The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using clone 6f2

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unstained 3-μm-thick slides of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were obtained and submitted for immunostaining with an automated stainer (Dako Omnis, Glostrup, Denmark). The following primary antibodies were used: CD56 (pre-diluted, clone 123C3, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) (1:200, clone 6F2, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), Olig2 (1:500, clone OLIG2, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, USA), vimentin (1:800, clone V9, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), neurofilament (1:100, clone NF70, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), NeuN (1:1000, clone A60, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, USA), synaptophysin (1:150, clone Synap, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), EMA (1:200, clone GM008, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CK18 (1:200, clone 6F2, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), smooth muscle actin (1:4000, clone 1A4, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), NFκB (1:6000, clone D14E12, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA), L1CAM (1:500, clone UJ127.11, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, USA), and Ki-67 (1:200, clone MIB-1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Reticulin staining was performed using the Reticulin silver plating kit according to Gordon & Sweets (Merck Millipore, Guyancourt, France). External positive and negative controls were used for all antibodies and staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Profiling of SARS-CoV-2 in Frontal Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) samples from the superior frontal gyrus (Brodman area 9 or 8) were processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin following standard laboratory procedures. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies to human glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; 1:200, clone 6F2; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), human leukocyte antigen DR, (HLA-DR, DP, DQ; 1:200, mouse clone CR3/43; DakoCytomation), CD8 (1:100, clone SP239; Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, USA), and SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (1:1000; clone 4A8, Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany) was performed on a Ventana benchmark XT autostainer following the manufacturer's recommendations. The quality of the immunohistochemical stains was assessed by on-slide positive controls for all antibodies. For semiquantitative assessment of cytotoxic T lymphocyte infiltration, cells with positive CD8 staining were counted per high-power field (HPF) of 0.5 mm2. Infiltration was categorized as none, mild (1 to 9 cells per HPF), moderate (10 to 49 cells per HPF), or severe (≥50 cells per HPF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dual Immunofluorescence Profiling of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Double immunofluorescence stainings were carried out manually on selected tumour specimens using antibodies against Sox9 and β-catenin, Olig2 or GFAP (monoclonal mouse anti GFAP; 1:500; clone 6F2; Dako; Glostrup, Denmark) as well as Sox2 and Olig2 or GFAP. After dewaxing the slides, antigen retrieval by microwave pre-treatment was performed in citrate-buffer at pH 6. To prevent unspecific antibody binding, the slides then were incubated for two hours with a blocking solution containing PBS with foetal calf serum (5%; Biochrom AG; Berlin, Germany), goat serum (3%; Millipore; Temecula, CA, USA) and Triton ×100 (0,1%; Sigma-Aldrich; Steinheim, Germany). Primary antibodies were diluted in the blocking solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Carbocyanine 2 (Cy2) goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit (1:100; green; Dianova; Hamburg, Germany) and Cy-3 goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (1:100; red; Dianova; Hamburg, Germany) served as fluorescent markers, while cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma Aldrich; Steinheim, Germany) at a concentration of 500 ng/ml for 5 min at room temperature. Slides were analysed using an Olympus BX-51 fluorescent microscope (Olympus; Hamburg, Germany) equipped with an F-View II CCD camera (Soft imaging systems; Stuttgart, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unstained 3-μm-thick slides of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues were obtained and submitted for immunostaining using an automated stainer (Dako Omnis, Glostrup, Denmark). The following primary antibodies were used: Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) (1:200, clone 6F2, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), Olig2 (1:500, clone OLIG2, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, USA), SOX10 (1:50, clone A-2, Diagomics, Blagnac, France), neurofilament (1:100, clone NF70, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), NeuN (1:1000, clone A60, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, USA), synaptophysin (1:150, clone Synap, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), chromogranin A (1:200, clone LK2 H10, Diagnostic Biosystem, Pleasanton, USA), EMA (1:200, clone GM008, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), L1CAM (1:500, clone UJ127.11, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, USA), NFκB (1:6000, clone D14E12, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA), H3K27me3 (1:2500, polyclonal, Diagenode, Liege, Belgium), and Ki-67 (1:200, clone MIB-1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). External positive and negative controls were used for all antibodies and staining. MIB-1 labeling index was jointly estimated by two neuropathologists in a hot-spot area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Gliomas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The central pathology review was performed conjointly by two neuropathologists (ATE and PV). According to the last WHO classification, no grading was applied. A representative paraffin block was selected for each case. Unstained 3-μm-thick slides of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were obtained and submitted for immunostaining. The following primary antibodies were used: Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) (1:200, clone 6F2, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), epithelial membrane antigen (1:200, clone GM008, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), Olig2 (1:3000, clone C-17, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA), Neurofilament Protein (1:100, clone 2F 11, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), H3K27Me3 (1:2500, polyclonal, Diagenode, Liege, Belgium), EZHIP (1:75, polyclonal, Sigma-Aldrich, Bromma, Sweden) and H3K27M (1:5000, clone EPR18340, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). External positive and negative controls were used for all antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Central Pathology Review of Soft Tissue Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The central pathology review was performed conjointly by 3 neuropathologists (ATE, PV, EL), a pathologist expert in soft tissue tumors (FL), and a pathologist expert in vascular lesions (MW). For the CNS cases, additional immunohistochemical stainings were performed on paraffin-embedded sections including: CD34 (1:40, clone QBEnd10, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), smooth muscle actin (SMA) (1:1500, clone 1A4, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), Desmin (1:400, clone D33, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), h-caldesmon (1:100, clone h-CALD, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA), PS100 (1:6000, polyclonal, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), GFAP (1:200, clone 6F2, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), neurofilament (1:25, clone 2F11, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), STAT6 (1:200, clone YE361, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), SSTR2a (1:200, clone UMB1, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and EMA (1:200, clone GM008, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). All immunohistochemical stainings were performed in an automatic closed immunostainer (Omnis automate). Orcein staining was also performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!