The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 19.0 statistical software for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 19.0 is a statistical software package for Windows that provides advanced analytical capabilities. It is designed to help users analyze and understand data through a wide range of statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing. The software offers a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of tools to support data management, visualization, and reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using spss 19.0 statistical software for windows

1

Diagnostic Value of Radiological Examinations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY) and Excel 2016 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA). Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables were expressed as frequencies. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden’s index and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to indicate the diagnostic value of the different kinds of radiological examinations. Cochran’s Q tests were used to identify the differences in sensitivities between groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to identify the differences in continuous variables between the groups. The chi-square test was performed for categorical variables. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Bacteriological Detection Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY) and Excel 2016 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA). Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables are expressed as frequencies. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden’s index, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated to indicate the diagnostic value of the different bacteriological detection methods. Chi-square tests and McNemar tests were used to identify the differences in these parameters between the groups. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Identifying Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Excel 2016 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA) and SPSS 19.0 statistical software for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) were used for the statistical analyses. Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies. Student's t test was performed if the data followed a normal distribution. Otherwise, the Mann–Whitney U test was performed for comparisons between continuous variables. The chi‐square test was performed for comparisons between categorical variables. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to identify the potential risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures. A stepwise regression method was used. A P‐value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analysis of mNGS and Bacterial Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation [SD], while the categorical variables were presented as count (proportion) when appropriate. Sensitivity, total sensitivity, misdiagnosis rate, and diagnosis time were compared between mNGS and bacterial culture on different samples by applying Pearson’s chi-squared test, McNemar test and paired t-test as appropriate. Logistic regression was used for analyzing the factors which may influence the positive result of blood mNGS. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. The above statistical analyses were conducted by using SPSS 19.0 statistical software for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY) and Excel 2022 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Denosumab Treatment Effect Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY) and Excel 2016 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation). Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables are expressed as frequencies. Student's t‐test was performed if the data followed a normal distribution. Otherwise, the Mann–Whitney U test was performed for comparisons between continuous variables. Chi‐square tests were used to identify the differences between the categorical variables. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to identify the factors associated with the treatment effect of denosumab (only patients in the denosumab group were included in this regression analysis). For continuous variables, receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn, and the cut‐off points were selected by Youden's index. A stepwise regression method was used. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for each independent factor. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of ROC Curves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 19.0 statistical software for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed, and area under curve (AUC) values were compared between groups; the Chi-squared test was used to determine statistical significance between groups (p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All results are presented as mean ± SD. Differences between experimental groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Behavioral Analysis using Observer XT-9.0

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frequencies of the behaviours (rate/minute) were calculated using the Observer XT-9.0 system (Noldus Information Technology, 2009) and then subjected to further statistical analysis. Repeated Analysis of Variances (ANOVAs) were conducted using SPSS 19.0 for Windows statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL), and a p < .05 was accepted as significant throughout. When Mauchley’s test indicated a violation of the assumption of sphericity, degrees of freedom were corrected using Greenhouse-Geisser sphericity estimates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 19.0 for Windows statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Data are presented as mean ± SD. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test data normality. Statistical analysis used parametric one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey Multiple Comparison test and unpaired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative PCR Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA) and least significant difference multiple comparison tests (P< 0.05) using SPSS 19.0 for Windows statistical software (SPSS., Chicago, IL, USA). The qPCR data were analyzed using the 2 -ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!