The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

75 protocols using epcam

1

Human Fetal Gonad Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human prenatal gonads or aggregates were dissociated with 0.25% trypsin (GIBCO, 25200–056) for 5 min or 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (GIBCO, 25300–054) for 10 min at 37°C. The dissociated cells were stained with conjugated antibodies, washed with FACS buffer (1% BSA in PBS) and resuspended in FACS buffer with 7-AAD (BD PharMingen, 559925) as viability dye. The single cell suspension was analyzed or sorted for further experiments. The conjugated antibodies used in this study include: ITGA6 conjugated with BV421 (BioLegend, 313624, 1:60), ITGA6 conjugated with 488 (BioLegend, 313608, 1:60), EPCAM conjugated with 488 (BioLegend, 324210, 1:60), EPCAM conjugated with APC (BioLegend, 324208, 1:60), tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) conjugated with PE (BD PharMingen, 561433, 1:60), and cKIT conjugated with APC (BD PharMingen, 550412, 1:60).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Sorting of Prostate Epithelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow sorting of mouse prostate epithelial cells, cell suspensions were stained on ice for 25 min with fluorescent-tagged EpCAM (BioLegend #118214) antibody. For isolation of human prostate epithelial cells, we used fluorescent-tagged EpCAM (BioLegend #324208, specific for human) and E-cadherin (eBioscience #46-3249-82) antibodies. The stained cells were spun, and cell pellets washed with HBSS/2% FBS, followed by resuspension in HBSS/2% FBS with 10 µM Y-27632 (ROCK inhibitor; STEMCELL Technologies) and a 1:1000 dilution of 0.5 mg/ml DAPI to exclude dead cells. Both side-scatter pulse width (SSC-W) vs. area (SSC-A) and forward side-scatter pulse area (FSC-A) vs. heights (FSC-H) were used to isolate single dissociated cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

FACS Sorting of Lung AEC2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For FACS sorting, lungs from WT or Sftpc-CreER; tdTomato+ mice were collected at 6 to 8 weeks of age and processed into a single-cell suspension using dispase, DNase I and collagenase I, as previously described [15 (link)]. The AEC2 population (Sftpc+ AEC2 cells) was isolated from the lungs of 6–8-week-old Sftpc-CreER; tdTomato+ mice 5 days after induction with 200 μg/g body weight tamoxifen. Krt5+ AEC2s and Krt5 AEC2s were sorted by MoFlo SX (Beckman Coulter, Miami FL). Data were analyzed in Summit 5.2 (Beckman). For FACS analysis and sorting of mouse, the following antibodies were used: CD45 (Biolegend, 103,116, 1:100), LysoTracker (Invitrogen, L7526, 1:14000), EpCAM (Biolegend, 118,206, 1:100), Krt5 (Abcam, ab193895, 1:300), and Edu (50 mg/kg, E10187, Life Technologies). For the FACS analysis and sorting of patients, the following antibodies were used: LysoTracker (Invitrogen, #L7526, 1:14000), CD45 (Biolegend, #368,530, 1:1000), KRT5 (ABcam, #ab193895, 1:1000); EpCAM (Biolegend, #324,220, 1:1000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Human Fetal Gonad Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human prenatal gonads or aggregates were dissociated with 0.25% trypsin (GIBCO, 25200–056) for 5 min or 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (GIBCO, 25300–054) for 10 min at 37°C. The dissociated cells were stained with conjugated antibodies, washed with FACS buffer (1% BSA in PBS) and resuspended in FACS buffer with 7-AAD (BD PharMingen, 559925) as viability dye. The single cell suspension was analyzed or sorted for further experiments. The conjugated antibodies used in this study include: ITGA6 conjugated with BV421 (BioLegend, 313624, 1:60), ITGA6 conjugated with 488 (BioLegend, 313608, 1:60), EPCAM conjugated with 488 (BioLegend, 324210, 1:60), EPCAM conjugated with APC (BioLegend, 324208, 1:60), tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) conjugated with PE (BD PharMingen, 561433, 1:60), and cKIT conjugated with APC (BD PharMingen, 550412, 1:60).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibody Panel for Cell Surface Marker Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-CD49f, c-Kit and EpCam antibodies were obtained from BioLegend (San Diego, CA); Anti-CD10, Muc1 and Thy1 antibodies were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA); and anti-keratin 14 and keratin 19 antibodies were purchased from Neomarkers/ThermoScientific (Fremont, CA). Detailed information on the clones and conjugates are provided in Supplementary Table 3. Muc1 antibody was custom labelled using the PacificBlue Antibody Labeling Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Polybrene/hexadimethrine bromide (H9268), α-L-Fucosidase from bovine kidney (F5884), β-(1→3,4,6)-Galactosidase (G1288), Hyaluronidase (H3506) and neuraminidase (type III) from Vibrio cholera (N7885) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extracellular Vesicle Protein Profiling for Biomarker Discovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs used in Western blotting analysis were purified from patient plasma using ExoQuick Ultra (System Biosciences, EQULTRA-20A-1), following the manufacturer’s instruction. Final elutes were dissolved in RIPA buffer (1/10 of elute volume). Signals were detected and quantitated with the LI-COR Odyssey system. To calculate marker ratios, intensities of protein bands of each marker were divided by signals of CD9 bands of the same patient. To rescale the marker ratios, the median value of each marker ratio in the whole patient cohort was set to be 100; then all other values were rescaled accordingly. Antibodies used were CD9, Cell Signaling Technology 13174; VGLUT2, Cell Signaling Technology 71555; GPC4, R&D Systems, Bio-Techne, MAB9195; MUC1, BD Biosciences 555925; EGFR, Cell Signaling Technology 4267; EPCAM, BioLegend 118201; CD44v6, Thermo Fisher Scientific BMS125; CD14, BioLegend 367101; annexin A11, Thermo Fisher Scientific MA5-25052; and sLeX, BD Biosciences 551344.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed by staining with Zombie Yellow viability dye, blocking with anti-CD16/32, and staining for 30 min at 4°C with the following anti-human antibodies: CD45 (BD:HI30), CD3 (BD:UCHT1), CD11b (Biolegend:M1-70), CD206 (Biolegend:15-2), CD163 (Biolegend:GHI/61), CD271 (Biolegend:ME20.4), PD-L1 (Biolegend:29E.2A3); or anti-mouse antibodies: CD45 (Biolegend:30-F-11), CD11b (Biolegend:M1-70), F4/80 (Biolegend:F4/80), Ly6G (Biolegend:1A8), Ly6C (Biolegend:HK1.4), IA/IE (BD:M5/114), CD206 (Biolegend:C068C2), PD-L1 (Biolegend:10F.9G2), PD-1 (BD:J43), IFN-γ (Biolegend:XMG1.2), CD3 (Tonbo:145-2C11), CD8 (Biolegend:YTS156.7.7), CD4 (BD:GK1.5), CD106 (Biolegend:429-MVCAM.A), EpCAM (Biolegend:G8.8), CD44 (Biolegend:IM7), Sca1 (Biolegend:D7). For IFN-γ, cells were pre-stimulated with PMA (20 ng/mL), Ionomycin (Sigma, 1 μg/mL) and Golgi stop (BD, 0.8 μL/106 cells) for 4 hr. Samples were subsequently run using BD FACS LSRII or sorted using BD FACS ARIA. Data were analyzed using FlowJo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation of Intestinal Epithelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol for isolation of IEC cells was based on the previously described method with minor modifications. In brief, the small and large intestines were harvested individually from treated mice and rinsed extensively with RPMI-1640 media (from Lonza) after Peyer’s patches were removed (for small intestine). The rinsed intestines were opened longitudinally and macerated; the tissue pieces were shaken gently in RPMI-1640 containing 2 mM EDTA and 10% fetal calf serum. The tissue preparations were passed through 70-µm mesh filters, and the resulting single-cell suspensions were applied to Percoll (from Sigma) density gradients of 25%, 40%, and 75%. After centrifugation at 2000×g for 20 min, the interface between the 25% and 40% layers was collected to obtain IECs. The cells were stained using antibodies for either epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM, from Biolegend) or CD45 (from Biolegend) and nucleic acid dye (Via-Probe, from BD Biosiences). The Via-Probe/CD45/EpCAM+ IEC were sorted using BD FACSMelodyTM Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences) for further biomedical analysis [55 (link), 56 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation of Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LN cells were stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD25, anti-CD44 (IM7; BD), and anti-MHC class II to isolate MHCIICD4+CD25CD44 naive CD4+ T cells. Splenocytes were stained with anti-CD11c and anti-MHC class II to isolate MHCII+CD11c+ DCs. Blood cells were stained with anti-MHC class II, anti-CCR3, and anti–Siglec-F, and bone marrow cells were stained with anti–MHC class II, anti-CD11b, and anti–Siglec-F to isolate MHCIICCR3highSiglec-Fhigh and MHCIICD11bintSiglec-Fhigh eosinophils, respectively. Small intestinal epithelial cell preparation was stained with anti-CD45 (30-F11; eBioscience) and anti-EpCAM (G8.8; BioLegend) to isolate CD45EpCAM+ intestinal epithelial cells. Small intestinal LP cells were stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD25, anti–MHC class II, and anti–Siglec-F; MHCIISiglec-F+ eosinophils and MHCIISiglec-FCD4+CD25 T cells were sorted on a MoFlo Astrios or MoFlo XDP (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Tumor Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor cell suspensions were stained with specific antibodies against EPCAM and CD45 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). Proportions of EPCAM+CD45- tumor cells in the final cell suspension were assessed by flow cytometry using BD FACS Aria and FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!