The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

446 protocols using rstudio version 1

1

Predictors of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Deterioration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were mostly non‐normally distributed (as determined by Shapiro–Wilk test) and are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Paired data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and unpaired data using the Mann–Whitney U‐test. Categorical data were analysed using the chi‐squared or McNemar test, when comparing paired repeated measurements. Logistic regression [odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs] was performed to identify independent predictors of deterioration in continuous glucose monitoring variables. No sample size calculation was performed. P values < 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance and no adjustment was made for multiplicity of statistical tests. All analyses were performed using rstudio version 1.0.153 (https://www.rstudio.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Blood Type and Cardiometabolic Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Numerical variables were expressed as means with standard deviations (SD). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (n) with percentages (%). Covariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses were applied to assess cross-sectional relationships between Lewis- and AB0-blood type and PD, hypertension, IHD, stroke, and obesity. Analysis results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%). Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Reference categories were chosen by biological relevance as well as population incidence. All analyses were performed in RStudio Version 1.0.153 (RStudio Inc., Boston, MA, USA) using R version 3.4.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Meta-Analysis of Velopharyngeal Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each study, incidence was reported for each of the following outcomes: no hypernasality, no consistent hypernasality, less than mild hypernasality, no consistent nasal air emission, nasometric scores within normal range, additional velopharyngeal surgery for persistent VPI, and diagnosis of OSA. Incidence of no consistent hypernasality was pre-specified as the primary outcome of interest. Forest plots were constructed using 95% Wald confidence intervals. The I2 test was performed to evaluate heterogeneity across studies. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model to address variability across studies. Subgroup analyses were pre-specified and included comparison by indication for selecting re-repair, technique of re-repair, and inclusion or exclusion of subjects with syndromic diagnoses. Comparison among subgroups was performed with ANOVA using a random effects model. Statistical analyses were performed in R Studio Version 1.0.153 (RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis of DLBCL Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparison between continuous, non-normally distributed variables was estimated by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differences between two nominal variables were evaluated using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test (for expected groups sizes ≤ 5). For exploratory survival analysis, the primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). OS was defined as the time from diagnosis until death (from any cause). PFS was defined as the time from diagnosis until death or relapse or progression [12 (link)]. DSS was defined as the time from diagnosis until death from DLBCL. Surviving patients were censored at the last date of follow-up. Survival curves were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for univariate and multivariate survival analyses and results were reported as hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p value based on statistical Wald test. A two-tailed p value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. All analyses were performed using R version 3.4.1 and R-studio version 1.0.153 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Immune Cell Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EPX activity, EDN release, and in vitro chemotaxis data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way ANOVA test, based on normality of the data. Following this the Tukey test was used for pair-wise comparisons (Sigmaplot 13.0, Systat Software). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
For flow cytometry studies, MFI values were obtained from flow cytometry analysis software (FlowJo 10.2). MFI fold change values were normalized by performing log transformation of the ratio between cytokine stimulated MFI values and unstimulated MFI values. Ratio-t-tests were performed on the log-transformed data (RStudio Version 1.0.153). Differences were considered significant according to the stated Bonferroni corrected p-value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pathogenic Strains in Bat Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We evaluated the difference in the number of strains belonging to pathogenic species isolated from different sampling sites and different bat species using Fisher’s exact test, using a significance level of α = 0.05. The data were analysed using RStudio Version 1.0.153 for macOS (https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio, accessed on 21 September 2022). The built-in function fisher.test was used to calculate the p-values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

R261H NEK1 Variant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of the R261H NEK1 variant in patients and healthy individuals was carried out according to the guidelines of case–control allelic association study design (Lewis, 2002 (link)). All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio version 1.0.153 (RStudio Team, 2015). Frequencies were compared using X2 statistics (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Bacterial Dynamics and Antibiotic Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparisons of the relative abundances of the seven dominant bacterial genera and the abundance of the dominant ARG drug classes were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis with inference based on permutation tests and multiple-comparison [46 ] correction via the Holm method [47 ]. To identify specific bacterial species that had a relative abundance significantly associated with antibiotic use at each time sampled, we used multivariate association with the linear mixed-effect model (MaAsLin2) controlled for multiple comparison via FDR [48 (link)]; Fixed effects: antibiotic treatment, age, race, and sex; random effects: subject [49 (link)]. Permutation-based inference was used to improve inference validity. To test for differences among the subject demographics by treatment group we used an ANOVA and Fisher exact test of independence for numerical and categorical data, respectively. All tests were run in RStudio Version 1.0.153.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Prehospital Stroke Scale Sensitivity for LVO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prehospital stroke scales were reconstructed with the NIHSS items assessed at baseline in the intervention centre. The scales were assessed as positive or negative, using the cut point proposed in the original publication. We calculated the sensitivity for the detection of LVO for each prehospital stroke scale, both stratified by occlusion location and for all occlusion locations combined. For each prehospital stroke scale, the sensitivities for different occlusion locations were compared using Chi-square tests. Additionally, we plotted the sensitivity for all possible cut points of the prehospital stroke scales, stratified by occlusion location. Potential differences in sensitivity across prehospital stroke scales may be caused by variation in the included NIHSS items. Therefore, we calculated the percentage of patients in our cohort who had an abnormal score on each NIHSS item. All analyses were performed using R software version 3.6.1 and Rstudio version 1.0.153.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 (SPSS, Inc.) and RStudio version 1.0.153 (RStudio, Inc.) software for all statistical analyses and data processing. We considered P < 0.05 (two-tailed) as statistically significant. We used the χ2 test and the Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, to investigate the relationships between categorical parameters. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!