The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using auriga microscope

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Degradation Layers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) measurements were conducted using an Auriga microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) device (Apollo XP from EDAX, Ametek GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany). The SEM images were obtained at an accelerating voltage of 2 kV with the SE2—detector. Cross sections of the SC and negative control samples (SNC) were prepared by ion beam milling at 30 keV using a gallium focused ion beam (FIB) attached to the Auriga. To prevent damage to the cells and the corrosion layer as well as to obtain a precise cut along the degradation layer, a layer of platinum was deposited on the surface by the Gas-Injection-System (GIS). Five EDX—line scans were performed directly after FIB milling at 15 keV to define the vertical element distribution of the degradation layer on the cross-sections. The EDX scans were conducted in 8 regions of interest in the respective EDX spectrum, i.e., carbon (C), nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), sodium (Na), Mg, phosphorus (P), sulphur (S) and calcium (Ca), complemented by the alloying elements of the respective sample, i.e., Ag and Gd. Each degradation layer cross section was analysed using this method. To obtain a high counting rate for the EDX analysis, the SEM aperture (120 μm diameter) was used in high-current mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of As-Synthesized Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure of the as-synthesized samples was determined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation (1.5417 Å) source, a LYNXEYE super speed detector and a Ni filter. X-ray diffraction data was collected in the 2θ range between 20° and 80° using a scan rate of 0.05° by 2 s. The light absorption properties were measured by using a UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 UV-Vis) with a wavelength range of 250–800 nm. A Zeiss Auriga microscope equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector was used to perform scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and EDX analysis.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) from SPECS system (Germany) was used to identify Mn and Fe oxidation states on the samples. The instrument was equipped with XR50 duel anode source (Al operated at 150 W) and a Phoibos MCD-9 detector. All measurements were done under the vacuum (pressure 5 × 10−9 mbar) and the hemispherical analyzer was set at the pass energy 25 eV while the high resolution spectra step size was set at 0.1 eV. Casa XPS program (Casa Software Ltd., UK) was used for the data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microscopic Morphological Analysis of Microplastics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM provides morphological images in the microscopic range through a beam of electrons that react with atoms on the surface of a sample, leading to the emission of electrons from the surface. While scanning the surface, variations in the signals of the backscattered electrons occur according to the surface topology, thus providing information on the sample surface morphology and composition [67 ]. This technique was used for MP shape characterization in Milli-Q water and synthetic seawater. For SEM analysis, MP and NP solutions with concentrations of 0.02 mg/mL (dispersed in Milli-Q water and synthetic seawater) were applied on a carbon-coated adhesive, dried at room temperature, and examined using a scanning electron microscope (Auriga microscope, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a 5 kV field and aperture size of 30 microns.
The experimental design and statistical analysis are shown in Appendix A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images were acquired using Zeiss microscope model Auriga microscope. The materials were dispersed on double side conduction tape on an aluminum support. The images were obtained with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV and different magnifications. X-ray diffractograms were obtained in a Siemens diffractometer model D500 using CuKα as X-ray source (λ = 0.154056 nm) at a generator voltage of 40 kV and a generator current of 17.5 mA. Magnetic properties were investigated by using an EZ9 MicroSense vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature with a magnetic field (H) cycled between −22 kOe and +22 kOe. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were acquired at liquid nitrogen boiling point, using a Tristar II 3020 Kr Micromeritics equipment. The samples were previously degassed at 60 °C, under vacuum, for 20 h. The specific surface areas were determined by the BET (Brunauer, Emmett and Teller) multipoint technique and the pore volume and pore size distribution were obtained by using the BJH (Barret, Joyner and Halenda) method [53 ]. Infrared spectra were acquired by using KBr supported disks (1%). The equipment used was a Shimadzu FTIR Prestigie 21. The spectra were obtained at room temperature with 4 cm−1 of resolution and 120 cumulative scans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Cell Growth on PLA Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown on PLA scaffolds with or without Rho1%-PAM coating were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.15 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 2 h at room temperature. After dehydration with an alcoholic gradient, samples were coated with chromium (30 nm) using a Quorum 150 T sputter. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) analysis was performed using a Zeiss Auriga microscope, operating at a low acceleration voltage and current in order to avoid beam damages of the cells (Fig. 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Lithium Titanate Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BET surface areas were determined by nitrogen physisorption using a TriStar II 3020 from Micromeritics. The samples were outgassed at 250 °C for 5 h before the measurement.
The morphology of the samples was examined by using a ZEISS Auriga microscope.
High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analyses were carried out with a field emission gun microscope FEI Tecnai F20, working at 200 kV and with a point-to-point resolution of 0.19 nm. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) spectra were obtained in a GATAN Quantum detector coupled to the F20 microscope.
X-ray power diffraction (XRD) analyses were carried out on a Bruker AXS D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer with CuKα1 radiation (λ=1.5406 Å).
The UV/Vis spectra were recorded in diffuse reflectance mode in a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV/Vis spectrometer equipped with a 150 mm Int. Sphere (PerkinElmer). BaSO4 was used as a reference material.
The chemical composition of the surface of the LTO was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a PHI instrument model 5773 Multitechnique with A1K radiation (1486.6 eV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microscope and Electrical Characterization of Organic Transistors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical microscope Leica DM 4000 M was used to analyze the printed layers. Electrical measurements were carried out in a semi-automatic Cascade Microtech Summit Series 12000 probe station using a semiconductor parameter analyzer Keithley 4200 and taking into account the IEEE 1620 standard for test methods for the characterization of organic transistors and materials41 (link). The probe station was adapted to work with the soft and flexible plastic substrate. Different smart characterization protocols were developed based on LabVIEW programs which perform a variety of electrical measurements in order to analyze the failure origins. Additionally, in-situ optical investigation was performed by capturing microscopic images of each of the TFTs during the process of electrical characterization. Profilometry measurements were carried out with a Veeco Dektak 150. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with a Zeiss Auriga microscope. The system is equipped with a focused ion beam (FIB) tool Zeiss 1560XB Cross Beam. FIB cuts were performed to obtain cross-sectional images of the layer stack in order to determine the thickness and the structure of the individual layers. The cuts were 150 μm long to avoid single point measurements in non-regular areas and were done in the center of the TFTs far away from the edge regions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microscopic Analysis of Oil-Glass Interface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM and cryo-SEM investigations were carried out on a Zeiss Auriga microscope operated at an accelerating voltage of 3 kV. The samples were sputter-coated with a 5 nm-thick iridium layer. White-light interferometry, an established non-contact surface profiling method30 , was carried out using a NewView 6200 white-light interferometer (ZygoLOT GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). The light reflection from the boundary between two materials with different refractive indexes is registered with the white-light interferometer. Because of the small difference in the refractive indexes, the reflection from the interface between oil (n=1.40) and the glass (n=1.47) is neglected compared with the reflection from the interface between oil and air (n=1.00).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-Resolution SEM Analysis of Glass Fiber Separators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the glass fiber separators was analyzed via high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM, AURIGA® microscope, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The sample surfaces were made conductive by using a turbo-pumped gold sputter/coater (Quorum Q150T, Quorum Technologies Ltd., Co., East Grinstead, UK). The current applied was 45 mA for 30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Imaging Carbon Structures Across Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbon structures and cells growing/differentiating on different substrates were imaged with a Carl Zeiss Auriga microscope. 3D-views of the CNG structures were captured at a tilting angle of 30°. Cells were fixed in 2% of glutaraldehyde diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution for 1-hour and were rinsed once with phosphate buffer (PB) for 15 mins and twice with PBS followed by one-time water rinsing for 15 mins. Samples were then dehydrated with a sequence of ethanol-water solutions ranging from 10% to 100% of ethanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!