The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Laser doppler monitor

Manufactured by Moor Instruments
Sourced in United Kingdom, Netherlands

The Laser Doppler Monitor is a non-invasive device that measures blood flow and perfusion. It uses a laser beam to detect the Doppler shift in reflected light, which is proportional to the velocity of moving red blood cells. This provides a real-time, continuous measurement of microvascular blood flow.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using laser doppler monitor

1

Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two weeks after virus injection, mice underwent a 60-minute tMCAO surgery. The protocol of tMCAO surgery was described in the previous study [18 (link)]. Briefly, the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was occluded by a 6–0 suture (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) with a silicone-coated round tip. During the surgery, mice body temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C using a heating pad (RWD Life Science) with a feedback control. The blood flow in MCA was measured by Laser Doppler monitor (Moor instruments, Devon, U.K.) before MCAO, at the beginning of occlusion and 1 minute after reperfusion. Animals whose MCA blood flow did not decrease to 10%~20% of baseline during occlusion or did not recover to 40%~60% of baseline after reperfusion were excluded from this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Systemic Physiological Monitoring during NIRS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Systemic physiological monitoring data were collected simultaneously with NIRS measurements. Arterial blood pressure (ABP) was measured with a Portapres® system (Finapres Medical Systems, the Netherlands); scalp blood flow was measured by Laser Doppler Monitor (Moor Instruments); and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate were measured with a clinical monitor IntelliVue (Philips, the Netherlands). Systemic changes were block-averaged according to epoch and averaged across nine subjects. For each systemic variable, the response for each subject was defined as the difference between the mean of the first 10s window of activation and the mean of the first 10s window during the black screen period. Paired t-tests were used to compare the responses across nine subjects to zero, identical to the statistical analysis done for the NIRS signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!