 analyzers, respectively. The total energy resolution is about 15 meV while the angular resolution is 0.2°. The crystals were cleaved in situ and measured at 20 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were mounted, using Paratone oil, onto a nylon loop. Data were collected at 98(2) K using a Rigaku AFC12 / Saturn 724 CCD fitted with MoKα radiation (λ = 71075 Å). Low temperature data collection was accomplished with a nitrogen cold stream maintained by an X-Stream low-temperature apparatus. Data collection and unit cell refinement were performed using CrystalClear software.58 Data processing and absorption correction, giving minimum and maximum transmission factors, were accomplished with CrysAlisPro59 and SCALE3 ABSPACK,60 respectively. The structure was solved with the ShelXT61 structure solution program within Olex262 using direct methods and refined (on F2) with the ShelXL package63 using full-matrix, least-squares techniques. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All hydrogen atom positions were determined by geometry and refined by a riding model. The structure of 1d-Et was solved in the space group P1, although the true space group is most likely P1 . Attempts to refine 1d-Et in P1 did not produce chemically reasonable structures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single Crystal Growth and Characterization of DPA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For single crystal data analysis, large crystals of DPA are grown from saturated solution in chloroform. The crystal analysis was performed on Rigaku Saturn724 CCD at 113(2) K using MoKα with diffraction radiation wavelength of 0.71073 Å and graphite as monochromator. For fluorescence property investigation and device fabrication, single crystals of DPA were grown by a physical vapour transport technique. Samples for laser scanning confocal microscope were grown on a 22 mm × 22 mm cover slip, and FL pictures of the crystals was recorded by laser scanning confocal microscope (Olympus FV-1000-IX81) under mercury lamp with a CCD camera. Samples for XRD characterization was grown on OTS/SiO2/Si substrates, considering the coverage of crystals on substrates, the substrate was turned four times with each time a different edge facing the sublimation source. X-ray diffraction measurement was performed in reflection mode at 40 kV and 200 mA with Cu Ka radiation using a 2 kW Rigaku D/max-2500 X-ray diffractometer. Samples for TEM test were prepared by scratching crystals from OTS/SiO2/Si and then transferred to copper grid with supporting carbon membrane. TEM and SAED measurements were carried out on a JEOL 2010 (Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Solving Disordered Crystal Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray intensity data for the three compounds were collected on a Rigaku Saturn 724+ CCD diffractometer with graphite monochromatized Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The crystal structures were solved by direct methods using difference Fourier synthesis with SHELXTS24 , and refined by full-matrix least-squares method using the SHELXL-97 program25 . The non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms except for those of guest molecules were added according to theoretical models. To Dy-DDQ and Eu-DDQ, the solvent molecules and anion part of the structures were highly disordered and impossible to been found in the Fourier maps and fixed in the ideal position26 . To resolve this issue, the contribution of solvent and anionic electron density was removed by SQUEEZE routine in PLATON27 . The molecules removed were determined with elemental analysis and TG data. Crystal data and details of the structure determination for the three compounds are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

X-ray Diffraction Structural Analysis of Ni2 and Ni5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray
diffraction studies
were conducted for the suitable single-crystal of Ni2 and Ni5. Crystals were grown by the layering of heptane
into the solution of the corresponding complex in dichloromethane
at ambient temperature. The X-ray structural determination was carried
out on a Rigaku Saturn 724+ CCD diffractometer provided with graphite
monochromatic Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at
173(2) K. The cell parameters were obtained by a global refinement
of the positions of all the collected reflections. The intensities
for Lorentz and polarization effects were corrected out and an empirical
absorption was applied. The structures were resolved by the direct
methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2. All hydrogen atoms were placed in the calculated positions.
Structure solution and refinement were conducted by using SHELXT-97.21 (link) The free solvent molecules were squeezed with
PLATON software.22 (link) The details of the X-ray
structure determination data and structural refinements for Ni2 and Ni5 are provided in Table 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Crystalline Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystals of L2, L4, and L5 suitable for X-ray diffraction analyses were obtained from their heptane solution at room temperature overnight. Crystals of the complex Al1 suitable for the X-ray diffraction analyses were obtained from its toluene solution. X-ray studies were carried out on a Rigaku Saturn724 + CCD with graphite-monochromatic Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 173 (2) K. Cell parameters were obtained by global refinement of the positions of all collected reflections. Intensities were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects and empirical absorption. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2. All hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions. Structure solution and refinement were performed by using the SHELXL-2014 package.21 (link) Within the structure refinement of complex Al1, there were free solvent molecules that had no influence on the geometry of the main compounds. Therefore, the SQUEEZE option of the crystallographic program PLATON22 (link) was used to remove these free solvents from the structure. Details of the X-ray structure determinations and refinements are provided in Table S1. Details of the hydrogen-bonding interactions of ligands (L2, L4 and L5) are listed in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!