We obtained an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval to perform the study experiments. We evaluated five VSDs: the Caiman 5 (C5; Aesculap, Inc., Center Valley, PA), Harmonic Scalpel Ace Plus (HA; Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH),
Harmonic Ace +7 (HA7; Ethicon Endosurgery),
LigaSure (LS; Covidien, Mansfield, MA), and
Enseal G2 (ES; Ethicon Endosurgery). We used each VSD according to the settings recommended by the manufacturer.
There were three phases to the study methodology, including
in vivo dissection,
ex vivo testing of bursting pressure, and finally histopathologic examination of vessel seals.
We used 15 Yorkshire pigs (30–35 kg) to evaluate the 5 devices (total 3 pigs per device). The surgeons performing the testing (Z.O. and J.L.) were experienced with all the energy devices. Despite surgeon familiarity, one pig was utilized to train the surgeons on tissue and vessel sealing in the porcine model to mitigate any device-specific learning curve.
Okhunov Z., Yoon R., Lusch A., Spradling K., Suarez M., Kaler K.S., Patel R., Hwang C., Osann K., Huang J., Lee T, & Landman J. (2018). Evaluation and Comparison of Contemporary Energy-Based Surgical Vessel Sealing Devices. Journal of Endourology, 32(4), 329-337.