The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using pcdk9

1

Comprehensive Protein Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies and sources: CDK9, pCDK9, RNAPII, phospho-RNAPII, TGM2, Cyclin B1, Cyclin E1, and NUP98 (Cell Signaling Technology); CDC37, SPT5, Stomatin, PLK1, Cyclin A1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); BRD4, Cyclin T1 and GFP (Abcam); Caspase-8 (Enzo Life Sciences); β-Actin, pCDK9, Vimentin, and Flag (Sigma-Aldrich).
Reagents and sources: CellTiter-Blue Cell Viability assay and Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay (Promega); BrdU kit (Roche); Thymidine, 5-ethynyl uridine (EU), Azide-fluor 488 (Sigma-Aldrich); AnnexinV and 7AAD (BD); [γ-32P] ATP (3000Ci/mmol, Amersham Pharmacia); Trail, FasL (Enzo Life Sciences); PLA assay kit (Olink Biosciences); BAY1251152, Cisplatin, and Carboplatin (Selleckchem); BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber (Corning); Migration chamber (Ibidi); RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen), active GST-CDK9/Cyclin K (SRP5012, Sigma-Aldrich).
The following vectors were used: pCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459) V2.0 (62988, Addgene); p3xFlag-CMV-7.1 (E7533, Sigma); pGEX-5X-3 (28–9545-55, GE Healthcare) and pEGFP-C2 (6083-1, Clontech). All siRNAs and primers were from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Protein Expression in FFPE Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) pre-treatment biopsies were subjected to an HRP technique (DAKO Envision Flex, Hamburg, Germany) [50 (link)] with Caspase-8 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and pCDK9 (Sigma) antibodies at 1:150 and 1:50 dilutions, respectively. Next, dextran-polymer-conjugated horseradish peroxidase and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen were used for visualization and hematoxylin solution for counterstaining. Negative control slides in the absence of primary antibodies were included for each staining procedure. Two investigators (F.R., I.K.), blinded to patient clinical information, performed the evaluation to minimize inter-observer variability. Marker expressions were dichotomized as “high” [Weighted Score (WS) > 6] or “low” (≤ 6) based on a combination of the fraction of positive cells [1 (0–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%) and 4 (> 75%)] and the staining intensities [1 + (weak), 2 + (moderate) and 3 + (intense)] [16 (link)]. Image acquisition was performed using an AxioScanZ1 slide scanner and Zen software (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!