The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Feg sem

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The FEG-SEM is a field emission gun scanning electron microscope that uses a field emission source to generate a high-energy electron beam. This electron beam is focused and scanned across the surface of a sample, producing high-resolution images that reveal the sample's topography and composition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using feg sem

1

Morphological Analysis of PLLA Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of PLLAsc, APLLAsc, E7-PLLAsc and E7-APLLAsc was observed by ultra-high resolution field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Secondary electron images were acquired with an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. Before analysis, the samples were gold-sputtered. For SEM observations of non-loaded single crystals, a drop of lamellae suspension in isopropanol was deposited on an aluminum stub and the liquid was removed through evaporation. For the E7-loaded samples, an aliquot of E7-PLLAsc or E7-APLLAsc suspension in phosphate-buffered saline containing the same sample amount used for subcutaneous mouse inoculation was deposited on an aluminum stub, dried, and used to analyze the morphology of the aggregated sample.
Semiquantitative analysis of the surface of aggregated structures of E7-PLLAsc or E7-APLLAsc was carried out by counting surface projections (crests) from at least 50 random fields of view for both samples at a magnification of 1,200×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEM Analysis of Bacterial Biofilm Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize the effect of the selected SEO NEs on the morphology of bacterial strains and the inhibition of biofilm formation, SEM was performed. The NEs were added to selected different biofilm producers at 1 and ½ of relative MIC concentrations. A 1 mL sample from each tube was seeded onto glass slides in 24-wells culture plates and incubated for 48 h. Samples were then washed twice with PBS (pH 7.4) and suspended in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (v/v) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). After overnight fixation at +4 °C and washing with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, samples were post-fixed with 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), dehydrated in ethanol–water mixture with increasing ethanol concentrations (35%, 50%, 70%, 85%, 95%, and 100%), and dried with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) to remove fluids. Dehydrated specimens were gold-sputtered and observed by ultra-high resolution field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Secondary electron images were performed with an acceleration voltage of 20 KV. The images were processed for display using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Nano-TiO2 and Immobilized Dextranase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nano-TiO2 and immobilized dextranase were ground into a powder using an agate mortar. The powder was compressed into thin discs for Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in transmission mode in the mid-infrared range of 400–4000 cm−1. Crystallinity analysis of TiO2 nanoparticles was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) in the diffraction range of 10° to 90° (2θ). The immobilized enzymes were washed with water three times, resuspended in 1 mL of water, and lyophilized at −80 °C. The nano-TiO2 was then analyzed using field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA), and the particle morphology of the nano-TiO2 immobilized dextranase was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Micro-Texture Analysis of Extruded Rods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-texture of the extruded rods was obtained using the electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) technique in a Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscope (FEG-SEM) by FEI Company. The samples were cloth polished with diamond paste (0.05 microns) to obtain a mirror finish, with kerosene acting as a lubricant. Further, mechanical electro-polishing was carried out (using an electrolyte containing 3:5 solution of H3PO4 in ethanol and pure aluminum cathode at 3 V for 30 s and 1.5 V for 3 min at ~0 °C) in the final polishing step. The EBSD scans were recorded on the radial plane of the samples parallel to the extrusion direction (ED). Kernel average misorientation (KAM) of each EBSD spot with all of its neighbouring spots was calculated with the provision that misorientations exceeding 5° were excluded from the average calculation. The misorientation between a grain at the centre of the kernel and all points at the perimeter of the kernel were measured. The local misorientation value assigned to the centre point was the average of these misorientations, which could be obtained from the EBSD scans. Maps, constructed using this method, are helpful in visualizing the distribution of local misorientation within a grain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Listeria Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for scanning electron microscopy were prepared as follows: 24-well plates containing glass slides were inoculated with both Listeria strains in TSB-YE medium containing or not containing TiO2 nanoparticles at different concentrations. After 48 hrs incubation, samples were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% in 0.1 M cacodilate buffer (pH 7.4), and post-fixed in 1% OsO4 solution. After dehydratation in ethanol–water misture with increasing ethanol concentrations (65%, 75%, 85%, 95%, and 100%), biofilms were treated with hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma–Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and overnight air-dried. Dehydrated specimens were coated with a thin film of Au in a sputter coater. Morphological analysis was performed in an Ultra-high resolution Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscopy (FEG-SEM, FEI Company). Secondary electron images were performed with an acceleration voltage of 10 KV. The images were processed for display using photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Bacterial Morphology via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess the morphological effects of peptides on the E. coli and S. aureus strains. Both untreated and treated bacteria were fixed overnight at 4 °C with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH of 7.4) and post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide. After washing with cacodylate buffer, the samples were seeded onto glass slides coated with ε-poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Adsorbed bacteria were dehydrated using an alcohol gradient (35 to 100%) followed by treatment with hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma–Aldrich, MO, USA) and air drying. The dried specimens were mounted on stubs containing adhesives and sputter-coated with gold. Morphological analysis was performed using an ultra-high-resolution Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscope (FEG-SEM, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Secondary electron images were taken with an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. The images were processed for display using Photoshop CS4 (version 11.0) software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!