The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

196 protocols using clarus 500

1

GC-MS Analysis of Antibacterial Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibacterial compounds in the bioactive chloroform extract were identified by gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC–MS). This was done by injecting 1 µL of sample into an RT x −5 column (30 × 0.32 nm) of the GC–MS model (Perkin Elmer, Clarus 500, Waltham, MA, USA). The carrier gas used was helium (3 mL/min). Identification of the chemical components of the extract was conducted using Perkin Elmer (Clarus 500, Waltham, MA, USA) gas chromatography coupled with (Clarus 500, Waltham, MA, USA) mass spectrometer (MS) [45 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Analysis of Headspace Volatiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the headspace from the solution, the analysis was carried out on a Clarus 500 model Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) gas chromatograph coupled with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer (Clarus 500 model Perkin Elmer) equipped with a FID (flame detector ionization). The chosen capillary column was a Varian Factor Four VF-1. The GC oven’s programmed temperature was set initially at 60 °C and then increased to 220 °C at 6°/min and finally held for 15 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant rate of 1 mL/min. MS detection was performed with electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV operating in the full-scan acquisition mode in the m/z range 40–500 amu. The identification of compounds was performed by the comparison of the MS-fragmentation pattern of the analytes with those of pure components stored in the Wiley 2.2 and Nist 02 mass spectra libraries database. Further, the Linear Retention Indices (LRIs) were calculated using a series of alkane standards (C8–C25n-alkanes-Agilent). The obtained LRIs were compared with available retention data reported in the literature. The relative amounts of the components were expressed as a percent peak area relative to total peak area without the use of an internal standard and any factor correction. The analysis was carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GC-qMS Analysis of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The target compounds in plant extracts, after dispersive-SPE procedure, were identified and quantified using a Gas Chromatograph (Perkin Elmer Clarus500) interfaced with a quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Clarus500). The GC-qMS facility at the Environmental Geochemistry Lab (EGL), CSIR-National Geophysical Research Laboratory (NGRI), Hyderabad, India was utilized in the present study. The GC-qMS system having a capillary column DB-5MS fused silica column (30.0 m × 0.25 mm, i.d. 0.25 μm film thicknesses) was used for separation of target OCPs. The oven temperature was programmed from 80˚C (initial time, 2 min) to 205˚C at a rate of 30˚C/min (hold time 5 min) and then heated to 290˚C at a rate of 10˚C/min with a final holding time of 3 min. The GC system was run in splitless mode, and an auto sampler was used to inject 1 μL aliquots of extracts. The carrier gas was helium with a steady flow rate of 1.0 mL / min. The energy used to ionize electrons was 70 eV. Chromatographic data were obtained in full scan mode and analyzed using the program TurboMass software (Version 6.1.0, Clarus500gcmssoftware.pdf">https://www.perkinelmer.com/Content/relatedmaterials/productnotes/prd_Clarus500gcmssoftware.pdf). Quantification for individual OCPs was performed using the external calibration and a five-point calibration curve constructed at a range of 5-100 ng/L38 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were carried out with a Clarus 500 Perkin Elmer apparatus equipped with two flame ionization detectors (FID), and two fused-silica capillary columns (50 m, 0.22 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm), BP-1 (polydimethylsiloxane), and BP-20 (polyethylene glycol). The oven temperature was programmed from 60 °C to 220 °C at 2 °C/min and then held isothermal at 220 °C for 20 min. The injector temperature was 250 °C. The detector temperature was 250 °C. The carrier gas was hydrogen (1.0 mL/min). The split was 1/60 and the injected volume was 0.5 μL. The relative contents of the oil constituents were expressed as a percentage obtained by peak-area normalization without using correction factors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Headspace Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The headspace analysis by SPME of samples were carried out using a Clarus 500 model Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometer and equipped with a FID (flame ionization detector) [19 (link),29 (link)]. The capillary column used for the separation of compounds, was a Varian Factor Four VF-1. The operative chromatographic and spectrometric conditions were as follows: the oven GC temperature program was: isothermal at 60 °C for 5 min, then ramped to 220 °C at a rate of 6 °C min−1, and finally isothermal at 220 °C for 20 min. The carrier gas was He at flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 in constant mode. The mass spectra were obtained in the electron impact mode (EI), at 70 eV, in scan mode in the range 35–450 m/z. For the identification of compounds, the matching between their mass spectra with those stored in the Nist 02 mass spectra library database, was performed. Further, the linear retention indices (LRIs), were calculated using a series of alkane standards (C8–C25n-alkanes) and compared with those available in the literature. Relative amounts of compounds, expressed as percentage, were calculated in relation to the total area of the chromatogram by normalizing the peak area without the use of an internal standard and any factor correction. All analyses were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Sunflower Oil Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sunflower oil was characterized by chemical analysis of its oxidative stability, such as the acidity index (mg KOH/g) Iodine (g/100 g oil) and peroxide (mequiv. O2/kg) according to standard methods [30] . These analyses provide information about the identity and quality of the oil after processing and marketing. The fatty acid profile was determined as previously described [30] , [31] (link), [32] , [33] employing a Perkin Elmer Clarus 500 gas chromatograph (Norwalk, CT) with an automatic injector and flame ionization detector. Conditions: A 50 m × 0.25 mm WCOT fused silica column (CAPILLARY CP-Sil 88, CP6173, Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), with the injector at 270 °C and a flame ionization detector at 310 °C. Initial oven temperature was 140 °C for 2 min and was increased in 2 °C increments for 60 s to 235 °C, held at 235 °C for 10 min, and finally raised to 270 °C. Hydrogen was used as the carrier gas at a flow of 30 ml per min. Individual fatty acids were identified by comparing their retention times with those of purified standards (fatty acid esters). The peak area was calculated using the chromatographic integrator and chromatography software and expressed as a relative percentage of each fatty acid in relation to the total fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hydrogen and Oxygen Production from Cyanobacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrogen and oxygen production potential of A. cylindrica cells was determined as described previously (Leino et al. 2014 (link)). Cell samples cultivated either in ambient air, or in the 100 % CO2 atmosphere in 100 mbar pressure for 7 days were harvested by pelleting, washed twice with BG-110 (BG-medium without combined nitrogen), and adjusted to 5 mg chlorophyll a per ml concentration in BG-110 medium. Five milliliter samples of these cell suspensions were taken into air tight 20 ml glass vials. The vials were thoroughly flushed with argon to create anaerobic condition in the head space of the vials. The vials were tightly sealed with rubber septa, supplemented with 10 % CO2 when needed, and incubated overnight with constant shaking and illumination (150 μmol photons m−2 s−1) at 25 °C. The following day, 150 μl of air from the head space in each vial was drawn with a gas-tight syringe (Hamilton Co.) and plunged into a gas chromatograph (Perkin Elmer Clarus 500, a Molecular Sieve 5 A, 60/80 Mesh column) to detect and quantify the gases produced, as described earlier (Leino et al. 2012 (link), 2014 (link); Raksajit et al. 2012 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Enzymatic Saccharification and Ethanol Yield

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The enzyme assays were carried out using standard International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry methods (Ghose 1987) . Total reducing sugars were estimated by the DNS method (Miller 1959) . Ethanol was estimated by gas chromatography Clarus 500; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) with an elite-wax (cross bond-polyethylene glycol) column (30.0 m×0.25 mm) at an oven temperature of 90 °C, an injector temperature of 150 °C and flame ionization detection at 200 °C. The ethanol standards were prepared using commercial grade ethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Nitrogen at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min -1 was used as the carrier gas. The saccharification yield was calculated as:
While the ethanol yield was calculated as:
All of the experiments were done in triplicate, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Soil and Root N2O Production Rates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data on potential N2O production rates (Graf et al. 2016 ) were incorporated as an indication of availability of N2O. Briefly, rates were determined using 10 g of soil and 1.5 g of root samples placed in 147 and 32 ml flasks, respectively. The soil samples were incubated as a slurry with 20 ml distilled water and a final concentration of 3 mM KNO3, 1.5 mM succinate, 1 mM glucose, and 3 mM acetate at 25°C under anoxic conditions (nitrogen gas in the headspace) during 3.5 h. The roots were incubated with 6 ml water during 7 h, but otherwise under the same conditions. Gas samples from the headspace were taken every 30 min and N2O concentrations were determined using a gas chromatograph (Clarus-500, Elite-Q PLOT phase capillary column, Perkin-Elmer). Only end-point concentrations of N2O were above detection level for the root samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pyrolysis GC/MS Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample for pyrolysis GC/MS (Table 1) was pyrolyzed in the presence of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) at 610°C for 15 seconds using a CDS pyroprobe 1000. The pyroprobe was interfaced to a Perkin Elmer Clarus 500 gas chromatograph with a 30 m Rxi-5Sil MS column (0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm film thickness), coupled to a Clarus 500 mass spectrometer. The injector temperature was 280 °C and the transfer line temperature was 310 °C.
The GC program had an initial temperature of 40 °C for 5 minutes that ramped up to 310 °C at a rate of 4 °C/minute, where it was held for 10 minutes. The resulting chromatographs were imported into AMDIS for spectral deconvolution, and major peaks were identified and confirmed using NIST-MS and retention indices.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!