The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Medrad

Manufactured by Bayer
Sourced in Germany, United States

Medrad is a line of medical devices and equipment produced by Bayer. Medrad products are designed for diagnostic imaging and interventional procedures. The core function of Medrad equipment is to assist healthcare professionals in the administration of contrast media and the monitoring of patients during medical imaging examinations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using medrad

1

Contrast Agent Dosing for Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contrast agents were injected using a dual syringe power injection, (Medrad®, Spectris Solaris®, Bayer Healthcare Inc, Whippany, NJ) with the first syringe filled with contrast agent, and the second with saline. Gadoteridol was administered using the 0.1 mmol/kg standard dose. Ferumoxytol was given either in a 2 mg/kg dose (17 subjects), or as a total dose of 75mg (37 subjects), depending on the protocol. The latter group was considered as a 1 mg/kg dose ferumoxytol group (mean ferumoxytol dose per body weight ±SD: 0.91±0.23 mg/kg). Ferumoxytol was 1:1 diluted with normal saline, resulting in 15mg/ml iron concentration.
To evaluate for potential saturation of peak amplitude during first pass, dose was also expressed as mg injected contrast agent per total circulating blood volume estimated using the Nadler’s formula (20 (link)):
total blood volume in males=0.3669·Ht3+0.03219·Wt+0.6041
total blood volume in females=0.3561·Ht3+0.03308·Wt+0.1833 where Ht denotes the height in meters, and Wt is the body weight in kilograms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dual-Energy CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each dual-energy CT scan was conducted using a third-generation dual-source CT system (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Imaging was performed in the portal venous phase, initiated 80 s after the administration of a body weight-adjusted contrast medium (0.5 mL/kg, Imeron 400, Bracco, Milan, Italy), delivered at a rate of 2.0 ± 0.5 mL/s using a dual-syringe injection system (Medrad, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) and followed by a 40 mL saline flush. Image acquisition utilized dynamic tube current modulation technology (CareDose4D, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) to optimize the dose during the scans. The dual-energy CT protocol included settings of 100 kV for tube A and tin-filtered 150 kV (Sn150 kV) for tube B, which were calibrated to reference tube current–time products of 190 mAs for tube A and 95 mAs for tube B. The system featured a collimation of 0.6 × 192 mm, a helical pitch of 0.6 and a gantry rotation duration of half a second. Reconstructions of the dual-energy series were generated on a specialized DECT workstation (syngo.via VB10B, Siemens Healthineers) in both the axial and coronal planes with thin 1.5 mm slices.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dual-Bolus Myocardial Perfusion Phantom Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual‐bolus perfusion scans were acquired using a validated hardware phantom with a synthetic multicapillary myocardium.25, 26 The phantom was scanned on a 3‐T system (Biograph mMR; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a 12‐channel anterior/posterior phased‐array coil system. One slice was acquired over the synthetic myocardium for a fixed reference MBF of 3 mL/g/min. Scanning was repeated three times for each of three different input HR simulated with retrospective ECG triggering (60 bpm, 90 bpm, and 120 bpm). A saturation recovery spoiled gradient echo sequence with fixed parameters was used: TR = 2.1 msec, TE = 1.1 msec, saturation recovery time = 100 msec, flip angle = 10°, pixel bandwidth = 1002 Hz, field of view = 280 × 210 mm2, acquired/reconstructed resolution = 1.5 × 1.5 mm2, slice thickness = 8 mm, and parallel acceleration factor = 2. Matching the clinical dual‐bolus MR perfusion protocol used in our institution, a dilute and a neat CA bolus with concentrations 0.0075 mmol/kg and 0.075 mmol/kg, respectively (Gadobutrol, Gadovist®, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) were injected in the vena cava of the phantom at 4 mL/sec using an injector pump (Spectris Solaris, Medrad®, Bayer AG). Each bolus was followed by a 25‐mL saline flush.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Prostate mpMRI for Diagnostic Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent prostate mpMRI on a 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Skyra, Siemens Medical Systems, Germany); the mpMRI scans were performed with an 18-channel phased-array surface coil and a liquid perfluorocarbon-filled ERC (Medrad, Bayer). All mpMRI scans were acquired at least six weeks after the biopsy to minimize the negative influence of post-biopsy hemorrhage on the diagnostic evaluation. The prostate mpMRI protocol comprised tri-planar T2-weighted imaging, DWI, and DCE imaging from the first to the last. The detailed parameters regarding the MRI sequences are given in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 600–1,000 ml oral dose of water was used to dilate the gastric cavity immediately before CT examination. CT examinations were performed using a 64 multidetector CT scanner (Discovery CT750HD; GE Healthcare). A conventional axial scan (120 kV; 350 mA; field of view, 500 mm; matrix, 512×512; section thickness, 0.75 mm) was performed before and after intravenous injection of nonionic iohexol (iopromide; 370 mg/ml; GE Medical Systems; 1.5 ml/kg and 3 ml/sec) using a dual-head pump injector (Medrad®; Bayer AG). Finally, 20 ml of saline flush was injected at a rate of 3 ml/sec. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed with scanning delays of 30 sec (arterial phase) and 70 sec (portal venous phase) after the start of intravenous (i.v.) injection of iopromide. The CT dose index volume for all three phases was 15 mSv.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Contrast-enhanced whole-body DECT protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All DECT were contrast-enhanced (Imeron 400, Bracco, Milan, Italy) whole-body examinations and performed on the same 3rd generation dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Force; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Contrast agent (patients’ bodyweight in kg + 15 = contrast agent in mL) as well as a subsequent saline flush (40 mL) were administered through a peripheral vein cannula by a double syringe power injector (Medrad; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/s. Image acquisition took place in a portal venous phase (90 s after the application). Attenuation-based tube current modulation (CARE Dose4D, reference mAs 190) was activated for the examination. Tube voltage was set to 100/Sn150 (tube A 100 kV, tube B tin-filtered 150 kV). Collimation was set to 0.6 × 192/128 mm, pitch was 0.6, and gantry rotation time 0.5 s. A quantitative medium-soft kernel without overshoots (Qr40d) was used with iterative beam hardening correction (IBHC) set to iodine for image reconstruction. The CT datasets were reconstructed in axial orientation with a slice thickness and an increment of 1 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Neck CT Protocol with Contrast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All neck CT examinations were performed with iodine contrast medium (Iomeron 400, Bracco, Konstanz, Germany) at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/s using an automated double syringe power injector (Medrad, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany). All investigations were performed on a third-generation dual-source CT scanner with 2 × 192 slices (Somatom Force, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany): single-energy mode with activated automatic attenuation-based tube-current modulation for exposure control (CareDose4D); automatic kV selection (CareKV); gantry rotation, 0.25 s; pitch, 0.7; collimation, 0.6 × 40 × 2 mm (with z-flying focal spot). A double bolus was administered as standard for optimal soft tissue contrast: image acquisition 3 min after the first bolus (70 mL) and 30 s after the second bolus (20 mL), followed by a saline flush. The CT scans were performed at a reference tube voltage of 120 kVp and reference tube current–time product of 200 mAs. All images were reconstructed with ADMIRE strength 2, Bv40d kernel, 3 mm thick sections, and 3 mm section increments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Standardized CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were scanned using Philips 256-slice Brilliance iCT (standard tube voltage, 120 KV; tube current, automatic trigger tube current; scanning layer thickness, 0.9 mm; layer spacing, 0.4 mm; and collimation, 128±0.625 mm; Philips Medical Systems B.V., Holland, The Netherlands). One dual-tube high-pressure syringe (Medrad, Inc.; Bayer HealthCare, Indianola, PA, USA) was used to inject the non-ionic contrast agent (Iopromide, 300 mg/ml; 1.5 ml/kg; Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group, Ltd., Jiangsu, China) and 20 ml of physiological saline via the ulnar vein. Each patient was inspected in the supine position with a venous injection speed of 4 ml/sec. The scanning range was from the thoracic entrance to the diaphragm level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparametric MRI of Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients underwent preoperative MRI performed using a 3-T system (Achieva MR, Philips Healthcare) with a six-channel cardiac phased-array coil placed around the pelvis and an endorectal coil (Medrad, Bayer HealthCare). A 1-mg dose of Glucagon (Glucagon, Eli Lilly) was injected before MRI was performed, to limit peristalsis of the rectal wall. Multiparametric MR images of the prostate, including T2-weighted, DW, and DCE images, were obtained. The typical MRI parameters that were used are described in detail in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients underwent preoperative MRI with a 3T Philips Achieva MR system with a 6-channel cardiac phased array coil placed around the pelvis, and with or without endorectal coil (Medrad, Bayer Healthcare). For patients undergoing imaging using an endorectal coil, a 1mg dose of Glucagon (Glucagon, Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis) was injected prior to MR imaging to limit peristalsis of the rectal wall. T2W images and multi echo T2W images for T2 maps were acquired. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups (Group A–C). Group A (n = 15) was imaged without any endorectal coil using turbo spin echo (TSE) imaging pulse sequence for both T2W images and T2 mapping. Group B (n = 15) was imaged with an endorectal coil using TSE for both T2W images and T2 mapping. Group C (n = 15) was imaged with an endorectal coil using TSE for T2W images and the recently developed k-t-T2 sequence (18 (link)) for T2 mapping. Table 1 provides details of the imaging parameters used.
T2 maps were calculated using an in-house MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA) program on a voxel by voxel basis from multi-echo T2-weighted images using a mono-exponential signal decay model:
S=S0exp(-TE/T2) where S is the signal at each echo time (TE) and S0 is the extrapolated signal at TE = 0 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!