The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse anti myc 9b11

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, France

Mouse anti-Myc (9B11) is a primary antibody that specifically recognizes the Myc protein. It can be used for the detection and analysis of Myc expression in various experimental applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using mouse anti myc 9b11

1

Multimodal Analysis of RUFY4 Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 25–50 µg of TX-100 soluble material was separated by 3–15% gradient or 12% SDS–PAGE prior immunoblotting and chemiluminescence detection (Pierce). Antibodies used in this study were anti-RUY4 raised in rabbit against peptides 375–391 and 454–470 of mouse RUFY4. Mouse Anti-Myc (9B11, Cell Signaling), mouse Anti-Flag (M2, Sigma), rat anti-LAMP1 (134B, Biolegend), mouse anti-AIF (E-1, Santa Cruz), mouse anti-SDHA (2E3GC12, Abcam), mouse anti-LC3 (2G6, NanoTools), mouse anti-ß-actin (AC-15, Sigma). Secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch, Molecular Probes (USA) and from Cell Signaling Technology. For immunofluorescence, cells on coverslips were fixed with 3.5% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. Images were taken by a Zeiss LSM780 or Leica SP5 confocal microscope using 63× or 40× objective. Processing and quantification was performed using Fiji software [37 (link)]. Co-localization was quantified using JACoP plugin [38 (link)]. Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism. For two sets of values, we used t-tests, for multiple sets of values one-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. MitoTracker DeepRed and MitoTracker Green staining was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermofhisher) and detected by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibody Characterization and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-HA (PRB-101P; Covance), rabbit anti-SPP (ab16080; Abcam), rabbit anti–hepatitis C core (R4210; gift from J. McLauchlan, Medical Research Council–University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, Scotland, UK), mouse anti–HO-1 (ab13248; Abcam), mouse anti-myc (9B11; Cell Signaling Technology), mouse anti–β-actin (A5316; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit anti-RAMP4/4-2 (A18; sc-85114; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), mouse anti-calnexin (AF8) and rabbit anti-GFP (A11122; Invitrogen), rabbit anti-US2 (177–5; ER luminal domain; a gift from E. Wiertz, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands), mouse anti–MHC-I (W6/32; ATCC), goat anti–mouse Alexa 647 (Invitrogen), goat anti–mouse IRDye 800 and goat anti–rabbit IRDye 680 (LI-COR Biosciences), and goat anti–mouse HRP and goat anti–rabbit HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Subcellular Localization of Circadian Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously57 (link). The following antibodies were used: mouse anti-myc (9B11, 1:500; Cell Signalling Technology), mouse anti-pdf (C7, 1:1000; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) and anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568 (1:400; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The specimens were mounted using Vectashield mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories). Images were captured using an FV3000 (Olympus) confocal microscope and processed using Imaris software (Bitplane). For quantification of the localisation pattern of myc-DapmaCRYA-D and myc-Drome-CRY in cell bodies of l-LNv or s-LNv, one- to four-day-old adult male flies were entrained to a 12-h:12-h light-dark cycle (LD; light: 200 lux) at 25 °C for 3 d. A total of 10–13 brains were immunostained and imaged at each time point (ZT 1, 5, 9, 13, 17 and 21). The areas of nucleus and cytoplasm were selected using freehand selection in Fiji, an open-source image analysis software58 (link). Selection of the regions of interests (ROIs) was performed by experimenters who were blind with respect to the genotype. The mean fluorescence intensities of the ROIs were then calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Caveolin-1 Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cav1-GFP, Cav1-mCherry, and Cav1-myc were as described previously15 (link)16 (link). Details of different Cav1 constructs used are described in Supplementary Table S1. Rabbit anti-Cav1 polyclonal antibody (catalog number 610059) and mouse monoclonal (mAb) anti-Cav1 clone 2234 (mAb 2234, catalog number 610494) were purchased from BD Biosciences. Mouse anti-Myc (9B11) was procured from Cell Signaling. Rabbit Anti-Giantin (# ab24586) was purchased from AbCam, whereas mouse anti-Golgin97 (Clone CDF4) was obtained from Thermo Scientific. Mouse anti-Vimentin (# V6389) was purchased from Sigma. Chicken anti-vimentin (Clone Poly 29191) was purchased from Biolegend. Mouse anti-Ubiquitin (Fk2) (# BML-PW8810-0500) and anti-20S proteasome antibodies (# BML-PW8115-0025) were procured from Enzo Life Sciences. Mouse anti-VCP/p97 (# NB120-11433) antibody was purchased from Novus Biological. Anti-GFP antibody (Clone JL8) was purchased from Geneclone. Anti-Beta tubulin antibody E7 was procured from DSHB, UIOWA. MG132, Nocodazole, DMSO and chloroquine were purchased from Sigma. Cycloheximide was procured from MP Biomedicals. VCP/p97 inhibitor DBeQ was procured from Tocris. Lipofectamine 2000 and Prolong Gold anti-fade mounting reagent were obtained from Life Technologies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rootletin Antibody Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies were obtained from the indicated suppliers: goat anti-Rootletin for immunostaining (sc-67824) and mouse anti-Rootletin for immunoblotting (sc-374056; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA); mouse anti-acetylated tubulin (6–11B-1), mouse anti-FLAG (M2), and mouse anti-gamma-tubulin (T3559; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); mouse anti-Myc (9B11; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA); and rabbit anti-Pericentrin 2 (ab4448) and HRP-conjugated anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, ab9385; Abcam, MA). Species-specific secondary antibodies were conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or 555 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Western blot analyses were performed as described previously31 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence and TEM Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures (TEM and Immunofluoresence) were performed as previously described [14 (link), 15 (link)]. The primary antibodies used in this study were: mouse anti-elav (9F8A9, 1:200, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank); mouse anti-Crumbs (Cq4, 1:100, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-aPKC ζ (zeta) (1:200, SAB4502380 Sigma), mouse anti-HA (6E2, 1:500, Cell Signaling), mouse anti-myc (9B11, 1:500 Cell Signaling), rat anti-Crumbs (1:500) [73 (link)], mouse anti-armadillo (N2 7A1, 1:100, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). The C-terminal peptide KVNKLISRFEGGRPRLC (produced in the laboratory of Dr. Charles Zuker) was used as the antigen in rabbits, and the resulting antibody was used at a concentration of 1:200. Fluorescent conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from either Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories or Life Technologies. Rhodamine or Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated phalloidin (1:200, Life Technologies) were utilized for the detection of F-Actin. Confocal images were captured on a Leica TCS SP5. TEM imaging was conducted with a JOEL 1010 and JOEL 1400. All images were processed in Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibodies for VAPB and PTPIP51 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rat and rabbit antibodies to VAPB and PTPIP51 have been described previously and were generated by immunization with GST‐VAPB(1–220) and GST‐PTPIP51(36–470) 5. Rabbit PTPIP51 antibody (FAM82A2) was from Atlas Antibodies. Rabbit anti‐haemagglutinin (HA), mouse anti‐α‐tubulin (DM1A) and rabbit anti‐mitofusin‐2 were from Sigma. Mouse anti‐myc (9B11) and rabbit anti‐glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were from Cell Signaling. Rabbit anti‐FUS (NB100‐565) was from Novus Biologicals. Rabbit anti‐TOM20 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology and mouse anti‐PDI (RL77) was from Affinity Bioreagents. Antibodies to total and ser9 phosphorylated (inactive) GSK‐3β were from BD Transduction Labs (mouse 610201) and Cell Signalling (rabbit 9336), respectively. Rabbit anti‐GFP (Ab290) was from Abcam. GSK‐3β inhibitors AR‐A014418 and CT99021 were from Abcam and Cayman, respectively, and made up as 1 mM or 100 μM stocks in DMSO; KCN was from Sigma and made up as a 1 M stock in water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibody Generation and Characterization for Phosphorylated FE65

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit anti-FE65 and rabbit anti-APP A5137 were as described5 (link). Goat anti-FE65 E20 and mouse anti-α-tubulin DM1A were obtained from Santa Cruz. Mouse anti-myc 9B11, mouse anti-GFP JL8, mouse anti-HA 12CA5, rabbit anti-GST and mouse anti-APP 22C11 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Clontech, Roche, Sigma and Millipore, respectively.
The phospho-specific antibody against phosphorylated FE65 at T579 (pT579 FE65) was generated by immunizing rats with a synthetic FE65 phosphopeptide (amino acids 575–586; REQW(pT)PSHVSVC) (GenScript) which contains a phosphorylated T579. A cysteine (C) residue was introduced to the peptide C-terminus for carrier protein conjugation and purification column coupling. Phosphopeptide conjugation was performed using the Imject Maleimide Activated mcKLH Spin kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). The immunized rat sera were purified by the non-phosphopeptide (REQWTPSHVSVC) and then phosphopeptide coupled columns prepared by using a SulfoLink Immobilization kit for peptides (ThermoFisher Scientific). The antibody was eluted and dialyzed against PBS/0.05% sodium azide, and then concentrated by using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Unit with Ultracel-10 membrane (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blotting and Immunofluorescence Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For western blotting, the following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Phospho-S6-ribosomal protein (Ser240/244, Cell Signaling 1:1000), rabbit anti-Phospho p70S6K (Thr 389, Cell Signaling 1:1000), mouse anti-actin (Sigma 1:1000), goat anti-rabbit or mouse peroxidase conjugated secondary-antibodies (Sigma, 1:10,000). For immunofluorescence, were used: mouse anti-Map2B (Millipore 1:1000), chicken-anti-Map2B (PhosphoSolutions, 1:500), rabbit anti-Phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (Ser240/244, Cell Signalling, 1:800), rabbit anti-mTOR (Cell Signaling, 1:300), rat anti-LAMP1 (1D4B; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, USA, 1:1500), mouse anti-FLAG (Sigma,1:1000) and mouse anti-myc 9B11 (Cell Signalling, 1:1500), appropriate fluorescent Alexa-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, 1:2500).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detection of Protein Markers in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies were mouse anti-Myc (9B11) (Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-FLAG (F7425) (Merck), mouse anti-HA (6E2) (Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-human GPVI cytoplasmic tail [46 (link)], mouse anti-human GPVI (11A7) [47 (link)], mouse anti-human GPVI (336A9) (Bernhard Nieswandt, unpublished), mouse anti-human ADAM10 (11G2) (a gift from Eric Rubinstein, Paris, France) [47 (link)] and control mouse IgG1 (MOPC-21) (MP Biomedicals).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!