The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chip cube interface

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Chip Cube interface is a modular, compact, and flexible device used for interfacing with a variety of microfluidic chips or lab-on-a-chip devices. It provides a standardized and integrated platform for controlling and monitoring chip-based experiments. The Chip Cube interface facilitates the connection between the microfluidic chip and external instrumentation, enabling the control of fluid flow, temperature regulation, and data acquisition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using chip cube interface

1

SILAC-PP Protocol for Quantitative Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SILAC-PP samples were analyzed on a Agilent 6520 Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with a Chip Cube interface (Agilent Technologies, Inc). Solvent A consisted of H2O with 0.1 % formic acid and Solvent B consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1 % formic acid. The solvent gradient increased linearly from 3 to 5 % B over 2 min, 5 to 15 % B over 2 min, 15 to 60 % B over 18 min, 60 to 90 % B over 3 min, 90 to 100% B over 0.1 min, 100 to 5 % B over 1.9 min, and then isocratic at 5% B for 3 min. The flow rate was 0.4 μL/min and the inclusion window for precursor ions was 4 m/z. An HPLC chip with a 40 nL trapping column and 75 μm × 43 mm column with 300 Å Zorbax C18 packing (5 μM) was employed. The collision induced dissociation energy was achieved using the equation 3.50 V/100 m/z with an off-set of −4.80 V. The drying gas was set to 6 L/min at 350 °C, the capillary voltage ranged from 1800–1850, the skimmer was set to 65 V, and the fragmentor was set to 175 V. Four precursor ions were selected for fragmentation in each cycle. The mass spectrometry data from the SILAC-PP experiment have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomcentral.proteomeexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository30 (link) with the dataset identifier to be released at the time of publication.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Extraction and Analysis in Gastrointestinal Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Low molecular weight peptides in samples withdrawn at the end of the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion were extracted by ultrafiltration with Amicon Ultra-4 nominal cut-off 3 kDa as previously described [28 (link)]. Nano LC/MS and tandem MS experiments were carried out on a 1200 Series Liquid Chromatographic two-dimensional system coupled with a 6520 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS via a Chip Cube Interface (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was performed on a ProtID-Chip-43 (II) including a 4 mm 40 nL enrichment column and a 43 mm × 75 μm analytical column, both packed with a Zorbax 300SB 5 μm C18 phase (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The full description of the method is reported in Tagliazucchi et al. [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Peptide analysis by nano LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptide samples prepared with the FASP method were analysed using a 1200 Series nano LC connected to a 6410 QQQ mass spectrometer via a chipcube interface (Agilent Technologies, UK). Peptide samples (1 µg in 0.1% formic acid) were injected for LC-MS/MS analysis with a 10 minute gradient from 3% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid to 100% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid using a Large Capacity Chip (160 nl) 150 mm C-18 (Agilent Technologies, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nano-LC-MS/MS Analysis of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were reconstituted with 0.1% formic acid in 3% acetonitrile prior to analysis. The analysis was performed with an Agilent 6520 Accurate-Mass Quadrupole Time-of-Flight (Q-TOF) LC/MS instrument equipped with a Chip Cube interface (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The mobile phase solvents were 0.1% formic acid in 3% acetonitrile (A) and 0.1% formic acid in 90% acetonitrile (B). Peptides were separated on a nano-LC chip containing a 40 nL enrichment column and a 75 μm x 150 mm analytical column packed with ZORBAX 300SB-C18 30Å material. The gradient employed for a 65-min run was 0 to 2.3% B from 0 to 0.1 min, 2.3 to 8% B from 0.1 to 2 min, 8 to 37% B from 2 to 40 min, 37 to 48% B from 40 to 45 min, 48 to 100% B from 45 to 45.1 min, followed by 100% B for 5 min and 0% B for 15 min. The flow rate was 0.3 μL/min. Mass spectra were collected in positive mode with scan ranges of 275 to 2000 m/z (MS) and 100 to 2000 (MS/MS). Fragmentation was performed using collision-induced dissociation. Collision energy was set by formula: (0.031 * m/z + 1) V for precursors with charge states = 2, and (0.036 * m/z − 4.8) V for precursors with charge states >= 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cashew Allergen Identification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equivalent amounts of soluble Cashewgurt protein and cashew nut extract were trypsinized and analyzed by LC–MS/MS to characterize allergen content. To ensure complete characterization, the results of at least 13 independent sample runs for each of the cashew nut and Cashewgurt protein extracts were merged to show the overall percent of the allergens that were identified (percent coverage). Samples treated with trypsin as previously described [13 (link)] were run on an Agilent 6520 Q-TOF LC/MS using a Chip Cube interface with a Large Capacity Chip (II) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and analyzed using Mascot software (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA) to determine protein identification and percent of protein coverage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted Urinary Proteomics Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously published by our group and others7 (link)9 (link)49 (link), we used SRM-LC-MS/MS to validate differential proteins identified in the discovery phase. Urine samples from different individuals’ cohorts were used. In particular, 16 patients and 7 healthy subjects were recruited. Urine samples were concentrated and desalted. Total protein content was quantified by Bradford assay and protein samples were reduced, alkylated and digested with sequencing grade trypsin (Roche). Tryptic peptides solutions were cleaned with C18 spin columns (Protea Biosciences) according to manufacturer’s instructions and mixed 1:1 with mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in MilliQ water). A 6460 Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer was used on-line connected to nano-chromatography in a Chip-format configuration (ChipCube interface, ProtID Zorbax 300B-C18-5 μm chip, 43 × 0.075-mm analytical column and 40 nL enrichment column, Agilent Technologies). The system was controlled by Mass Hunter Software (v4.0 Agilent Technologies). Theoretical SRM transitions were designed using Skyline (v.1.1.0.2905) and peptide specificity was confirmed by protein blast. Only those proteotypic (specific) peptides were selected50 (link). In this case, one specific proteotypic peptide was measured per protein, by monitoring two transitions for RBP4 and three transitions for KNG1 (see Supplementary material).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by SILAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Semi-automated in-gel tryptic digestion was performed on a liquid handler as previously described [53 ]. Peptides were analyzed using a 1200 Series nano high performance liquid chromatography coupled with Quadrupole-Time of Flight 6520 with a Chip-Cube interface (Agilent Technologies) as described [53 ]. Spectrum Mill (Agilent, B.04.00.127) was used for data analysis. Data were extracted with carbamidomethylated cysteine as a fixed modification and SILAC amino acids N-Lys, 13C615N2-Lys, N-Arg and 13C615N4-Arg as a mix modification. Extracted data were searched against the SwissProt (release-2011_01) human database with the same modifications as above, and oxidized methionine as a variable modification. Precursor and product mass tolerance was set to ± 20 ppm and ± 50 ppm respectively. Reverse database scores were calculated with Spectrum Mill search engine by using the percentage of false positive identifications using the following cut-off: protein score > 11, peptide score >10 and scored peak intensity > 60%. All peptides identified had a global false discovery rate of less than 0.9%. Mean SILAC ratio (H/L) and standard deviations were calculated using all the peptide ratios matched to a protein, and p-values were calculated using peptide SILAC ratios as previously described [25 -27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!