The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Allplex sars cov 2 assay

Manufactured by Seegene
Sourced in Cameroon

The Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay is a real-time RT-PCR test designed for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in respiratory specimens. The assay targets multiple genes of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and can be used to aid in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

43 protocols using allplex sars cov 2 assay

1

SARS-CoV-2 Load Evaluation After Remdesivir

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At both baseline (T0) and at day 6 after completing remdesivir treatment (T1), Real-Time-PCR results based on 3 viral gene targets (envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase (RdRp)) were also obtained by AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Seegene). The variation in the cycle threshold (∆CT) values in NS between T1 and T0 were used as a measure of the variation of SARS-CoV-2 load after treatment, and were then used to evaluate the response to remdesivir. Lastly, the variation in SARS-CoV-2 load was analysed in patients according to the presence of the different RdRp mutational profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nasotracheal Lavage for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LTA was considered the index test. It was performed with a nasotracheal tube connected to a vacuum system in an isolated area of the ED by a nurse wearing FFP3 mask, protective goggles and visor, disposable gown/disposable apron/disposable TNT suit, disposable gloves. The patient was positioned upright in a chair or in a bed and soft sterile catheter inserted in a naris while the patient was tilting his head back. When the tip of the catheter reached the back of the throat, the patient had to take breaths in order to ease insertion and let the catheter advance into the larynx-trachea, then the suction pressure was activated for up to five seconds. Once the sample was collected, the suction was stopped and the catheter removed. LTA specimen were collected 24 h a day, 7 days a week, within 8 h from the first negative NPS. rRT-PCR was performed on the specimen to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA by the hospital laboratory. The specimen was processed using GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit. and AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Assay Seegene, Korea. The laboratory analysis and turn round time of LTA was the same of NPS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis using Nasopharyngeal Swabs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A nasopharyngeal swab specimen was collected by healthcare workers and delivered to the microbiological laboratory. There, a technician conducted PCR (AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Assay, Seegene, Seoul, Korea) and RAT (Wonmed Covid-19 Ag, Wonmed, Gyeonggi, Korea). The RAT result was reported as positive or negative. The PCR result was reported as positive, inconclusive, or negative, with the cycle threshold (Ct) was reported in the case of a positive and inconclusive result. The cut-off of cycle threshold was 40. The test evaluated three SARS-CoV-2 genes (E, N, and RdRp gene), and the result was reported as positive only if all three genes were below the cut-off.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 20 SARS-CoV-2 strains, including one wild-type and 19 mutants, were obtained from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) (Table S1). For clinical testing, we used clinical SARS-CoV-2 NP samples (n = 92) and clinically normal NP samples (negative control group, n = 100) collected from SARS-CoV-2-infected (from June 2022 to July 2022) and non-infected (from February 2018 to November 2019) patients at Korea University Guro Hospital. All clinical samples were confirmed using the AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 assay (Seegene Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea). For cross-reactivity testing, a total of 42 clinical respiratory samples (9 of coronavirus (229E, NL63, and OC43), 3 of influenza virus A/H1N1, 3 of influenza virus A/H3N2, 3 of influenza virus B, 3 of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) A, 3 of RSV B, 3 of adenovirus (AdV), 3 of parainfluenza virus (PIV), 3 of human bocavirus (HboV), 3 of human enterovirus (HEV), 3 of human rhinovirus (HRV), and 3 of metapneumovirus (MPV)) were collected from Korea University Guro Hospital and confirmed by PCR using the AnyplexTM II RV16 detection kit (Seegene Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea). This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Guro Hospital (approval number: 2019GR0055).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Diagnostic Tests for Pneumonia Etiology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbiological analysis for the etiological diagnosis of pneumonia included blood-culture (BD BACTEC™ blood culture systems), urine antigen test for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila detection (Sofia FIA® Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA), and qRT-PCR targeting viral respiratory pathogens (Allplex™ Respiratory Panels 1, 2 and 3, Seegene, South Korea). For other less frequent bacterial pathogens causing pneumonia (Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae) a PCR of a pharyngeal swab was performed according to manufactures instructions (CerTest Biotec SL, Spain).
In patients with diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 had been commonly done some days before admission using commercial RT-PCR (Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assay, Seegene, South Korea) on nasopharyngeal swabs. Alpha (lineage B.1.1.7) was the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant present when samples of these patients were collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis in Healthcare Workers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was performed on nasopharyngeal swabs from HCWs by means of the Allplex SARS‐CoV‐2 Assay (Seegene Inc.; Seoul, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) targets E, RdRp/S and N genes and runs on the CFX96 instrument (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, USA) in accordance with an extraction‐free method.22 (link) The amplification of two viral targets with cycle threshold (Ct) value <40 defines a positive result. As recommended by the CDC, COVID-19 testing was carried out on HCWs with suspected respiratory symptoms, exposure to COVID-19 without symptoms, before contact with a subject with comorbidities, who could be exposed to severe COVID-19 disease and for screening program based on hospital affiliation.2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Automated SARS-CoV-2 RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral RNA was extracted by magnetic beads using the Extracta viral RNA kit in an automatic extractor (Extracta 32, Loccus do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil), following the manufacturer's recommendations. Immediately afterward, the samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR on the QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). During the study period, the following 3 kits were used for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by hydrolysis probes: Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Seegene), SARS-CoV-2 EDx (Bio-Manguinhos, FIOCRUZ), and the BIOMOL OneStep/COVID-19 kit (Instituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná - IBMP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Evaluation of COVID-19 RT-qPCR Kits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acid extract from the 100 selected samples were investigated by four commercially available COVID-19 RT-qPCR kits: TaqMan 2019nCoV Assay (Thermofisher. Spain), Allplex™SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Seegene. Werfern, Spain), FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Siemens. Spain), qCOVID-19 (Genómica. Spain). All the assays were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Rapid RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, two rapid nucleic acid extraction reagents were used: Pi-Lise Nucleic Acid Extraction Reagent, by Pi-Biotech Genética Avançada Ltda (Santos Dumont, MG, Brazil), and QuickExtractTM DNA Extraction Solution, by Lucigen Corporation (Middleton, WI, USA). Once thawed, aliquots were stored at −20 °C to avoid >3 freeze–thaw cycles.
To perform the RT-qPCR assays, a multiplex kit (Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay, by Seegene Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea), and a singleplex set of reagents [iTaq Universal Probes One-Step Kit, by Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA),were used, together with primers and controls 2019-nCoV RUO by IDT Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA)]. The analyses were run in two distinct equipment: QuantStudio 3 and 7500Fast Real-Time PCR Systems, by Applied Biosystems (Foster, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SARS-CoV-2 Detection Using Commercial Kits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All swab samples underwent nucleic acid extraction and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 with commercial extraction and diagnostic kits routinely used in each site. All kits have received approval from the Medical Device Authority, Malaysia. For extraction, KLGH, HT and SH used RNA Isolation Kit with the KingFisher Duo Prime Purification System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), Viral RNA Isolation Kit with the Liferiver EX3600 (Liferiver Biotech, China), QIAsymphony DSP Virus/Pathogen Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), and/or the Magcore Plus II Viral Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit (RBS Bioscience, Taiwan); PCR was performed with Real-Q 2019-nCoV Detection Kit (BioSewoom, South Korea), LyteStar 2019-nCoV RT-PCR Kit (ADT Biotech, Malaysia) and Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Seegene, South Korea). UMMC used either the GENTi Advanced DNA/RNA Extraction Kit (GeneAll, Korea) and Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay or the fully automated cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test on the cobas 6,800 system (Roche, USA). In addition, samples were tested for influenza A and B viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) using the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV kits and GeneXpert rapid real-time PCR system (Cepheid, USA). Assays were performed and results were analyzed following manufacturers’ instructions. All PCR tests were performed within 48 h of sample collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!