The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

114 protocols using eukitt

1

Quantification of LRP-1 in Neutrophils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neutrophil suspensions (1 × 106/mL) were cytospun on culture glass slides positively charged. Then slides were fixed in cold methanol and staining was performed after quenching of endogenous peroxidase with 3% H2O2 in methanol. Slides were incubated with primary antibody overnight, followed by incubation with biotinylated antibody for 30 min. Each sample was analyzed for the detection of LRP-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and a labelled polymer HRP anti-mouse from Dako was used as secondary antibody. Staining was completed using the streptavidin-peroxidase method and DAB (3,3′-Diaminobenzidine) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) [34 (link)]. Cytospins were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted in Eukitt (Merck Group, Darmstadt, Germany), examined by light microscopy (Leica, Cambridge, UK), and evaluated by image analysis (Leica Q500 MC Image Analysis System, Leica). Isotype-matched IgG monoclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was tested as a negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of RXRα and PPARγ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining for RXRα and PPARγ was previously described [14 (link),15 (link)]. Briefly, sections were first cut and prepared from paraffin-embedded BC samples using standard protocols, followed by incubation in blocking solution (ZytoChem Plus HRP Polymer System Kit, ZYTOMED Systems GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Hereafter incubation with primary antibodies against RXRα [14 (link)] (PP-K8508-00, Perseus Proteomics Inc., Tokyo, Japan) or PPARγ [15 (link)] (ab59256, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) with a 1:100 dilution for 16 h at 4 °C was performed. Following incubation with a biotinylated secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody and the associated avidin-biotin-peroxidase-complex (both Vectastain Elite ABC Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), visualization was performed with 3,3-diamino-benzidine (DAB; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Counterstaining of sections with acidic hematoxylin and immediately mounting with Eukitt (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was followed by manual analysis with a Diaplan light microscope (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany) with 25× magnification (see Supplementary Table S1 for precise protocols). A digital CCD camera system (JVC, Tokyo, Japan) was used for obtaining pictures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Heart Valve Leaflets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaflets were fixed in 4% Formalin (Huberlab, Aesch, Switzerland) for four hours before being embedded in paraffin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). For the overall tissue analysis, 5 µm sections of the samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for a general overview, as well as Movat’s pentachrome and Elastica van Gieson staining to visualize the multiple layers of heart valve leaflets. In addition, a CD90 antibody staining was performed to confirm recolonization of the decellularized tissue.
Before staining, the sections underwent a deparaffination and rehydration process starting with Roticlear (Roth, Germany), followed by a descending ethanol (Huberlab, Switzerland) series, and a final step in ddH2O. After staining, the same steps were taken in reverse to dehydrate the samples. All the sections were mounted in Eukitt (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histochemical Fiber-type Identification in Skeletal Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histochemical staining (COX/SDH), muscle cross sections on glass slides were incubated in COX medium (100 μM cytochrome c, 4 mM diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, and 20 μg/mL catalase in 0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) for 90 min at 37 °C. Sections were then washed in standard PBS, pH 7.4 (2 × 5 min), and incubated in SDH medium (130 mM sodium succinate, 200 μM phenazine methosulphate, 1 mM sodium azide, 1.5 mM nitro blue tetrazolium in 0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) for 120 min at 37 °C. Finally, they were washed in PBS, pH 7.4 (2 × 5 min), rinsed in distilled water, and dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series up to 100%, prior to incubation in xylene and mounting in Eukitt (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA). For skeletal muscle fiber-type identification, antibodies against different myosin heavy chain isoforms were used. Anti-myosin heavy chain ‘slow’ antibody was used to identify the MyH7 isoform in type I fibers (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA)). For type IIa fibers, we used myosin A4.74 antibody (obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, developed by Helen M. Blau, The University of Iowa). For sequential staining we used a diaminobenzidine staining kit as well as an alkaline phosphatase staining kit (both from Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Imaging Protocol for Nanoparticle Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MG63 cells were seeded on UV-sterilized coverslips laid at the bottom of 6-well plates (1.5 × 105 cells per well); after 24 h (50% ≤ confluence ≤ 70%), cells were treated with the GNp, GN1p, GN2p and CS powders. After treatments, the medium was removed and coverslips were washed twice with D-PBS, afterward cells on coverslips were fixed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) in D-PBS. The day after, a standard hematoxylin/eosin (HE) staining protocol was performed as follows: (1) D-PBS washing (3×, 10 min each); (2) washing (1×) with distilled water for 5 min; (3) hematoxylin staining for 15 min and quick washing with distilled water (1×); washing with running water for 15 min; (4) rapid washing with distilled water and staining by eosin (acidified with glacial acetic acid) for 1 min; (5) after washing with distilled water, dehydration by increasing concentrations of ethanol in alcohol/distilled water solutions (50%, 70%, 95% and 100% v/v, 2 min each); (6) rapid immersion in xylene (2 min) and (7) mounting on microscope slides with the Eukitt® (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) acrylic resin mix and 12–18 h drying before final image acquisition. Bright/fluorescence images of samples were acquired with a Nikon AZ-100 stereoscopy system equipped with the Nikon (Miniato, Japan) NIS-Elements D package software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluoro-Jade B Staining of Neurodegeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde dissolved in 0.1 phosphate buffer, pH 7.3 24 hours after the first KA injection, post-fixed overnight in the same fixative, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose. 30 μm-thick coronal brain sections were obtained in a freezing microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections containing dorsal hippocampus (Bregma = −1.2 to −1.990 ) were rinsed for 2 h in 0.1 M Tris, pH 7.4, mounted and air dried at room temperature overnight. The next day, sections were pre-treated for 3 min in absolute ethanol, followed by 1 min in 70% ethanol and 1 min in distilled water. They were then oxidized in a solution of 0.06% KMnO4 for 15 min. After three rinses of 1 min each in distilled water, the sections were incubated for 30 min in a solution of 0.001% Fluoro-Jade B (Chemicon) containing 0.01% of DAPI (Sigma) in 0.1% acetic acid. The slides were rinsed in deionized water for 3 min each, dried overnight, cleared in xylene, cover-slipped with Eukitt (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and examined using an Olympus (Hamburg, Germany) BX61 epifluorescence microscope. The statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed using Bonferroni post hoc test (Multiple comparison test) using Prism 5.0c (Mac OsX, Grahpad). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). A value of ***P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tissue Staining and Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetic ethanol- or PFA-fixed paraffin sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated using a xylene/ethanol gradient, stained with haematoxylin (#3870, JT Baker®, Phillipsburg, NJ) and eosin-Y alcoholic (#102439, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Sirius Red (Direct Red 80, #365548, Sigma), or using the Herovici procedure [16 (link)], and mounted with Eukitt® (#03989, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histological Analysis of Mouse Testis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly excised testes were cut and fixed in Japanese fixator (3% paraformaldehyde, 2% sodium cacodylate, and 0.2% picric acid), then rinsed three times (5 min per wash) in sodium cacodylate, and finally dehydrated in two acetone baths (30 min each). Samples were impregnated overnight at 4°C in glycolmethacrylate (GMA) and then embedded in resin (GMA and aniline/propanol solution) at 4°C until complete polymerization.
Nonadjacent 3-µm-thick sections of resin-fixed testes were prepared using a microtome (Leica RM 2065). The sections were placed on slides (Superfrost Plus, Thermo Scientific), stained with Masson Trichrome stain, dried, and mounted with an appropriate mounting medium (Eukitt®: Sigma, France). Since the mouse testis is a homogenous organ, we considered each section as representative of the whole testis. Observations were performed with an optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i) coupled with a digital-sight Nikon camera and a series of microscope objectives (×10, ×40, ×60). The samples were randomly and blindly observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Detection of Kisspeptin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were first processed for antigen retrieval by placing them in citrate buffer (0.1 M citric acid; 0.1 M trisodium citrate, pH 6.0) in a microwave (5 min, 700 W). Next, the sections were incubated sequentially in 5% normal donkey serum (1 h) in TBST, and 2ϫ overnight at 4°C in a sheep polyclonal antikisspeptin antibody (GQ2; 1:50 000; kindly provided by Dr Stephen Bloom [Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom]). They were then incubated for 1 hour in a donkey antisheep biotinylated antibody (Dako; 1:1000 in TBST) followed by 1 hour in ABC (1:800). Finally, the sections were incubated in nickel-3,3-diaminobenzidine solution, rinsed in distilled water, dehydrated, cleared in xylene, and coverslipped with Eukitt (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative TUNEL Assay for Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Apoptosis detection was conducted via TUNEL assay kit, following the instructions. Briefly, the paraffin-embedded tissues used for TUNEL assay were sliced into 4-μm-thick sections and then dewaxed in xylene. After infiltration in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min, sections were placed in TUNEL reaction mixture for 0.5 h and treated with converter-POD solution for 1 h. Sequentially, 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetra-hydrochloride (DAB) and hematoxylin dye were applied to stain and visualize the slides. TUNEL staining was performed on five consecutive sections for one specimen. After processing and dehydration, the slides were mounted with Eukitt (Sigma-Aldrich) and observed under a light microscope (OLYMPUS 1 × 70-SIF2, Japan). Cells with brownish-yellow particles in nuclei were considered as apoptotic cells. The total number of TUNEL-positive staining cells in the hippocampal CA1 region was calculated in three randomly selected views from each section and five sections per sample under a light microscope with 400 × magnification. Apoptosis index was acquired via the following formula: apoptosis index (AI) = the number of apoptotic cells/the number of total cells × 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!