The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using cdp star

1

Quantifying traA mRNA via Northern Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare the traA mRNA contents by Northern hybridization, Anc(C), M54(C), and LKG with pASK-IBA3plus were cultured in LB medium and total RNA was extracted from the cells in logarithmic phase using the SV Total RNA isolation system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA from cells obtained from 0.16 mL of culture with OD600 = 0.27 was subjected to Northern hybridization using a digoxigenin-labeled single-stranded DNA probe, i.e., traA1 for traA and 16SrRNA_1 for 16SrRNA, as an indicator of the amount of total RNA used (Moran et al., 1995 (link)). The signals were detected with CDP-Star (GE Healthcare UK Ltd., Little Chalfont, UK). DynaMarker®; Prestain Marker for RNA High (BioDynamics Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used to obtain the standard curve for RNA length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA Blotting and Hybridization Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight μg of genomic DNA was extracted and digested overnight at 37°C using the restriction endonuclease ClaІ (New England Biolabs Inc.). DNA was fractionated on a 0.8% agarose gel and the genomic DNA was transferred onto a nylon membrane (Amersham, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) by blotting overnight. DNA was cross-linked to the membrane under UV light and a gus gene fragment (S1 Table) used as a probe to hybridize the blot overnight at 50°C. After washing, CDP-star (Amersham, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) was applied evenly over the entire surface, the blot was incubated for 5 min at room temperature and placed in a cassette in contact with X-ray film (Amersham, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and exposed for 90 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of rMC-1 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
rMC-1 cells were seeded (1.5 × 106 cells per well) in 6 cm plates. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [2 (link)]. Briefly, total cell lysates were prepared using Pierce® RIPA Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) and HaltTM Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Single-Use Cocktail, EDTA-free (100×; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) and 0.5 M EDTA solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). Protein concentration was measured using a BCA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). Thirty micrograms of protein per sample were loaded onto a 4–15% mini-protean TGX precast polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan) and then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan). After blocking with Block Ace (KAC Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies listed in Table 2. After washing, the membrane was incubated with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody. Chemiluminescence detection using CDP-star (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Band density was measured using ImageQuant (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromosomal Walking and Inverse PCR in Genomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAC filters were hybridized with probes labeled and detected with CDP-Star (GE Healthcare) or DIG-labeling kit (Roche). Positive signals were confirmed by direct PCR with probe-specific primers on the individual clones. BACs of true positives were column-purified from 5 ml cultures, and end-sequenced with M13 Forward and Reverse primers. Each end sequence is designed for a pair of specific primers, which was used to determine the relative locations of overlapping BACs. Primer pairs from both distal ends were selected to label probes for the next round of chromosomal walking. Inverse PCR (Sambrook and Russell 2001 ) and TAIL-PCR (Liu and Whittier 1995 (link)) were performed to identify flanking sequences when no additional BAC clones could be identified. GpMTD1 probes were the same as those used for the GpMTD1 DNA gel-blot analysis (Hamaji et al. 2009 (link)). The PCR product of GPLEUFATG and GPLEURTAA was labeled to screen for LEU1S alleles (Supplemental Material, Table S1). Two gametologs (WDR57 and DRG1) and their flanking regions, which were not obtained in the MT+ BAC assembly, were obtained by genomic PCR using specific primers based on the MT– alleles. The linkage of MT+ DRG1 was determined by recombination scores as described below. Abundant repetitive regions flanking the MT assembly prevented further chromosomal walking to connect directly to autosomal sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determination of IR Region Orientation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Orientation of the region between IR1 and IR2 [A(α) or I(a)-type] were determined by PCR as previously described with the primers listed in Supplementary Table S28 (link). For Southern blot analysis, O. polymorpha genomic DNA was prepared using a standard protocol. Briefly, DNA was digested with EcoRI restriction enzyme before electrophoresis. A standard protocol was used for blotting and hybridization. DNA probes were prepared, and detection was performed using the AlkPhos direct labeling and detection system with CDP-Star (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Signal intensities were quantified with ImageJ version 1.47 (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Photoshop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to mount the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mapping DNA Replication Intermediates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following 2D electrophoresis, gels were washed sequentially in depurination buffer (0.125 M HCl), denaturation buffer (0.5 M NaOH, 1.5 M NaCl) and neutralisation buffer (0.5 M Tris–HCl, 1.5 M NaCl pH 7.5) with washes in ddH2O in-between each buffer. DNA was transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare) by capillary action in 20× SCC (3 M NaCl, 350 mM NaOC trisodium citrate pH 7.0). Membranes were cross-linked using a UV Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene) at 1200 J/m and subsequently blocked in hybridisation buffer (5× SSC, 5% Dextran sulphate (Sigma-Aldrich, D8906) 0.2% Tropix I-Block (Applied Biosystems, T2015), 0.1% SDS) for at least 1 h at 60°C.
Catenated pRS316 plasmids or replication intermediates from pRS426-RFB were probed with DNA amplified from pRS316 (probing specifically for the URA3 gene). Labelling and detection used random prime labelling incorporating fluorescein tagged dUTP (Roche). Following probing, hybridized fluorescein tagged dUTP was detected with alkaline phosphatase tagged anti fluorescein Fab fragments (Roche), revealed with CDP-Star (GE Healthcare) and non-saturating exposures acquired on an ImageQuant LAS4000 system (GE Healthcare). Densitometry analysis was carried out using ImageQuant TL software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CTAB-based Genomic DNA Extraction and Southern Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (30 µg), extracted by the cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method26 , was digested with HindIII, resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis, and blotted onto a Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, UK). A GFP gene-specific probe was directly labelled with alkaline phosphatase using the AlkPhos Direct labelling kit (GE Healthcare, UK). Hybridisation, washing and chemiluminescent detection with CDP Star were performed as recommended by the supplier (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Southern Blot Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Southern blot hybridization was performed according to standard procedures (Sambrook et al., 1989 ) as described previously (Ninagawa et al., 2011 (link)). Specific probes were prepared as described previously (Ninagawa et al., 2014 (link)) and labeled with digoxigenin. Subsequent reaction with anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche) and treatment with the chemiluminescent detection reagent CDP-star (GE Healthcare) were performed according to the manufacturers’ specifications. Chemiluminescence was visualized using an LAS-3000mini Lumino Image analyzer (Fujifilm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA Gel Blot Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA gel blot analysis9 (link) was performed as below: ∼3 μg of genomic DNA was digested with appropriate restriction enzyme(s) (see Supplementary Figs 2, 4 and 7), run on 0.7% (w/v) SeaKemGTG agarose (BME, Rockland, ME, USA), and transferred to a Hybond N+ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Probe labelling, hybridization and detection were performed using the AlkPhos direct labelling and detection system with CDP-Star (GE Healthcare) according to the supplier's instructions. Primers used for probe amplification are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Southern Blot Analysis of Flounder Rh2-b Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 10 μg of genomic DNA per lane was digested with the restriction enzymes Eco RI, Pst I, or Sac I (TaKaRa) and electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel. DNA samples were then transferred to a Hybond‐N+ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) using a Model 785 vacuum blotter (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). DNA was fixed to the membrane using an XL‐1500 UV cross‐linker (Spectroline, NY, USA). As a hybridization probe, exon 1 of the barfin flounder rh2‐b gene was used (previously described in Kasagi et al., 2015). Amplified cDNA was labeled with an Alkphos‐Direct labeling kit (GE Healthcare), and hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Stringent washing was conducted at 60°C in primary buffer wash (per the manufacturer's instructions), which contained 0.2 M of NaCl and 0.1% of SDS, which allowed approximately 20% mismatch (Sambrook & Russell, 2001). Signals were detected using CDP‐Star (GE Healthcare) and Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!