The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Imagequant tl

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan

The ImageQuant TL is a densitometry software designed for the analysis of 1D and 2D electrophoresis gels, Western blots, and other types of imaging data. It provides quantitative analysis of band and spot intensities, allowing users to measure and compare protein or nucleic acid levels across multiple samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

68 protocols using imagequant tl

1

Analyzing Glycosphingolipid Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Supernatants from confluent monolayer cultures of MCF-7 cells (Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Hsinchu, Taiwan) were collected on day 5, centrifuged at 1200×g for 10 min, and passed through 0.22 μm filter. The culture medium was concentrated (Eppendorf) before loading into membrane. The PVDF membrane was activated in MeOH and washed in PBS and blocked for 30 min with 3% BSA in PBS. Membrane was incubated with anti-GHCer mAb VK9. After incubation with alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-mouse IgG, immune-reactive GSL dots were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Amersham, UK) and analyzed by Typhoon (Cytiva). The optical density of dots detected by dot-blotting was calculated with ImageQuantTL (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intracellular dNTP Quantification by HIV-1 RT Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular dNTP levels were measured by our HIV-1 RT-based dNTP assay as previously described (3 (link)). Dried dNTP extracts were resuspended in 20 μl of water and further diluted until the samples were within the linear range of the assay. 5′ 32P-end-labeled 18-mer DNA primer (5′-GTCCCTCTTCGGGCGCCA-3′; Integrated DNA Technologies) was annealed to four different 19-mer DNA templates (3′-CAGGGAGAAGCCCGCGGTX-5′; Integrated DNA Technologies), where X represents one of the four nucleotides. Two microliters of diluted extract was incubated with 200 fmol template/primer, 4 μl of purified RT (HIV-1 HXB2), 25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 2 mM DTT, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 10 μM oligo (dT) in a 20 μl reaction at 37 °C for 5 min. Water or 0.5 mM dNTP mix replaced the diluted dNTP extract for a negative and positive control, respectively. Reactions were stopped by adding 10 μl of 40 mM EDTA and 99% (v/v) formamide and incubated at 95 °C for 2 min. Reactions were resolved on a 14% urea-PAGE gel (AmericanBio, Inc) and imaged using an Amersham Typhoon (Cytiva). ImageQuant TL (Cytiva) was used to quantify single-nucleotide extensions products which is used to determine the amount of dNTP present in the extract.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Formulation of cVLP:IL1β Vaccines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cVLPs and muIL-1β antigens were purified for lipopolysaccharides (LPS) prior to vaccine formulation, as previously described using Triton X-114 [33 (link)]. To formulate the cVLP:IL1β vaccines, the Catcher-cVLP and Tag-IL1β antigens were mixed in a 1:2 molar ratio and incubated O/N at 4 °C. Excess unbound antigen was removed by density gradient ultracentrifugation using an Optiprep™ (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) Step gradient (23, 29, and 35%) [31 (link)]. Purified cVLP:IL-1β vaccines were dialysed against sterile PBS, pH 7.4, using a cutoff of 1000 kDa (SpectrumLabs). All vaccines were subjected to a centrifugation stability test (16,000× g for 2 min). An equal number of pre- and post-spin samples were loaded on SDS-PAGE to assess potential precipitation, indicating vaccine aggregation. Antigen concentration on the cVLP and coupling efficiency (calculated as cVLP subunits/coupled cVLP subunits + uncoupled cVLP subunits) were estimated by densitometry from SDS-PAGE gels using ImageQuant TL (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Autophosphorylation and Phosphotransfer Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified His-SUMO-EssS(191–488), CenR, and EssR were diluted to 5 μM with 1x kinase buffer (250 mM Tris pH8, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, 1 mM DTT). 5 μl of ATP mix (4.5 μl 250 μM ATP, pH 7, 0.5 μl [32P]-ATP (10 μCi/μl) was added to 45 μl of 5 μM His-SUMO-EssS and the protein was allowed to autophosphorylate for 1h at room temperature. 5 μl of His-SUMO-EssS~P was mixed with 5 μl 1x kinase buffer and SDS loading buffer as the autophosphorylation control. To assess phosphoryl transfer, His-SUMO-EssS~P was mixed with equimolar of CenR, EssR, or a CenR/EssR mixture at various CenR:EssR molar ratios. Each phosphoryl transfer reaction was quenched with equal volume of SDS loading buffer. Reaction samples were loaded onto a 12% mini-PROTEAN precast gel (BioRad) and resolved at 180V at room temperature. The dye front of the gel was cut off and the rest of the gel was exposed to a phosphoscreen for 1–2h at room temperature. The phosphoscreen was imaged on a Typhoon phosphorimager (Cytiva), and gel band intensity was quantified using ImageQuant TL (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Apoptotic Cells by Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The identification of apoptotic cells by fluorescence microscopy and immunoblot analysis were described previously [16 (link)]. The protein bands were quantified using Image Quant TL software (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RAD51 Binding to DNA and Nucleosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nucleosomes (0.1 µM) or the 153-base-pair DNA (0.01 µM) and RAD51 or RAD51 mutants (0.24, 0.48 and 0.72 μM for DNA-binding assay, and 1.2, 2.4 and 3.6 μM for nucleosome-binding assay) were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in the reaction buffer (20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 15 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.03% NP-40 and 1.5% glycerol) in the absence or presence of 1 mM ATP, ADP or AMP-PNP. The samples were analysed by 4% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 0.5× TBE buffer (45 mM Tris-borate and 1 mM EDTA), followed by ethidium bromide staining. Band intensities were quantitated by an Amersham Imager 680 with ImageQuant TL (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing ER Stress Response in DYT16 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphoblasts derived from a compound heterozygous DYT16 patient containing both P222L and C213R mutations as independent alleles were cultured alongside lymphoblasts derived from a family member containing no mutations in PACT as our control wt cells. Cells were plated at a concentration of 300,000 cells/ml of RPMI media containing 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin. To analyze cellular response to ER stress, we treated cells with 5 μg/ml of tunicamycin (Santa Cruz) over a 24-h time course and harvested cells in RIPA (150 mM NaCl, 1.0% IGEPAL® CA-630, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0) buffer containing a 1:100 dilution of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) and phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma). Concentration of total protein extract was then determined using BCA assay and appropriate amounts of extracts were analyzed by western blot analyses using appropriate antibodies as indicated. When the cells were treated with luteolin prior to tunicamycin treatment, luteolin was added at 50 µM for 24 h. Quantification of band intensities was done using the Imagequant TL (Cytiva) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Detecting Protein Interactions Using Tags

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEFsKeap1−/− cells were lysed as previously described [68 (link)]. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, and proteins were blotted to PVDF membranes. For detection, we used antibodies against the tags of the transfected proteins of interest in order to avoid the interference of endogenous proteins and the poor performance of commercially available antibodies for our purpose. Antibodies were used against Myc-Tag (#2276S, 1:1000 dilution) from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA), HA-Tag (#3724S, 1:1000 dilution) from Cell Signaling, beta-actin (#8457S, 1:1000 dilution) from Cell Signaling and FBXW11 (#13149-1-AP, 1:000 dilution) from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA). Densitometric quantification was performed with ImageQuant™ TL, Cytiva (Tokyo, Japan)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative ImageQuant Densitometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all densitometry measurements, we utilized ‘imagequant’ quant (ImageQuant TL, Cytiva) and statistical analysis and graphing was performed with Microsoft Excel software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification of CaMKIIβ Isoforms from Insect Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selected CaMKIIβ isoforms were expressed in High Five insect cells via the baculovirus system. All purification steps were performed at 4°C. Cell pellets were resuspended in CaMKII lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 5% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT) supplemented with protease inhibitors (cOmplete; Roche) and lysed by sonication. Insoluble particles were separated by centrifugation at 21,500 rpm for 1 h (JA-25.50 fixed-angle rotor; Beckman Coulter). The soluble fraction was incubated with Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads (IBA Lifesciences) for 1 h and washed with CaMKII lysis buffer. Bound protein was eluted with CaMKII SEC buffer (50 mM Pipes, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT) containing 2.5 mM desthiobiotin (IBA Lifesciences). Eluted protein was concentrated and run on a Superose 6 10/300 Gl size-exclusion column (Cytiva) with CaMKII SEC buffer. Fractions were pooled according to SDS–PAGE and chromatogram, concentrated to ∼1 mg/ml, and flash-frozen in single-use aliquots in liquid nitrogen. Before use, aliquots were thawed on ice, gently mixed by pipetting, and centrifuged at 20,000 rcf for 5 min. Exactly equal concentrations were determined by repeated SDS–PAGE, Coomassie staining, and quantification with ImageQuant TL (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!