The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Acclaim pepmap

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Acclaim PepMap is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of peptides. It features a silica-based stationary phase with a range of particle sizes and pore sizes to suit various peptide separation applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

38 protocols using acclaim pepmap

1

Reversed-Phase Chromatography for Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were separated by online reversed-phase chromatography using a Thermo Scientific Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 system equipped with a pre-column (Acclaim Pepmap, 75 µm ID × 2 cm, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and a C18 packed-tip column (Acclaim Pepmap, 75 µm ID × 50 cm, Thermo Scientific, Waltham MA, USA). Peptides were separated using a gradient of ACN (5–35% for 120 min) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The LC eluent was electrosprayed directly from the analytical column and a voltage of 1.7 kV was applied via the liquid junction of the nanospray source. The chromatography system was coupled to a Thermo Scientific Q-exactive mass spectrometer programmed to acquire in a data-dependent mode Top 10 most intense ion method. The survey scans were done at a resolving power of 70,000 FWHM (m/z 400), in positive mode and using an AGC target of 3e6. Default charge state was set at 2, unassigned and 1 charge states were rejected and dynamic exclusion was enabled for 25 s. The scan range was set to 300–1600 m/z. For ddMS2, the scan range was between 200 and 2000 m/z, 1 microscan was acquired at 17,500 FWHM and an isolation window of 4.0 m/z was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano-HPLC-MS/MS Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated. Acetonitrile and water for HPLC-MS/MS and sample preparation were HPLC quality and were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). Formic acid was supra-pure (90–100%) purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) while trypsin sequencing grade was purchased from Promega (Southampton, UK). All HPLC-MS connector fittings were either purchased from Upchurch Scientific (Hichrom) or Valco (RESTEK). Fifty micrograms of PSD proteins were acetone precipitated, protein pellets reconstituted in SDS-PAGE loading buffer, and briefly run on a 4–12% Bis-Tris gradient gel (Invitrogen) for ~10 min. Proteins were in-gel digested using a method similar to that of Shevchenko et al. (2006) [28 (link)]. Resulting peptide extracts were then acidified with 7 µL 0.05% TFA and were filtered with a Millex filter (Millipore) before HPLC-MS analysis. Nano-HPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed using an on-line system consisting of a nano-pump (Dionex Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher) coupled to a QExactive instrument (Thermo Fisher) with a pre-column of 300 µm × 5 mm (Acclaim Pepmap, 5 µm particle size) connected to a column of 75 µm × 50 cm (Acclaim Pepmap, 3 µm particle size). Samples were analyzed on a 90-min gradient in data-dependent analysis (one survey scan at 70 k resolution followed by the top ten MS/MS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis of Trypanosoma brucei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were run on a pre-cast Bolt™ 4-12% Bis-Tris Plus gel (Invitrogen) for 5 min before overnight in-gel trypsin digestion. Peptide extracts were dried by Speedvac and the dried peptide samples were re-suspended in MS-loading buffer (0.05% trifluoroacetic acid in water) then filtered using a Millex filter before HPLC-MS analysis. The analysis was performed using an online system of a nano-HPLC (Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC, Thermo-Fisher) coupled to a QExactive mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher) with a 300 µm × 5 mm pre-column (Acclaim Pepmap, 5 µm particle size) joined with a 75 µm × 50 cm column (Acclaim Pepmap, 3 µm particle size). Peptides were separated using a multi-step gradient of 2–98% buffer B (80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min over 90 min. Raw data from MS/MS spectra were searched against a T. brucei database using MASCOT (version 2.4). The parameters used in each search were: (i) missed cut = 2, (ii) fixed cysteine carbamidomethylation modification, (iii) variable methionine oxidation modification, (iv) peptide mass tolerance of 10 ppm, (v) fragment mass tolerance of 0.05 Da. Search results were exported using a significance threshold (p value) of less than 0.05 and a peptide score cut off of 20.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Peptide Sample Preparation for HPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried peptide samples were re-suspended in resuspension buffer (0.05%v/v trifluoroacetic acid in water) to a final concentration of 1 μg/μl. These samples were filtered using a Millex filter before subjecting to HPLC-MS analysis. Nano-HPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed using an on-line system consisting of a nano-pump (Dionex Ultimate 3000, Thermo-Fisher, UK) coupled to a QExactive instrument (Thermo-Fisher, UK) with a pre-column of 300 μm x 5 mm (Acclaim Pepmap, 5 μm particle size) connected to a column of 75 μm x 50 cm (Acclaim Pepmap, 3 μm particle size). Samples were analyzed on a 90 min gradient in data dependent analysis (1 survey scan at 70k resolution followed by the top 10 MS/MS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nano-LC-MS/MS was performed on an LTQ-Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC (both Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, peptides were preconcentrated on a C18 trapping column (Acclaim PepMap, 100 μm × 2 cm, 5 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 0.1% TFA and separated on a C18 main column (Acclaim PepMap, 75 μm × 50 cm, 2 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a binary gradient (solvent A: 0.1% formic acid (FA); solvent B: 0.1% FA, 84% ACN) ranging from 3 to 42% B in 185 min, at a flow rate of 250 nL min−1. MS survey scans were acquired in the Orbitrap from 300 to 2000 m/z at a resolution of 60,000 using the polysiloxane m/z 371.1012 as a lock mass. The 20 most intense signals above an intensity threshold of 104 and with charge states 2–5 were subjected to collision induced dissociation in the ion trap with a normalized collision energy of 35%, taking into account a dynamic exclusion of 10 s. Automatic gain control (AGC) target values and maximum injection times were set to 106 and 50 ms for MS and 104 and 100 ms for MS2 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detailed Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry was performed and analysed as previously described [34 (link)]. High performance liquid chromatography was conducted using a 2 cm pre-column (Acclaim PepMap 50 mm × 100 um inner diameter (ID)), and 50 cm analytical column (Acclaim PepMap, 500 mm × 75 um diameter; C18; 2 um; 100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), running a 120 min reversed-phase buffer gradient at 225 nl/min on a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 pump in-line with a Thermo Q-Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. A parent ion scan was performed using a resolving power of 60,000, then up to the twenty most intense peaks were selected for MS/MS (minimum ion count of 1,000 for activation) using higher energy collision induced dissociation (HCD) fragmentation. Dynamic exclusion was activated such that MS/MS of the same m/z (within a range of 10 ppm; exclusion list size = 500) detected twice within 5 s were excluded from analysis for 15 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analysed with a nano-LC (Ultimate RSLC Nano, Thermo Scientific) equipped with a C18 trap column (PepMap Acclaim 300 µm mm * 5 mm, Thermo Scientific), and a C18 separation column (PepMap Acclaim 75 µm * 500 mm, Thermo Scientific), coupled to a Fusion Tribrid Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific), fitted with an Easy Spray ion source. Loading buffer was 0.05% TFA; Buffer A was 0.1% FA; and Buffer B was 84% ACN, 0.1% FA. The following gradient was used: 0 min, B 0%; 50 min, B 55%; 60 min, B 100%. The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive ion mode. A full Orbitrap MS scan (R = 120 k, AGC target = Standard, max injection time = 50 ms) was followed by data dependent Orbitrap MS/MS scans (isolation window = 1.5, activation type = HCD, R = 50 k, AGC target = 300%, max. injection time = 90 ms) with 3 s cycle time. For SPS-MS3, the following parameters were used: a full Orbitrap MS scan (R = 120 k, AGC target = standard, max injection time = 50 ms) was acquired, followed by Ion Trap MS/MS scans (isolation window = 0.7, activation type = CID, AGC target = Standard, max. injection time = 50 ms) and Orbitrap MS3 scans (MS2 isolation window (m/z) = 2, number of SPS precursors: 5, Activation type = HCD, AGC target = 200%, max. injection time = 105 ms).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Reversed-Phase Chromatography for Peptide Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An online reversed-phase chromatography was used to separate the sample, through a Thermo Scientific Proxeon easy nLC1000 equipped with a Proxeon trap column (100 μm ID x 2 cm, Thermo Scientific) and a C18 packed-tip column (Acclaim PepMap, 75 µm ID x 15 cm, Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated with an increasing amount of ACN (2%-40% over 60 min) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The peptides were electrosprayed directly from the analytical column and a voltage of 1.7 kV was applied via the liquid junction of the nanospray source. The chromatography system was coupled to the mass spectrometer Thermo Scientific Q-exactive programmed with a top 10 data-dependent mode for all the samples. The resolving power was 70,000 FWHM (m/z 400), in a positive mode and using an AGC target of 3e6. Default charge state was set at 2, unassigned and +1 charge states were rejected and dynamic exclusion was enabled for 25 s. The scan range was set to 300-1600 m/z. For ddMS², the scan range was between 200 and 2000 m/z, 1 microscan was acquired at 17,500 FWHM and an isolation window of 4.0 m/z was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Peptide Fractionation and MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pooled TMT-labeled peptides were separated on a 150 mm, 300 μm OD, 2 μm C18, Acclaim PepMap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) column using an Ultimate 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The column was maintained at 30°C. Separation was performed with a flow of 4 μl using a segmented gradient of buffer B from 1–50% for 85 min and 50–95% for 20 min. Buffer A was 5% acetonitrile 0.01 M ammonium bicarbonate, buffer B was 80% acetonitrile 0.01 M ammonium bicarbonate. Fractions were collected every 150 s and combined into nine fractions by pooling every ninth fraction. Pooled fractions were dried in Concentrator plus (Eppendorf), and resuspended in 5 μl 0.1% formic acid, from which 2 μl were analyzed by LC-MS/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tandem Mass Spectrometry Protocol for Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All liquid chromatography with tandem MS (MS/MS) analyses were conducted using an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Dionex) coupled with a Q-Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as previously described, with some modifications (17 ). Peptides were separated on a two-column system equipped with a trap column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Acclaim PepMap, C18 5 μm, 100 Å, 300 μm I.D. × 5 mm) and an analytical column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, EASY-Spray column, C18 1.9 μm, 100 Å, 75 μm I.D. × 50 cm) using 90-min gradients from 7% to 30% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. Column temperature was maintained at 60 °C using a column heater. MaxQuant.Live version 1.2 was used for BoxCar acquisition (18 ). The MS1 resolution was set to 120,000 at m/z 200 for BoxCar, and the acquisition cycle comprised two BoxCar scans at 12 boxes (scaled width, 1 Th overlap) with a maximum ion injection time of 20.8 per box, with the individual AGC target set to 250,000. MS/MS spectra were acquired at a higher-energy collisional dissociation-normalized collision energy of 30, with a resolution of 17,500 at m/z 200. The maximum ion injection durations for the full and MS/MS scans were 20 ms and 100 ms, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!