The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using jem 2010f electron microscope

1

Cryo-EM Imaging of PRD1 Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of 2.5–3 µl of purified PRD1 particle suspension (Table 1) were applied to 400 mesh R1.2/1.3 Quantifoil grids (Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH), blotted for 2 s and immediately frozen in liquid ethane using an automated vitrification device: either a Vitrobot MarkIII (FEI) or a Cryo-Plunger 3 (Gatan). Images were taken with a 300 kV JEM3200FSC electron microscope (JEOL) equipped with in-column energy filter. A slit width of 20 eV was used for data collection. The first dataset of the virion and all procapsid data was recorded at 80 K×nominal magnification (1.42 Å/pixel sampling) with a dose of 20 e/Å2 using a Ultrascan 4000 CCD camera (Gatan) with defocus ranging from 0.5 to ∼2 µm (Table S2). The second dataset of virion was collected using a Ultrascan 10000 CCD camera (Gatan) binned by 2 (1.3 Å/pixel sampling) with a defocus range from 1 to 3 µm. All mutant particles were imaged on a 200 kV JEM2010F electron microscope (JEOL) with a dose of 25 e•Å−2 using a Ultrascan 4000 CCD camera (Gatan) at 40–60 k×nominal magnification sampling from 1.81 to 2.18 Å/pixel and defocus ranging from 1.5 to 3 µm (Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanomaterial Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM; Ultra 60 field, Zeiss 1550 VP Inc.) which operated at 9.00 kV and a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM; JEM-2010F electron microscope (JEOL, Japan)) were used for the morphological characterization. All PC and TCP nanofibrous samples were sputtered with gold in argon gas for 2 min and at 30 mA to be imaged by SEM for enhanced image resolution and conductivity. The diameters of the PC and TCP nanofiber images were examined by using ImageJ software based on the collection of different positions of the nanofibers obtained. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis was carried out using a BRUKER Vertex FTIR spectrometer for identifying different chemical species. A high performance Raman analyzer (ProRaman-L Analyzer) with an excitation laser beam wavelength of 532 nm, and a PANalytical-Empyrean X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) using copper Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) in the range of 5° to 80° at a scan rate (2θ) of 3° s−1 were used for structural characterization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Nanostructure Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The images of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) were taken using a JEOL JEM-2010F electron microscope operated at 200 kV. High-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM imaging (HAADF-STEM) was performed on an aberration-corrected JEM-ARM 200F operated at 300 kV, which provides a nominal image resolution of 0.07 nm. An energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyzer attached to the aberration-corrected JEM-ARM 200F operated in the STEM mode was used to analyze the element distributions of the obtained core-shell nanostructures. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were recorded by a Bruker D8 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm), and the X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were collected using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha XPS spectrometer. The ICP-AES test was conducted on Thermo Scientific 6300 to determine the accurate content of the corresponding component in as-prepared core-shell samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanoscale Characterization of Ni-Fe Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is performed by ZEISS SUPRA™ 35 at 3 kV to study the morphological characteristics of the Ni-Fe electrodes. Elemental distribution is investigated by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using a X-MAX, 80 mm2 system by Oxford Instruments. Additionally, atomic scale morphology and chemical information is gained combining cross-sectional Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM), coupled with Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS), using a JEOL JEM 2010F electron microscope with a 200 kV accelerating voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Material Characterization by XRD, TEM, XPS, and Adsorption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku MiniFlex600 powder diffractometer employing monochromatic Cu Kα radiation and operating at 15 mA and 40 kV. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired using a JEM-2010F electron microscope (Jeol). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were acquired using an ESCA-3400 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Shimadzu). The binding energies determined using XPS were corrected with reference to the C 1s peak (284.6 eV) for each sample. N2 adsorption isotherms were measured using a BELSORP-mini instrument (MicrotracBEL) at liquid nitrogen temperature. H2O adsorption isotherms were acquired at 298 K using a BELSORP-max (MicrotracBEL) instrument. Samples were heated at 473 K for 1 h under vacuum prior to the measurements for both N2 and H2O adsorption isotherms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of CuO@MnO2 Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallography and chemical composition of the as-prepared products were investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/max 1200, Cu K) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet 5DXC). The morphologies of the CuO@MnO2 composites were observed with focused ion beam (Zeiss Auriga FIB/SEM). Microstructures were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM, and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using JEOL JEM-2010F electron microscope operated at 200 kV. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured at 77 K using micrometritics ASAP 2020 sorptometer. Specific surface area was determined with Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation, and the distribution of pore size was calculated from the adsorption curve by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Characterization of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle yield Y was defined as follows. where Wcollect is the weight of final products after washing and drying and Wtheory is the maximum particle weight of Fe2O3 when the reaction is complete. X-ray diffraction patterns of the products were obtained via X-ray diffraction (XRD) (MiniFlex600-C; Rigaku Corp.) using Cu Kα radiation. The crystallite size was evaluated using the Scherrer equation, where 0.90 of shape factor was used. The products were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (H-7650; Hitachi Corp.) operated at 100 kV. High resolution TEM (HR-TEM) images and electron diffraction pattern of particle colony were acquired using a JEOL JEM-2010F electron microscope operated at 200 kV. The solid products for TEM and HR-TEM analysis were dispersed in cyclohexane before transferred onto the copper grids with a organic membrane. The mean size, with their standard deviation, of the particles was determined by observing approximately 200 particles for TEM analysis. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed from room temperature to 600 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C min−1 and at N2 atmosphere using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) (TGA-50; Shimadzu Corp.). The absorbed state of an organic surfactant on the iron oxide surface was investigated using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) (FT-IR4100; JASCO Co., Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Metallic Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), and scanning TEM (STEM) were performed on a JEOL JEM-2010F electron microscope operated at 200 kV with the supplied software for automated electron tomography. For the TEM measurements, a drop of the nanoparticle solution was dispensed onto a 3 mm carbon-coated copper grid, and excessive solution was removed by an absorbent paper. Then the sample was dried under vacuum at room temperature. An energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyzer attached to the TEM operated in the STEM mode was used to analyze the chemical compositions of the synthesized nanoparticles. UV-visible spectra of Ag, core-shell Pt@Ag, core-shell-shell Pt@Ag@Ag-Pd and CBS Pt-Pd colloidal solutions in toluene were collected on a Hitachi U-3900 spectrophotometer. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Bruker D8 diffractometer, using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm). The content of Ag in core-shell-shell Pt@Pd@Ag-Pd nanoparticles after NaCl treatment was determined using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) technique on a Perkin Elmer 6300 spectrograph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-Resolution TEM Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM images were acquired with a JEOL JEM-2010F electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV, a field-emission source, and an ultrahigh-resolution pole piece (Cs=0.5 mm) with a 1.9 Å Scherzer limit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Cysteine-Coated Europium Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UV-Visible spectra were recorded on a Nanodrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, WA, USA). The photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy measurements were performed on the RF-6000 Spectro fluorophotometer (Shimadzu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea). The TEM was performed with selected area diffraction (SAED), using a JEM-2010F electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. For the TEM, 0.1% sample solutions were dropped onto a mesh copper grid and the solvents evaporated on a hotplate. The particle size distribution was calculated based on the TEM images, using Image J software. The functional group of nanoparticles was analyzed through FTIR spectroscopy (PerkinElmer Spectrum Version 10.5.1, Korea) and the surface charge and stability of the Cys Au-EuNPs was also confirmed through a zeta potential analyzer (ELSZ-1000 common Version 5.22/3.00, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!