The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Btx ecm 830 electroporator

Manufactured by Harvard Apparatus
Sourced in United States

The BTX ECM 830 electroporator is a laboratory instrument used for the introduction of foreign molecules, such as DNA, RNA, or other macromolecules, into cells through the process of electroporation. The device generates and delivers controlled electrical pulses to samples, temporarily increasing the permeability of cell membranes to facilitate the uptake of the desired materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

38 protocols using btx ecm 830 electroporator

1

Knockdown of Genes in Adult Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microinjection and electroporation of morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs; Gene-Tools, LLC, Philomath, OR) was used as described for knockdown experiments in adult zebrafish [20 (link)–22 (link)]. Briefly, lissamine-tagged MOs (~0.2 μL, 1 mM in nuclease-free H2O) were directly microinjected into the LR muscle followed by electroporation (6 to 10 pulses at 48 V/cm, BTX ECM830 electroporator; Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). Microinjections were performed 3 h prior to LR injury, and MO uptake was confirmed via lissamine fluorescence prior to myectomy. MOs were designed to target the 5′-UTR of respective mRNAs (translational blocking MOs), and were compared to a standard control MO (CON) targeting a human beta-globin intron mutation. When possible, previously published MOs were utilized (Table 3). For all others, MO sequence design was performed as a service by Gene Tools. All MOs were injected at the same concentration, and all experiments were performed using 5 fish per experimental group per time point, unless stated otherwise in the text and/or figure legend. No significant mortality was noted.

Sequence of the morpholino antisense oligonucleotides (MOs)

SequenceReference
ezh25′-CGATTTCCTCCCGGTCAATCCCATG[62 (link)]
fn1a5′-TTTTTTCACAGGTGCGATTGAACAC[63 (link)]
suz12a5′-GAGCCATCCTAAAATAGCGTTCGTG[64 (link)]
Control (CON)5′-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA[65 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In utero Electroporation of Embryonic Mouse Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In utero electroporation was performed as described previously [59 (link)]. Briefly, timed pregnant female mice from E14.5 of gestation were deeply anesthetized, and the uterine horns were gently exposed by laparotomy. The lateral ventricles of an embryonic brain were injected with plasmid DNA (2 μg/μl) and 0.001% fast green (Sigma-Aldrich) using a Picospritzer II (Parker Hannifin). Electroporation was achieved by placing two sterile forceps-type electrodes on opposing sides of the uterine sac around the embryonic head and applying a series of short electrical pulses using a BTX ECM 830 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus) (five pulses with 100 ms length separated by 900 ms intervals were applied at 45 V).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transient Transfection of Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following natural egress, freshly harvested parasites were transfected with plasmids, using protocols previously described (87 (link)). In brief, ~2 × 107 extracellular parasites were resuspended in 370 μL cytomix buffer were mixed with ~30 μL purified plasmid or amplicon DNA in a 4-mm gap BTX cuvette and electroporated using a BTX ECM 830 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus) using the following parameters: 1,700 V, 176-μs pulse length, 2 pulses, 100-ms interval between pulses. Transgenic parasites were isolated by outgrowth under selection with mycophenolic acid (25 μg/mL) and xanthine (50 μg/mL) (MPA/Xa), pyrimethamine (Pyr) (3 mM), chloramphenicol (40 mM), 5-fluorodeoxyuracil (10 μM) (Sigma), Phleomycin (Phleo) (5 μg/ml) (InvivoGen) as needed. Stable clones were isolated by limiting dilution on HFF monolayers grown in 96-well plates (Figure S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Utero Neuronal Migration Manipulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In utero injections and electroporations were performed as previously described (66) in embryos from timed pregnant rats (embryonic day 15) that were anaesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg, IMALGENE 1000; Merial, Lyon, France) / xylazine (10 mg/kg, Rompun 2%; Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany). Wistar rats (Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were raised and mated at INMED Post Genomic Platform (PPGI) animal facility in agreement with the European Union and French legislations. The uterine horns were exposed, and a lateral ventricle of each embryo was injected using pulled glass capillaries and a microinjector (PV 820 Pneumatic PicoPump; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) with Fast Green (2 mg/mL; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) combined with the constructs encoding Cl-Sensor plus scrambled shRNA, or WNK1 shRNA (ratio 1:3).
Plasmids were further electroporated by discharging a 4000 µF capacitor charged to 40 V with a BTX ECM 830 electroporator (BTX Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA). The voltage was discharged in five electrical pulses at 950 ms intervals via tweezer-type electrodes placed on the head of the embryo across the uterine wall. We performed in utero electroporation in embryonic rats at E15, corresponding to an active period of both radial and tangential migration of newborn neurons in the cortex.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Utero Electroporation of Rat Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E16.5 Sprague-Dawley embryos were injected and electroporated in utero. Timed-pregnant E16.5 females were anesthetized with isoflurane after a preoperative dose of buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg), 15 min before surgery. The abdomen was cut, and the uterine horn was exposed. One microliter of DNA (0.5 μg/μl for shRNA Prickle2 and 0.25 μg/μl for control plasmid) prepared in endo-free water mixed with 1% Fast-Green dye (Sigma-Aldrich) was injected through the uterine wall into the lateral ventricle of each embryo using pulled glass capillaries (Harvard Apparatus). Capillaries were prepared using a needle pipette puller (Narishige, PC-100), and injection was performed with a Femtojet injector (Eppendorf). For electroporation, five 50-ms pulses at 55 V with 950-ms breaks were delivered through the embryonic brain to target the cortex using 7-mm electrode paddles connected to a BTX ECM830 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus). After the procedure, the abdomen was filled with a 37°C-warmed PBS solution, and the wound was closed using surgical suture. Animals were put back in their home cage in the animal facility. Rats gave birth at E22.5, and the pups were kept with their mother until collection at P5 or P6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Modification of Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parasites were harvested and resuspended in Cytomix (10 mM KPO4, 120 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 25 mM HEPES, 2 mM EDTA) 1 × 108 parasites/ml, then combined with 10–20 μg pCas9-sgRNA 3′ and 1–5 μg amplicons with 2 mM ATP, 2 mM GSH, and 150 μM CaCl2 to a final volume of 250 µl, followed by electroporation using a BTX ECM 830 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus), as described previously (Soldati and Boothroyd, 1993 (link)). Parasites were selected on the second day with addition of appropriate drugs mycophenolic acid (MPA) (25 µg/ml) and 6-xanthine (6Xa) (50 µg/ml), or pyrimethamine (Pyr) (3 µM). Negative selection was applied with 6-thio-xanthine (200 μg/ml) when parasites were transfected with a pCre plasmid to remove the resistant marker HXGPRT. Positive selection pools of parasites were subcloned in 96-well plates at 3 parasites/well and allowed to grow for 6–7 days before selection of wells containing a single plaque. Pure clones were diagnosed by PCR using appropriate primers (Supplementary file 1d) and IFA analysis using appropriate antibodies if applicable.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vivo Lmnb1 Silencing by Electroporation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Lmnb1 silencing in vivo was carried out by in utero electroporation using Lmnb1 shRNA (Sh-Lmnb1) or scramble-shRNA (Sh-Scr) plasmids as described35 (link). The pregnant female C57BL6/J mouse (E14) was anesthetized using isofluorane. After injection of DNA (3 µg) containing 1% Fast-Green dye (Sigma) through the uterine wall into the lumen of the telencephalic vesicles, each embryo was subjected to electroporation by five square electric pulses (30 mV for 50 ms, 1 s intervals) delivered through platinum electrodes (Sonidel) using a BTX-ECM 830 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus). After electroporation, the abdominal cavity was sutured and the pregnant mouse was administered diclofenac (0.5 mg/kg) (Voltaren, Novartis) by intraperitoneal injection and kept warm until awake. For Lmnb1 knockdown studies, electroporated pups were born and immediately transferred to a foster CD-1 mother. The pups were sacrificed at postnatal day 7 (P7) and the brains collected for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In utero Electroporation of miRNA and Fmr1 in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described23 (link), miRNA or Fmr1 overexpression constructs or Fmr1 shRNA constructs were electroporated in utero into timed pregnant CD-1 mice. Briefly, E12.5 or E14.5 pregnant dams were anaesthetised using pentobarbital sodium, and the uterine horns were exposed. Two to 3 μg/μl of plasmids or 40 µM miRNA antagomirs spiked with Fast Green (Sigma, Louis, Missouri, USA) were injected into the lateral ventricle of the embryo brain. Electroporation was conducted with electric pulses of 20–30 V for 50 ms, which were repeated five times with 950-ms intervals using the BTX-ECM830 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Morpholino Knockdown Experiments in Adult Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microinjection of morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs; Gene-Tools, LLC, Philomath, OR), a widely used technique to perform knockdown experiments in adult zebrafish [29 –31 ], was used. Briefly, lissamine-tagged MOs were directly microinjected into the right LR muscle followed by square-wave electroporation (6 to 10 pulses at 48 V/cm, BTX ECM830 electroporator; Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). Microinjections were performed 3 hours prior to LR injury, and MO uptake was confirmed via lissamine fluorescence prior to myectomy. The MO sequence for igf1ra and igf1rb genes was previously validated in zebrafish [32 , 33 (link)], and a standard MO targeting a human beta-globin intron mutation was used as control. Experiments were performed using 5 fish per experimental group, unless stated otherwise in the text and/or figure legend. No mortality was detected during the experimental process.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Parasites Transfection and Selection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following natural egress, freshly harvested parasites were transfected with plasmids, using protocols previously described (Shen et al., 2014 (link)). In brief, ~2 × 107 extracellular parasites were resuspended in 370 μL cytomix buffer were mixed with ~30 μL purified plasmid or amplicon DNA in a 4-mm gap BTX cuvette and electroporated using a BTX ECM 830 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus) using the following parameters: 1,700 V, 176-μs pulse length, 2 pulses, 100-ms interval between pulses. Transgenic parasites were isolated by outgrowth under selection with mycophenolic acid (25 μg/mL) and xanthine (50 μg/mL) (MPA/Xa), pyrimethamine (Pyr) (3 mM), chloramphenicol (20 mM), 5-fluorodeoxyuracil (10 μM) (Sigma), as needed. Stable clones were isolated by limiting dilution on HFF monolayers grown in 96-well plates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!