The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Autosamdri 814

Manufactured by Tousimis
Sourced in United States

The Autosamdri-814 is a critical point dryer for sample preparation in electron microscopy. It is designed to dry samples while preserving their original structure and morphology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using autosamdri 814

1

Preparation of Cryo-Fractured HeLa Cells for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
0.1cm3 sections of CM3D with HeLa cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde in a 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) with 2% sucrose, 5mM calcium chloride, 5mM magnesium chloride for 3.5 hours on an oscillating shaker. The specimens were gently rinsed in buffer for 10 minutes then placed in 1% osmium tetroxide and 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer overnight before washed in ultrapure water (NANOpure Infinity®, Barnstead/Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, Maryland). The specimens were then dehydrated through successive gradients of ethanol (25%, 50%, 70%, 95% and 100%). Once the specimens were in 100% ethanol, they were immersed in liquid nitrogen, placed on a brass surface submerged in liquid nitrogen, and fractured into smaller pieces using a pre-chilled wooden dowel. The pieces were then returned to 100% ethanol and processed in a critical point dryer (Autosamdri-814; Tousimis; Rockville, Maryland). The samples were mounted on aluminum stubs with double-sided carbon adhesive tabs, sputter coated with gold-palladium or platinum, and observed in a scanning electron microscope (S3500N, Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc.; Schaumberg, Illinois) at an accelerating voltage of 5.00kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots from each sample were filtered through a 0.2 micrometre filter (Corning Inc.), fixed with a 2% paraformalin - 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution, and lightly washed with filtered-sterile phosphate buffer (PBS). Then, small pieces of the filters were placed inside microporous capsules (30 μm pore size, available from Ted Pella Inc. product number 4619) and subjected to successive dehydration steps in growing ethanol solutions up to 100% ethanol, following critical point drying in an Autosamdri 814 (Tousimis). These fragments were then placed on SEM stubs with silver conducting paint TAAB S269 and examined under a scanning electron microscope Hitachi S-4100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single Cell Bacilli SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions of bacilli were fixed overnight at 24°C on poly-lysine coated glass slides in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate pH 7.3 containing 4% formaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde, followed by 1% aqueous osmium tetroxide for 1 h, and then dehydrated in an increasing ethanol concentrations series (50% to 100%), and finally critical-point-dried in liquid carbon dioxide using Tousimis Autosamdri 814. Immediately after the process, the samples were coated with a thin layer (7.5 nm thick) Au/Pt mixture using Denton DeskII sputtering system, and inspected using field emission SEM (Sigma HD, Zeiss) under high vacuum mode with working distance of 5 mm. Cellular measurements were performed using Freehand software (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of S. Heidelberg on Turkey Skin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Turkey skin samples (1 inch × 1 inch) inoculated with S. Heidelberg (4 log10 CFU/sq. inch) was dipped in 1% PEO for 5 min at 4°C. Non-inoculated skin samples dipped in sterile DI water or PEOs were used as negative controls. S. Heidelberg dipped in sterile DI water for 5 min served as S. Heidelberg controls. Sample preparation for electron microscopy was conducted as previously described with some modifications (Lee et al., 2014 (link)). Briefly, immediately after each treatment, the skin samples were stored in primary fixative [3% paraformaldehyde, 1.5% glutaraldehyde, and 2.5% sucrose in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer with 5mM calcium chloride and 5mM magnesium chloride (pH 7.4)] for 12 h. Then the samples were fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 12 h. Then the samples were washed in ultrapure water (NANOpure Infinity®; Barnstead/Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MD, United States) and dehydrated by ascending grades of ethanol series. Samples were processed in a critical point dryer (Autosamdri-814; Tousimis; Rockville, MD, United States) and mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with gold-palladium, and observed using a scanning electron microscope (S3500N; Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc.; Schaumberg, Illinois; University of Minnesota Imaging Center) at an accelerating voltage of 5.00 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histopathological and SEM Analysis of Rat Kidney and Bladder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The right kidney and half of the bladder were collected, fixed (formalin for kidney; 2% paraformaldehyde/2% glutaraldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 for bladder), embedded in paraffin, cut approximately 5 μm thick, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histopathologic examination. Bladders were inflated, harvested, fixed, and divided in half-longitudinally as per (Cohen et al., 2007 (link).) Half the bladder from 2 rats/sex/group were processed for SEM as follows: dehydration through an ascending ethanol series; critical point dried out of ethanol (Autosamdri-814, Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD); mounted on SEM stubs using double sided, conductive carbon adhesive and ‘iron cross’ cuts to flatten the tissue; gold coated by plasma sputtering at partial vacuum (0.17 mBar, 20 sec; Cressington 108 Sputter Coater, Cressington Scientific Instruments Ltd., Watford, England); and imaged at a working distance of 15 mm and an accelerating voltage of 5 kilovolts at 20 microamps using the SEM instrument (JEM 6700, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Representative SEM images were captured at 250x, 500x, 1000x, and 2500x magnification. A board-certified veterinary pathologist identified and scored lesions evident by light microscopy and SEM using a four-step grading system (minimal, mild, moderate, and marked).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SEM Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) overnight at 4°C, rinsed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, then placed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer overnight at 4°C. Specimens were rinsed in ultrapure water (NANOpure Infinity; Barnstead/Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, Maryland), dehydrated in an ethanol series, and processed in a critical point dryer (Autosamdri-814; Tousimis; Rockville, Maryland). Material was mounted on double-sided adhesive carbon tabs on aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with gold-palladium, and observed in a scanning electron microscope (S3500N; Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc.; Schaumberg, Illinois) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Lice Genitalia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The male lice were removed from the Karnovsky fixative and washed in phosphate buffer for 3 h at 22 ± 1 °C. Samples were post-fixed with 2% osmium, washed with distilled water, then dehydrated with ethanol at increasing concentrations (30, 50, 70, 90, and 100%), and dried with CO2 using an Autosamdri-814 critical point dryer (Tousimis Research, Rockville, MD). The specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs using double-sided carbon tape. Next, the samples were coated with gold–palladium using a sputter coater (Polaron SC7640; Quorum Technologies, Laughton, East Sussex, UK) for 4 min. To improve conduction, a film of silver particles (OW52765459; Agar Scientific, Stansted, Essex, UK) was applied to the genitalia of nine specimens (two with partially extruded genitalia and seven with fully extruded genitalia). One specimen with fully extruded genitalia was not covered with the film. Images of the complete specimens and the specific structures of the genital area were taken. The samples were examined under a Hitachi S4800 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and working distances of 8.7–10.2 mm. Images of 1280 × 960 pixel resolution were acquired.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Insect Hindguts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small fragments (2–5 mm) of B. crini and H. euphorbiae hindguts were dissected. Fragments were fixed by immersion into paraformaldehyde 2% – glutaraldehyde 2.5% for more than 2 h, washed with water and refixed by osmium tetroxide for 20 min, washed and dehydrated in absolute ethanol. These pieces were placed inside microporous capsules (30 μm pore size, available from Ted Pella Inc. product number 4619) immersed in absolute ethanol, following critical point drying in an Autosamdri 814 (Tousimis). Dry samples were then arranged on SEM stubs with silver conducting paint TAAB S269. Pieces were manipulated under a stereomicroscope Leica MZ9.5 with Dumont forceps number 5. Stubs were examined under a scanning electron microscope Hitachi S-4100. Images were edited with Photoshop CS3 (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microstructural Analysis of Clot Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microstructure analysis, both formulations were histologically stained for haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and may-grunwald-giemsa (MGG) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Briefly, clots were fixed in 10% formalin for 24 h, dehydrated and then embedded in paraffin. The resulting blocks were cut into 6 µm slices and stained for observation under optical microscope (Leica DMLB, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to evaluate the ultrastructure of formulations. Samples were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, fixed with osmium tetroxide (1% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate) and finally dehydrated through ascending alcohol concentrations. Thereafter, clots were subjected to critical point drying (Autosamdri 814, Tousimis, Rockville, USA), gold sputter coated and imaged using an electron microscope (S-4800, Hitachi, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Trichomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stem trichome images were acquired using the Nikon SMZ18 stereo microscope equipped with the DS Ri2 colour camera and run by the NiS Elements AR software. The total image magnification was 15x. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), leaf pieces were fixed for at least 1 h under vacuum while submerged in 2.5% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate at room temperature, then stored overnight at 4 °C. Samples were rinsed in buffer, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in buffer overnight at 4 °C, rinsed in ultrapure water (NANOpure Infinity®; Barnstead/Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, Maryland), and dehydrated in an ethanol series. Samples were then processed in a critical point dryer (Autosamdri-814; Tousimis; Rockville, Maryland). Material was mounted on aluminum stubs using double-sided adhesive carbon tabs and colloidal graphite, sputter-coated with gold-palladium, and observed in a scanning electron microscope (S3500N; Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc.; Schaumberg, Illinois) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!