The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using optical microscope

1

Intracortical Microelectrode Array Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 16-channel single-shank intracortical microelectrode array (A1×16-3mm-50-177-Z16, iridium electrode sites, NeuroNexus Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to record neural action potentials of the motor cortex (M1). Alternatively, a non-functional silicone implant of the same dimension was used to assess neuroinflammation and microbial composition. In a Faraday cage setup, each MEA to be implanted underwent EIS testing with a Gamry Interface 1010E Potentiostat (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA) consisting of each electrode site as the working electrode, a platinum wire as a counter electrode, and an Ag|AgCl electrode stored in KCl reference electrode for measurements. EIS was performed in 1x PBS (pH = 7.4) over a range of 1 to 106 Hz (12 points per decade) with an AC voltage of 50 mV. The impedance magnitude at 1 kHz was used to confirm functionality with expected values between 150 – 550 kHz. Following EIS verification, MEAs were cleaned using 70% ethanol and DI water to remove any residual 1x PBS and optically imaged using a Keyence Optical Microscope (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan) at a magnification of 150x for visual inspection. Non-functional dummy implants were cleaned using the same protocol as functional implants. After cleaning, both implant types were sterilized using cold gas ethylene oxide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intracortical Microelectrode Array Verification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before implantation, the 16-channel (electrode), single-shank intracortical microelectrode array (A1x16-3 mm-100-177-Z16, iridium electrode sites, NeuroNexus Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) quality was verified via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) testing. In a Faraday cage, each MEA to be implanted underwent EIS testing with a Gamry Interface 1010E Potentiostat (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA) consisting of each electrode site as the working electrode, a platinum wire as a counter electrode, and an Ag|AgCl reference electrode for measurements. EIS was performed in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH = 7.4) over 1 to 106 Hz (12 points per decade) with an AC voltage of 50 mV rms. Device verification was determined by measuring the impedance value at 1 kHz. If a device was above 1 MΩ or below 100 kΩ, it was not used for implantation. Following EIS verification, MEAs were cleaned by dipping in 70% ethanol and DI water to remove any residual 1× PBS and optically imaged using a Keyence Optical Microscope (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan) at a magnification of 150× for visual inspection. MEAs were then sterilized under cold-gas ethylene oxide sterilization for surgical use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiac Histology Analysis of Mouse Hearts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After completion of the MRI at 12 weeks of age, the mice were sacrificed, and their hearts were removed and fixed in formalin. Fixed hearts were sliced in the direction of the short axis of the left ventricle. Heart specimens were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 μm; some sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and some sections were immunostained. The stained tissues were observed using an optical microscope (Keyence Corporation; Osaka, Japan). H&E staining was performed by immersing samples in a hematoxylin solution (5 min) and alcohol–eosin staining solution (3 min). H&E-stained tissues were dehydrated six times with 100% alcohol and then permeabilized using xylene. Immunostaining was performed using the enzyme–antibody method. Dystrophin rabbit polyclonal antibodies (12715-1-P; Proteintech Group, Inc., Rosemont, IL, USA) were used as the primary antibody; the samples were incubated for 1 h. After washing three times for 5 min each, the samples were incubated with the EnVision+ horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (K4003; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 30 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Failure Mode Analysis of Fiber Posts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the push-out test, an optical microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) was used to investigate the failure mode in each specimen at 200× magnification. The VHX-5000 software was used to calculate the percentage of each area to define the type of failure. The failures were categorized [35 (link)] into (i) adhesive failure between the dentin and cement and/or between the cement and fiber post; (ii) cohesive failure within the fiber post, dentin, or cement material; (iii) mixed failure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Gastrocnemius Muscles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gastrocnemius tissues were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded and cut into 5-μm sections using a microtome for histological analyses. The sections were stained by H&E and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. The images were examined using an optical microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan), and quantitative morphometric analysis was performed for each sample using Metamorph software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Using immunohistochemistry methods, the sections were labeled with polyclonal anti-antibody (anti-CD31; Abcam, ab28364) and were visualized by the LSAB kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark, K0690), which is an automated immunostaining system based on the Lepto-streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method. Again, using immunohistochemistry, the sections were labeled with antibodies (SMA, Dako, M0851; Ki-67, Abcam, ab16667; myogenin, Abcam, ab1835; MyoD, Abcam, ab16148; PAX7, Abcam, ab199010; IPR, Abcam, ab60706), visualized using the corresponding secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 555, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) that were counterstained by a Hoechst 33342 solution (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan, EJ-091), and assessed using a confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Micro-XRF Imaging and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microfocused synchrotron radiation-based
XRF experiments were performed at the microprobe end station of the
P06 Hard X-ray Micro/Nano-Probe beamline of the PETRA III storage
ring of the DESY facility (Hamburg, Germany),31 (link) using an excitation photon energy of 12 and 19.5 keV selected by
means of a Si(111) double-crystal monochromator. A Kirkpatrick–Baez
mirror optic was used to focus the beam to a spot size of about 0.8
× 0.8 μm2 (h × v). A Keyence optical microscope equipped with a perforated
mirror allowed for positioning of the sample. Fluorescent X-rays were
detected using the Maia detector array.32 (link) Two-dimensional images were obtained by raster scanning the samples
in 200–500 nm steps (horizontal and vertical) in the microfocused
beam, while registering a full XRF spectrum for every pixel with 3–50
ms acquisition time. Stitching of the recorded maps was performed
using inhouse developed software, Datamuncher.33 (link) XRF spectral fitting was performed using the PyMCA software
package.34 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Femoral Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The femoral muscle tissue was formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, and cut into 5-μm-thick sections using a microtome for histological analyses. Using immunohistochemistry, the sections were labeled with a polyclonal anti-antibody (anti-CD31, Abcam, ab28364; anti-αSMA, Dako, M0851) and visualized using the LSAB kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark, K0690), which is an automated immunostaining system based on the Lepto-streptavidin–biotin–peroxidase method. The sections were then stained with the corresponding secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 555 or Alexa Fluor 488, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). The number of CD31-positive cells was evaluated by averaging five visual fields of five sections using an optical microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The percentage of double-positive cells was calculated by averaging five visual fields of five sections based on fluorescence staining using a confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Osteogenic Differentiation of hBMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hBMSCs with different treatment were inoculated on 12-well plates with a density of 3 × 105 cells/well and differentiated in osteogenic differentiation medium Oricel (Cyagen, Suzhou, China) for 14 d. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and then stained with 1% alizarin red S staining solution (ScienCell, USA) for 10 min. Finally, after washing with PBS twice, stained cells were photographed with an optical microscope (Keyence, Shanghai, China). Alizarin red staining in a stained monolayer by acetic acid extraction and neutralization with ammonium hydroxide followed by colorimetric detection at 405 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histological Analysis of Ischemic Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were euthanized with CO2 at 28 days after cell infusion. The adductor muscle was dissected, then fixed with formalin and embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5-µm sections using a microtome for histological analysis. For assessment of capillary vessels, ischemic muscle sections were stained with sheep polyclonal anti-von Willebrand factor (vWF) antibody (AB7356, 1:50; Millipore). Furthermore, sections were stained with hematoxylin for assessment of muscle atrophy based on average fiber size, calculated as the ratio of muscle area to number of muscle fibers. For detection of infused MSCs in the ischemic limb, rats were euthanized at one day after GFP-MSC infusion, then frozen sections were stained with DAPI and phalloidin (A34055, 1:100; Invitrogen). Rats treated with the vehicle were examined as a control. Histological measurements were performed in five randomly selected fields of each tissue section. Obtained images were examined using an optical microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal X-ray Microscopy of Paint Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diffraction and fluorescence signals were collected from cross-sections at the microprobe hutch of the Hard X-ray Micro/Nano-Probe Beamline P06 of DESY (Hamburg, Germany). This beamline is dedicated to scanning X-ray microscopy with micro/nanoscopic spatial resolution [16 (link)]. A primary photon energy of 12.3 or 21 keV, which is selected by means of a Si (111) DCM, was employed for analyzing the paint cross-sections. The KB mirror system allowed us to focus the beam down to ca. 0.5 × 0.5 μm2 (h × v).
By means of a Vortex EM Si drift detector, on-the-fly scanning and acquisition of XRF data with millisecond dwell times per scan pixel was possible. A hybrid photon-counting imaging detector, the EIGER X 4M (Dectris Ltd., Baden, Switzerland), was positioned behind the sample for transmission XRPD measurements, allowing for the simultaneous acquisition of X-ray fluorescence (SR µ-XRF) and diffraction (SR µ-XRPD) data. Calibration of the diffraction setup was performed by means of LaB6 as a reference sample. Every sample was observed before and during the measurements by means of an optical microscope (Keyence, Itasca, IL, USA) equipped with a perforated mirror to allow the possibility to observe the sample under the same angle of the incident X-ray beam while keeping the entire setup still.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!