The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using pierce ecl detection reagent

1

Western Blot Analysis of IRG1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected in 600 μL RIPA lysis buffer and stored at −80 °C before protein extraction. Samples were centrifuged at 10 000 g for 10 min at 4 °C and supernatants were harvested. Protein concentrations were measured with Bio‐Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate (500‐0006, Bio‐Rad, Temse, Belgium). Proteins were diluted in RIPA lysis and loading buffers. Heat‐denatured protein samples were separated on 4–12% BisTris‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (NP0322BOX, Invitrogen) followed by transfer to polyvinylidene flouride (PVDF) membranes 0.2 μm (LC2005, Invitrogen). After blocking with 5% (wt/vol) dry milk in TBS containing 0.1% triton (TBST), the membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary anti‐IRG1 antibody (Ab222411, Abcam) diluted 1 : 250 in 1% (wt/vol) BSA in TBST with constant shaking. After three washing steps with TBST, the membrane was incubated with anti‐rabbit antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase and revealed by chemoluminescence using Pierce™ ECL detection reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For the second hybridization, the membrane was incubated with anti‐actin antibody (MAB 1501, Millipore, Overijse, Belgium) for 90 min at RT in 1% (wt/vol) BSA in TBST with constant shaking. After three washing steps with TBST, the membrane was incubated with anti‐mouse antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase and revealed by chemoluminescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of STAT3 and Phospho-STAT3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heat‐denatured protein samples were separated on 4–12% BisTris–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by transfer to nitrocellulose membranes 0.2 μm (Bio‐Rad). After blocking with 5% (wt/vol) dry milk in TBST for STAT3 and 3% BSA in TBST for Phospho‐STAT3, respectively, the membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C in primary anti‐STAT3 antibody from mouse (Cell Signaling) diluted 1:1,000 in 5% (wt/vol) dry milk in TBST and in primary anti‐Phospho‐STAT3 antibody (Cell Signaling) diluted 1:500 in 3% BSA in TBST with constant shaking. After three washing steps with TBS containing 0.1% Tween‐20, the membrane was incubated with anti‐rabbit antibody or anti‐mouse respectively, coupled to horseradish peroxidase and revealed by chemoluminescence using the Pierce™ ECL detection reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot was performed as previously described (Tramullas et al., 2010 (link)). Whole-cell lysates were prepared from the lumbosacral region of the spinal cord and total protein was determined using the Quan-iT protein assay kit (Invitrogen, Ireland). Equal amounts of protein were subjected to electrophoresis on 4–12% gradient gels (NuPAGE, Invitrogen, Ireland) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio Rad, Ireland). Membranes were then incubated with goat anti-GFAP (1:1000; Sigma, Ireland), the astrocyte marker, rabbit anti-CD11b (1:500; Novus Biologicals, UK), a microglia activation marker; and mouse anti β-actin (1:15000; Sigma, Ireland). Immunoreactivity was detected with Pierce ECL detection reagent (Thermo Scientific, IL, USA) and visualized using a luminescent image analyzer (LAS-3000, Fujifilm, Ireland). The relative density of the immunoreactive bands was quantified using Fiji Is Just ImageJ (FIJI) software (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)) and normalized to the relative density of mouse anti-β actin (Sigma, Ireland) for each sample. No significant differences were observed in the protein expression levels of β-Actin between groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of IFIT1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEFs were induced for 72 h as described above and then lysed in radio immunoprecipitation assay buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (2 (link)). Cell wall debris was cleared by centrifugation, and 20 ng of protein was electrophoresed on 5%/10% SDS polyacrylamide discontinuous gels. Gels were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) immunoblotting membrane by semidry transfer and blocked with 5% nonfat milk–Tris-buffered saline–0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) for 1 h. Anti-FLAG M2-peroxidase conjugate (1:2,000) was applied for 2 h at room temperature, or rabbit anti-mIfit1 (1:1,000) was applied overnight at 4°C with agitation. Secondary detection of IFIT1 was performed by thoroughly washing in TBS-T followed by goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (1:2,000) for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were thoroughly washed prior to detection with Pierce ECL detection reagent (Thermo Scientific) and exposure to chemiluminescence film (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of TLR4 and CD11b Expression in Mouse Brain and Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of 16 weeks, CRD-naïve mice were sacrificed without anesthesia and the dissected brains and spinal cords snap-frozen and stored at -80°C. Western blot was performed as previously described [31 (link)]. Whole-cell lysates were prepared from the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus and the lumbar region of the spinal cord and total protein was determined using the Quan-iT protein assay kit (Invitrogen, Ireland). Equal amounts of protein were subjected to electrophoresis on 4–12% gradient gels (NuPAGE, Invitrogen, Ireland) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio Rad, Ireland). Membranes were then incubated with rabbit anti-TLR4 (Abcam, Ireland) and rabbit anti-CD11b (Novus Biologicals, UK). Spleen lysates were used as a positive control for TLR4-antibody detection. Inmunoreactivity was detected with Pierce ECL detection reagent (Thermo Scientific, IL, USA) and visualized using a luminescent image analyzer (LAS-3000, Fugifilm, Ireland). Optical density of the immunoreactive bands was quantified using ImageJ software and normalized to mouse anti-β actin (Sigma, Ireland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Hippocampal MOG Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male C56BL/6J mice, 10–14 weeks old (N = 7 with n = 3 for SAH, n = 4 for Sham), were used for this set of experiments. Mouse bilateral whole hippocampus was homogenized in ice-cold RIPA buffer [25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1X HALT Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail Solutions (ThermoFisher Scientific)], centrifuged, and stored at −80°C until use. Proteins were quantified by Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and resolved by high resolution Nupage 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific-Invitrogen). Anti-rabbit MOG (1:1,000; #12690-1-AP, Proteintech) was incubated overnight and diluted in blocking buffer (5% dried milk in Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and 0.2% Tween-20, TBST). After no-stripping of the membrane, anti-rabbit GAPDH linked to HRP (1:2,000; #8884, Cell Signaling Technology) was incubated on the same membrane following MOG labeling overnight and diluted in blocking buffer. Detection was done with Pierce ECL detection reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific). Protein bands were detected with X-ray film (GenHunter.com), and densitometry was calculated after scanning the films at 600 dpi using ImageJ software and the Miller's tutorial (56 ). Results were expressed as percentage of change from Sham.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!