The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Strengthergo 8

Manufactured by Mitsubishi
Sourced in Japan

The StrengthErgo 8 is a laboratory equipment designed for measuring muscular strength and endurance. It features a range of adjustable settings to accommodate different user requirements. The device is capable of recording and analyzing data related to muscle performance.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using strengthergo 8

1

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CPX was performed 1–3 h after a meal, and the intake of caffeinated beverages was restricted 3 h before exercise. An incremental cycle exercise was performed in a quiet room maintained at a constant temperature (22 °C–24 °C). The patients performed the test in the upright position on an electronically braked ergometer (Strength Ergo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Company, Tokyo, Japan). At first, the patients rested for 2 min on the ergometer. Following the 2-min rest, the patients performed a 2-min warm-up, pedaling at 0 W and then exercised at a progressively increasing intensity until they could no longer maintain the pedaling rate (volitional exhaustion). The intensity was increased with a RAMP protocol ergometer (10–15 W/min), depending on the exercise capacity of each patient. After the exercise tests were terminated, the patients were instructed to stop pedaling and to stay on the ergometer for 3 min (recovery phase). Single-lead and 12-lead electrocardiograms were continuously recorded. Blood pressure was measured every minute with an indirect automatic manometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CPET was performed using a stationary bicycle (StrengthErgo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering, Tokyo) and a breath-by-breath gas analyzer (AE-300S; Minato Ikagaku Co., Tokyo). Exercise tests were conducted on 2 separate days (mean interval between the 1st- and 2nd-day tests: 4.1 ± 2.3 days). On day 1, symptomatic maximal exercise was performed using a ramp protocol of 10 W·min−1 (Inc-Ex) with GET determination. On day 2, Inc-Ex was performed using a ramp protocol of 10 W·min−1 up to the GET point, after which a constant load at the GET level work rate was initiated and maintained for a total exercise duration of approximately 25 minute (Fig. 1). Before the experiment, the total duration of the exercise (Inc-Ex + CL-Ex) on day 2 was planned to be 25 minute for each participant. The duration of Inc-Ex varied among participants because of the different GET levels. Consequently, the mean Inc-Ex duration was 3.2 ± 1.1 minute and the mean CL-Ex duration was 21.8 ± 1.1 minute. Thus, all graphs, tables, and texts denoting 25 minute of CL-Ex represent approximately 22 minute of CL-Ex. Warm-up exercises were performed for 2 minute at 10 W. We used 10-s average data for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CPET was performed using a stationary bicycle (StrengthErgo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering, Tokyo, Japan) and a breath-by-breath gas analyzer (AE-300S; Minato Ikagaku Co., Tokyo, Japan). Symptomatic maximal exercise was performed using a ramp protocol of 10 W/min (incremental exercise). After 2 min rest (sitting on the stationary bicycle), warm-up exercises were performed for 2 min at 10 W. We used 10-s average data for all analyses. The output was obtained using a gas analyzer system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed by using a stationary bicycle (StrengthErgo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering, Tokyo) and a breath-by-breath gas analyzer (AE-300S; Minato Ikagaku, Tokyo). Exercise tests were carried out on 2 separate days. Maximal exercise was performed by using a ramp protocol of 25 watt/min on day 1 (medium ramp), and submaximal exercise of 6 to 17 watt/min (slow ramp) was performed on day 2. The submaximal test was based on the day 1 test results and was designed to allow the individual participants to reach VT in approximately 10 minutes.
Each participant performed the tests in the afternoon at approximately the same time 1 week apart. The submaximal exercise duration was set to a total of 12 minutes. Ramp exercise was always preceded by a 2-minutes warm-up period at 20 watts during the maximal and 10 watts during the submaximal exercise protocol. The gas analyzer was calibrated for volume and O2 and CO2 concentrations before each test. For the gas data analysis, 10-second means from the gas analyzer system were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients performed the test in the upright position on an electronically braked ergometer (Strength Ergo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Company, Tokyo, Japan). At first, the patients rested for 2 min on the ergometer until their heart rate (HR) and respiratory condition slowed down. Following a 2-min rest (rest phase), the patients performed a 2-min warm-up pedaling at 0 W (warm-up phase). The intensity was increased with a RAMP protocol ergometer (10–15 W/min), depending on the exercise capacities of each patient (exercise phase). The patients exercised with a progressive intensity until they could no longer maintain the pedaling rate (volitional exhaustion). After the exercise tests were terminated, the patients were instructed to stop pedaling and to stay on the ergometer for 3 min (recovery phase). The blood pressure was measured every minute with an indirect automatic manometer. Single-lead and 12-lead electrocardiograms were continuously recorded during whole test from the beginning of the rest phase to the end of the recovery phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Incremental Exercise Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent incremental symptom‐limited exercise testing using an upright cycle ergometer (Strength Ergo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). In addition, CPX was performed using a ramp protocol, including a 2 min recovery after peak effort.2 All patients started with 2 min rest and 3 min warm‐up at 10 W, followed by a 10 W ramp. Then, we evaluated breath‐by‐breath VO2, carbon dioxide production, and minute ventilation using the gas analysis system (Cpex‐1; Inter‐Reha Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Of note, peak VO2 was defined as the highest VO2 observed during CPX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Stable Heart Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We included 534 patients with stable heart disease or patients who underwent simultaneous CPET and spirometry testing (age: 67.0 ± 12.9 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 65.9–68.1], height:161.9 ± 9.2 cm [95% CI: 161.2–162.7], body weight:62.5 ± 14.6 kg [95% CI: 61.3–63.7], Body mass index (BMI): 23.7 ± 4.4 kg/m2 [95% CI: 23.3–24.1]) to scrutinize physical functions.
The CPET was conducted following guideline-based methods [38 (link)], using a stationary bicycle (StrengthErgo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering, Tokyo, COMBI 75XL3; Konami Sports Co., Ltd., Tokyo) and a breath-by-breath analysis with a gas analyzer (AE-300 S or AE-310 S; Minato Medical Science Co., Ltd., Tokyo). The maximal symptomatic exercise was performed using the ramp protocol. The exercise protocol consisted of 2–3 min of rest and 2–3 min of warm-up. The ramp protocol was adjusted to 10–20 W/min, assuming the individual exercise tolerance level. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) at the end of the exercise was assessed using the Borg scale.
Furthermore, a breath-by-breath gas analyzer (AE-300 S or AE-310 S; Minato Medical Science Co., Ltd., Tokyo) was used to measure the ventilatory volume of each breath using a hot-wire flowmeter [39 (link)]. Before each exercise testing, we calibrated it according to standard protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A symptom-limited cycle ergometer (Strength Ergo 8, Mitsubishi Electric Engineering, Japan) was used for CPET. Each patient wore a mask, and breath was analyzed using a gas analyzer (Cpex-1, Inter Reha; Japan); V˙O2 , expiratory tidal volume (VT), minute ventilation (VE), ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide ( V˙ E/ V˙ CO2), dead space to tidal volume ratio (VD/VT), and breathing frequency at rest and at peak exercise were evaluated. Oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and the electrocardiogram were measured during the test. In the exercise protocol, pre-exercise resting measurements were obtained within the steady state period for more than 3 min. Incremental testing was then started by increasing the load by 10 W per minute with a ramp-exercise protocol. The examination was continued until exhaustion or the predicted maximum heart rate or blood pressure was surpassed, and showing electrocardiographic changes such as ST segment depression of greater than 2 mm and a short run of premature ventricular contractions. Dyspnea intensity was evaluated by a 10-point modified Borg category-ratio scale at rest and every 1 min after initiation of the incremental load test. The data generated were measured breath-by-breath and as 30-s averages at rest and during exercise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed using a stationary bicycle (StrengthErgo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering, Tokyo, Japan) and a breath-by-breath gas analyzer (AE-300S; Minato Ikagaku Co., Tokyo, Japan). Symptomatic maximal exercise was performed using a ramp protocol of 5–30 watts (W)/min according to age and condition after 2–3 min rest and warm-up of 0–10 W lasting 2–3 min. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) at the end of the exercise was assessed using the Borg scale (Beaver et al., 1986a (link); Takano, 2000 (link); Dekerle et al., 2003 (link); Balady et al., 2010 (link); Lenti et al., 2011 (link); Wasserman et al., 2012 ; Yen et al., 2015 , 2018 (link); Nishijima et al., 2017 (link), 2019 (link); Keir et al., 2018 (link); Korkmaz Eryılmaz et al., 2018 (link); Carriere et al., 2019 (link); Iannetta et al., 2019 (link); Nakade et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed using a cycle ergometer (Strength Ergo 8; Mitsubishi Electric Engineering, Tokyo, Japan) according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines.17 One minute of upright rest was followed by 4 minutes of unloaded pedaling and progressive workload increments (5 or 10 W/min), until symptom‐limited maximum tolerance was reached. Oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and minute ventilation were measured continuously using breath‐by‐breath analysis (Cpex‐1; Inter‐Reha, Tokyo, Japan). Peak VO2 was defined as the average VO2 data collected during the last 30 seconds of peak exercise. Ventilatory efficiency during exercise was expressed as the slope of ventilation versus VCO2, over the linear component of the plot.18Respiratory function of FEV1, FVC, percentage of vital capacity (%VC), and the diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed using a spirometer (Autospirometer S21; Minato medical Co., Osaka, Japan), within ≈ 2 days following right heart catheterization. Arterial blood gas analyses for oxygen saturation, and arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and mixed venous oxygen saturation in the pulmonary artery were performed during right heart catheterization in room‐air conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!