The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ventana benchmark stainer

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States, Germany

The Ventana BenchMark stainer is a laboratory instrument used for the automated staining of tissue samples. It is designed to perform immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) assays. The stainer automates the process of applying reagents, incubating, and washing the tissue samples to enable consistent and reproducible staining results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using ventana benchmark stainer

1

Tissue Microarray Construction and Immunohistochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed as previously described [22 (link), 23 (link)], using a semi-automated arraying device (TMArrayer, Pathology Devices, Westminister, MD, USA). A set of three 1 mm cores was obtained from viable, non-necrotic areas of the primary tumours. For immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of CD1a, CD68, CD163 and MARCO, 4 μm TMA-sections were pre- treated using ULTRA Cell Conditioning Solution 1, pH 8.5 (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) for heat induced epitope retrieval, and stained in a Ventana BenchMark stainer (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.) with the following antibodies: CD1a: clone NCL-CD1a-220, diluted 1:25, LEICA Biosystems, Newcastle, UK, CD68: clone KP1, diluted 1:1000, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark, CD163: clone 10D6 diluted 1:200 Novus Biologicals, Abingdon, United Kingdom, MARCO clone HPA063793, diluted 1:250, Atlas Antibodies, Bromma, Sweden. The antibody-antigen complex was visualized with ultraView Universal DAB Detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed as previously described [13 (link), 14 (link)], using a semi-automated arraying device (TMArrayer, Pathology Devices, Westminister, MD, USA). A set of three 1 mm cores was obtained from viable areas of the 175 primary tumours. For immunohistochemical IHC analysis of CD56, CD3, CD68 and CD1A, 4 μm TMA-sections were pre-treated using ULTRA Cell Conditioning Solution 1, pH 8.5 (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) for heat induced epitope retrieval, and stained in a Ventana BenchMark stainer (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.) with the following antibodies: CD56: Clone MRQ-42, pre-diluted, Ventana Medical Systems Inc., CD3: Clone 2GV6, pre-diluted, Ventana Medical Systems Inc., CD1a: clone NCL-CD1a-220, diluted 1:25, LEICA Biosystems, Newcastle, UK, CD68: clone KP1, diluted 1:1000, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark. The antibody-antigen complex was visualized with ultraView Universal DAB Detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed as previously described using a semiautomated arraying device (TMArrayer, Pathology Devices, Westminister, MD, USA) [26 (link)]. Duplicate tissue cores (1 mm) were obtained from two different blocks of the primary tumor.
For immunohistochemical analysis of FoxP3 and CD8, 4 μm TMA-sections were automatically pre-treated using the PT Link system and then stained in an Autostainer Plus (Dako; Glostrup, Denmark) with the anti-FoxP3 antibody (clone 236A/E7, mouse, dilution 1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and the anti-CD8 antibody (clone C8/144B, mouse; dilution, 1:50; product M7103; Dako). For immunohistochemical analysis of CD3, 4 μm TMA-sections were pretreated using ULTRA Cell Conditioning Solution 1, pH 8.5 (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.Tucson, AZ, USA) for heat induced epitope retrieval, and stained in a Ventana BenchMark stainer (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.) with the anti-CD3 antibody (clone 2GV6, pre-diluted, Ventana Medical Systems Inc).
Analysis of CD20 and IGKC was performed as previously described [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ER and PR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemical analysis, 4 μm TMA-sections were automatically pre-treated using ULTRA Cell Condition Solution 1, pH 8.5 (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) for heat induced epitope retrieval, and stained with the monoclonal antibodies CONFIRM anti-ER (SP1) and anti-PR (1E2) in a Ventana BenchMark stainer (Ventana Medical Systems). The antibody-antigen complex was visualized with UltraView Universal diaminobenzidine (DAB) Detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems).
Stained slides were digitalized at 20x magnification using the automated scanning system Hamamatsu, NanoZoomer, 13239-01, Hamamatsu Photonics, Sunayama-cho, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan). The immunohistochemical staining was manually annotated by three independent observers (GA, KJ and JEL) who were blinded to the clinical data and outcome of the patients, and with the two latter being board-certified pathologists, using the NDP.view2 viewer software version 3.2.12 (Hamamatsu Photonics). Expression of ER and PR was annotated as the number of tumor-associated stromal cells with nuclear staining. Conflicting annotations were jointly re-evaluated in order to reach consensus. The intensity of staining was not evaluated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD8, FoxP3, and CD3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of CD8 and FoxP3, 4 μm TMA‐sections were pretreated using the PT Link system, and subsequently stained with the anti‐CD8 antibody (clone C8/144B, mouse; dilution, 1:50; product M7103; Dako) and the anti‐FoxP3 antibody (clone236A/E7, mouse, dilution 1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) using the Autostainer Plus (Dako; Glostrup, Denmark).
For IHC analysis of CD3, 4 μm TMA‐sections were pretreated using ULTRA Cell Conditioning Solution 1, pH 8.5 (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ) for heat induced epitope retrieval, and stained in a Ventana BenchMark stainer (Ventana Medical Systems) with the anti‐CD3 antibody (clone 2GV6, prediluted, Ventana Medical Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Staining of CD57 in Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemical stains were performed with the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method [11 (link)]. In the TMAs “incidental PCa,” ”prostatectomy 1,” “prostatectomy 2,” and “lymph nodes,” it worked on an automated stainer (Autostainer Link 48, DAKO, Denmark), using an anti-CD57 antibody (clone NK-1, Menarini, Berlin, Germany) at a dilution of 1 : 10 after a pretreatment with proteinase K for 10 min. For the TMA “prostatectomy 2,” immunohistochemical stains against prostate-specific antigen were already available from previous studies [12 (link)]. The TMA “prostatectomy 3” was stained on Ventana Benchmark stainer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with another CD57 antibody (clone TB01, DAKO) at a dilution of 1 : 50.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of KRAS and PIK3CA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The KRAS antibody (clone 9.13, Thermo Fisher, dilution 1:100) and PIK3CA antibody (clone 6D9, Thermo Fisher, dilution 1:1000) stainings were performed on TMA slides using the Ventana Benchmark stainer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) according to the protocol of the manufacturers. Expression of KRAS and PIK3CA in the cytoplasm of carcinoma cells were assessed according to the following criteria: negative or weak staining in <5% of tumor cells (score 0); weak staining ≥5–20% of tumor cells (score 1); moderate to strong staining in ≥20% (score 2; compare Figure 3). The evaluation of immunohistochemical expression was assessed manually by two pathologists (A.Q. and A.E.). Discrepant results, which occurred in a small number of samples, were resolved by consensus review. Additional immunohistochemical markers were evaluated in this cohort of EAC, parts of it (VISTA, CD3) published [39 ], others (PD-L1, LAG3, TIM3, IDO) are currently under review. In brief, monoclonal antibodies were used (Ventana: PD-L1; Cell Signaling Technology: LAG3, TIM3, IDO) on the Ventana Benchmark stainer (PD-L1) or the Leica BOND-MAX stainer (Leica Biosystems, Germany) (LAG3, TIM3, and IDO). The expression in <1% lymphocytes were defined as negative and ≥1% was assessed as positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of DOT1L

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on TMA slides using the primary rabbit polyclonal antibody specific for DOT1L (#NB100-40845; dilution, 1:50; Novus Biologicals, Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the Ventana BenchMark stainer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol with on-slide controls of the appendix. As a secondary antibody the ready-to-use Ventana Detection kit (cat. no. 760–700; OptiView DAB IHC Detection kit; Ventana, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) for indirect biotin-free detection of primary rabbit antibody was used. DOTL1 exhibits a nuclear staining pattern. DOT1L staining was evaluated manually using light microscopy by two pathologists and discrepant results were resolved by consensus review.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Staining of Renal Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical stainings with antibodies specific for IgA, IgG, IgM, C1q, C3c (all polyclonal: Cat. No. IgA A0262, IgG A0423, RRID:AB_2335700; IgM A04202, RRID:AB_578520; C1q A013602, RRID:AB_578496; C3c A006202, RRID:AB_578477, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were performed on formalin fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE, 1μm sections) material with current standard methods after digestion with protease from Streptomyces griseus (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany, P5147) on a Ventana Benchmark stainer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) or manually before 2011. Limited staining in the glomerular vascular pole was scored as negative. The intensity of staining was categorized into 4 grades: grade 0 (none), grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (strong).
In case of IgA reactivity in the time zero biopsy additional stainings for C4d (polyclonal, rabbit anti-C4d, 1:500, Cat. No. RBK061, RRID:AB_2864450, Zytomed Systems GmbH, Bargteheide, Germany; antigen-retrieval with ULTRA CC1 buffer, Roche) and galactose-deficient IgA (rat anti-Gd-IgA1, clone KM55, 1:100, Cat. No. 10777, Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Minneapolis, MA, USA; antigen-retrieval with protease digestion) were performed manually.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Post-Mortem Examination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A post-mortem examination was performed on patient KEN-334-6, who signed an informed consent form, for the French National Brain Bank Network Donation Program NeuroCEB.
The postmortem delay was 11 h. The right half of the brain, including the hemisphere, brainstem, and cerebellum, was fixed by immersion in 4% formaldehyde (10% formalin). The contralateral hemisphere was frozen at -80°C. Formalin-fixed brain samples from selected regions, including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, basal ganglia, cerebellum, brainstem, spinal cord, and anterior and posterior roots of the spinal nerves, were embedded in paraffin and cut at a thickness of 3 μm. The spinal cord was sampled at the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels. The sections were deparaffinized in graded alcohol solutions and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and HE combined with Luxol fast blue for myelin. Selected sections were immunostained using a Ventana BenchMark stainer (Roche TM , Tucson, AZ, USA). The biotinylated secondary antibody was included in the detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems Basic DAB Detection Kit 250-001). Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as a chromogen. The pretreatment and antibodies used for immunohistochemistry are listed in Supplemental Table S2. Genomic DNA was isolated from cerebellum, according to standard procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!