The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using glp 21 ph meter

1

pH Determination of Seaweed Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid phases obtained by water extraction from red seaweed M. stellatus were studied, pH determination, previously calibrated, was carried out using a GLP 21 pH meter (Crison, Barcelona, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Soluble Solid and pH Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble solid content (°Bx) and pH were measured in all extracts by means of a refractometer and pH meter.
pH and temperature were determined by a CRISON (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain) GLP21 pH meter, a two-channel laboratory instrument.
A Brix and Gravity Refractometer with automatic temperature compensation (ATC) (with detection range of 0–32% Brix Grade and 1.000–1.130 for specific gravity, respectively) was used for specific gravity detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Determination of Ionogel Membrane Ion Exchange Capacity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One of the key factors influencing fuel cell performance is proton transport through the PEM, which may be measured by a parameter known as ion exchange capacity (IEC). To determine this parameter, ionogel membranes were completely immersed in a 1 M HCl solution for 24 h. Subsequently, the ionogel membranes were removed from the HCl solution, washed with deionized water until neutral pH was reached, and placed in a 2 M NaCl solution for 24 h for Na+ ions to replace H+ ions. Finally, the ionogel membranes were removed and the resulting solution was titrated with 0.075 M NaOH by measuring the pH variation with a GLP21 PH-meter (Crison Instruments S.A., Barcelona, Spain) until the equivalence point was reached, determined by taking the first and second derivatives of the pH variation versus the volume of the titrating solution. The IEC values of ionogel membranes were calculated using the following equation: IEC (mmolg)=VNaOH×CNaOHWdry
where VNaOH is the volume of the titrant solution (L), CNaOH (mmol/L) is the concentration of the titrant solution, titrated with a standard solution of oxalic acid, and Wdry is the dry weight of the ionogel membrane (g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Hydrolysate pH and Browning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH levels of protein hydrolysates were read at room temperature using a GLP 21 pH meter (Crison Instruments S.A., Barcelona, España). Technical buffer solutions of pH 4.00, 7.00, and 10.00 were used to calibrate the equipment before the measurements.
The browning intensity of protein hydrolysates were determined following a method described by Laroque et al. [22 (link)] with some modifications. Briefly, protein hydrolysates were diluted 10 times using distilled water, and the absorbance was measured at 420 nm using a Jasco V-750 spectrophotometer (Madrid, España).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Spectroscopic Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence spectra were measured using a Shimadzu (Tokyo Japan) Model RF-5000 spectrofluorophotometer with a Model DR-15 controller unit and a 150 W Xenon lamp as a light source. The UV-visible absorption measurements of the samples were carried out on a Shimadzu UV/Vis-160 spectrophotometer. The pH was measured with a Crison (Barcelona, Spain) GLP 21 pHmeter. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a ZEISS EM-900 device (Oberkochen, Germany). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Siemens (Berlin, Germany) D500 X-ray powder diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromatized high-intensity Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 154.050 pm). The refraction index of the samples was determined with an Abbé refractometer (refractometer.com/abbe-refractometer). The infrared spectra (IR) of the samples were measured using a FT-IR Perkin-Elmer Model 1700 spectrometer and the KBr pellets technique with 100 mg of KBr and approximately 0.5 mg of the substance that is being studied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Beef Patty pH Monitoring for Spoilage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH of the samples was measured as a parameter of spoilage, since some hydroperoxide decomposition products are acidic. The pH value of six grams of beef patties was determined according Fan et al. [30 (link)] in triplicate using an electronic pH meter (Crison Instruments, GLP 21 pH METER, Barcelona, Spain). The experiment was performed on days 0, 6 and 13.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Milk Quality Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before analysis, the samples were placed in a heated water bath to reach room temperature and, following that, they were thoroughly mixed by gentle inversion of the sample container multiple times without causing frothing. Milk pH was measured using a glass electrode with a built-in temperature sensor (5014T electrode, Crison, Barcelona, Spain) in a Crison GLP 21 pH-meter (Barcelona, Spain), which was calibrated with standard buffer solutions at pH 4.0 and 7.0 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The electrical conductivity of the samples was measured by a GLP 31 conductometer (Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain) using a Sodium Ion-Selective Electrode 9650, calibrated with 147 μS/cm, 1413 μS/cm, and 12.88 mS/cm buffer solutions. Refractive index and Brix value were determined using a digital refractometer (DR6000-T, Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) set at 20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Membrane Fractionation of Olive Mill Wastewater

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OMW was first centrifuged (Eppendorf 5804, Hamburg, Germany) for 30 min at 4000 rpm in order to separate the remaining solid particles, obtaining a liquid phase with a pH value of 4.85 (GLP-21 pH-meter, Crison, Barcelona, Spain). Afterwards, based on the method described by Bazzarelli et al. [41 (link)], acidification with HCl (37%) was performed by 0.003% (v/w) addition to reach pH = 1.8. After 24 h, the pretreated OMW was used in a two-stage membrane treatment process including ultrafiltration (UF) followed by nanofiltration (NF).
Both UF and NF were performed in batch concentration mode using a stainless steel HP4750 high-pressure stirred cell of 300 mL capacity supplied by Sterlitech Corporation (Kent, WA, USA). For this purpose, an UF flat sheet polysulfone membrane (US100, 100 kDa, Microdyn-Nadir, Wiesbaden, Germany) was used and the permeate obtained from UF was entered to the same stirred cell module equipped with a NF flat sheet polyamide-thin film composite membrane (NF90, 200 Da, Dow Filmtec, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Transmembrane pressures of 5 bar and 10 bar for UF and NF processes, respectively, were supplied by a nitrogen cylinder. Membrane surface area was 14.6 cm2 and both UF and NF treatments were performed at room temperature. The retentate solution obtained by NF treatment was used as the inner aqueous phase in the optimal formulation of W/O/W nanoemulsions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Biofilm pH Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH of the supernatant phase of each PA14 and Newman monoculture and coculture biofilm was measured using a GLP 21 pH meter (Crison®, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona). For this experiment, biofilms were grown in a volume of 3 mL in 6-well polystyrene plates. pH measurements were taken in triplicate for each culture medium and time point, directly in the microplate well where the biofilm was growing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Water Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of the chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), electrical conductivity (EC), and pH were performed following standard methods [16 (link)]. The methods were triplicated and performed with analytical-grade reagents (99% minimum purity).
A Helios Gamma UV–visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Granada, Spain) was used for the analyses of the COD. EC and pH were analysed with a Crison GLP31 conductivity meter and a Crison GLP21 pH meter. TSS were analysed following a standard filtration method [16 (link)].
Also, the effluent was characterised according to the saturation index (SI), determined following the ASTM International method [17 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!