The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using anti il 10 pe

1

Quantifying Murine Colonic CD4+ IL-10

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse colonic CD4+ cells were staining with Alexa 647-CD25 (Biolegand Inc., San Diego, CA) for 30 min in the dark. They then were washing once, fixed, permeabilized and intracellular stained for IL-10 following the eBioscience intracellular staining protocol using anti-IL10-PE (from eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating T-cell Subsets in Asthmatic Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the recruitment of Th1, Th2, and Tregs induced by ASCs treatment, LLN cells from OVA-induced asthmatic mice and ASCs-treated asthmatic mice were cultured in anti-CD3-coated plate for 6 h. To evaluate To evaluate CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ (Tregs) and IL-10+/CD4+ T cells, cells were stained with anti-CD4-FITC (0.5 mg/ml) and anti-CD25-APC (0.2 mg/ml) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA). After surface staining, the cells were permeabilized using a Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (eBiosciences). After permeabilization, the cells were stained with anti-Foxp3-PE-cy7 or anti-IL-10-PE (eBiosciences).
To assess the Th1 and Th2 cell population, LLNs cells were stained with an anti-CD4-FITC Ab. After surface staining, the CD4+ T cells were stained with intracellular anti-IFN-γ-PE-cy7 (eBiosciences) and anti-IL-4-PE (eBiosciences) Abs. Fluorescence was measured using a FACS CantoII cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with Canto software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing T Cell Subsets in Asthma Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the recruitment of Th1, Th2, and Treg induced by ASC sup treatment, the LLN cells of the OVA-induced animal model of acute asthma and ASC sup-treated animal model of acute asthma were cultured on anti-CD3-coated plates for 6 hours. To determine the CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ (Treg) and IL-10+/CD4+ T cell populations, the cells were stained with anti-CD4-FITC (0.5 mg/ml) and/or anti-CD25-APC (0.2 mg/ml) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). After surface staining, the cells were permeabilized using a Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (eBioscience). After permeabilization, the cells were stained with anti-Foxp3-PE-cy7 or anti-IL-10-PE (eBioscience). To quantify the Th1 and Th2 cell populations, the LLN cells were stained with an anti-CD4-FITC antibody. After surface staining, the CD4+ T cells were stained with intracellular anti-IFN-γ-PE-cy7 (eBioscience) and anti-IL-4-PE (eBioscience) antibodies. Fluorescence was measured using a FACS CantoII cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with Canto software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating T-cell Subsets in Asthma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the recruitment of Th1, Th2, and Tregs induced by ASCs treatment, LLN cells from OVA-induced asthmatic mice and ASC-treated asthmatic mice were cultured in anti-CD3-coated plates for 6 h. To evaluate CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ (Tregs) and IL-10+/CD4+ T-cells, cells were stained with anti-CD4-FITC (0.5 mg/mL) and anti-CD25-APC (0.2 mg/mL) following the manufacturer’s recommendations (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA). After surface staining, cells were permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences). After permeabilization, cells were stained with anti-Foxp3-PE-cy7 or anti-IL-10-PE (eBiosciences).
To assess the Th1 and Th2 cell populations, LLN cells were stained with anti-CD4-FITC Ab. After surface staining, CD4+ T-cells were stained with intracellular anti-IFN-γ-PE-cy7 (eBiosciences) and anti-IL-4-PE (eBiosciences) Abs. Fluorescence was measured using a FACS CantoII cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with Canto software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
anti-CD14-BV570 (301831, Biolegend), anti-CD11c-PerCP-Cy5.5 (337210), anti-HLA-DR-AlexaFlour700 (307626) all from Biolegend, anti-CD66a/c/e-QDot605 (342302, Biolegend, with in-house conjugation to QDot605, Q-22001), anti-CD16-PE-Cy5 (555408, from BD Biosciences), anti-IL-12-PE (554575), anti-TNF-α-PE-Cy7 (25-7349-82) both from eBioscience, anti-IL-10-PE (506804), anti-IL-6-APC (501112), anti-CD3-BV421 (300434), anti-CD19-BV421 (302233) and anti-CD335-BV421 (331913) all from Biolegend.
Cryopreserved, fixed white cells were washed in PBS and stained for 1 hour at 4°C with surface marker antibodies. For intracellular staining, cells were permeabilized with Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences) and incubated for 1 hour at 4°C with antibodies for intracellular markers. Fixed cells were then acquired on a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed with the following antibodies: anti-CD19-Percp-Cy5.5, anti-CD19-Percp-eFluor710, anti-CD24-FITC, anti-CD38-superbright600, anti-CD38-PE, anti-Ki-67-Alexa Fluor647, anti-IL-10-PE, anti-TIM-1-PE, anti-CD4-FITC, anti-IFN-γ-PE, anti-IL-17A-APC (eBioscience, San Diego CA, USA), anti-IL-6-APC, anti-TNF-α-FITC, anti-IL-12-BV-421, and anti-CD24-Alexa Fluor647 (BD Biosciences, France). Intracellular cytokines and Ki-67 were assessed in cells treated with Permeabilization and IC Fixation Buffers (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Stained cells were analyzed with a 21-color ZE5 cell analyzer (Bio-Rad, USA). The CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B subset was sorted (FACSAria; BD Pharmingen) using anti-CD19-Percp-Cy5.5, anti-CD24-FITC, and anti-CD38-PE. The sort purity of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells was routinely >90%. CD4+T subpopulation was sorted (FACSAria; BD Pharmingen) using anti-CD38-PE and anti-CD3-PE. The sort purity of CD4+T cells was routinely >95%. All flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowjoV10 Software (Tree Star, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Costimulatory Molecules on DCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of costimulatory molecules on DCs was quantified by flow cytometry using anti-CD11c-Pe/Cy7, anti-CD86-PerCP (both BioLegend), and biotinylated anti-CD40 (eBioscience; detected by streptavidin-APC/Cy7, BD Pharmingen) antibodies, with the gating strategy shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Popliteal DLN cells (106/ml) from in vivo models were incubated ± 50 ng/ml PMA plus 500 ng/ml ionomycin for 1 h before addition of 10 µg/ml Brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) for a further 5 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Phenotypic markers were labelled using anti-CD4-FITC or anti-CD4-PerCP (both BD Bioscience) and anti-KJ1.26-APC (eBioscience) before the cells were fixed and permeabilized employing the FOXP3 Fix/Perm buffer set according to eBioscience protocols40 (link). Cells were then labelled using anti-IL-17A-PerCP or APC/Cy7, anti-IFN-γ-APC or PeCy7, anti-IL-4-PE, anti-IL-10-PE and anti-FOXP3-APC (all eBioscience) antibodies for 30 min prior to flow cytometry. Data were acquired using a FACSCanto immunocytometry system (BD Pharmingen) with samples gated according to appropriate isotype and fluorescence minus one controls and analysed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc, OR, USA, version 7.6.1). The gating strategy for the adoptive transfer model is shown in Supplementary Figure 2 whilst those for analysis of DLN cells from CIA mice are shown in Supplementary Figures 3 and 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated cells, following preincubation with naive mouse serum in staining buffer (PBS, 2% FCS, 0.2% sodium azide), were labeled with the following conjugated antibodies purchased from BD Biosciences Pharmingen: anti-CD3 FITC, PE, PerCP, APC (17A2); anti-CD4 FITC, PE, PerCP, APC (L3T4); anti-CD25 FITC (7D4), PE (PC61); anti-GITR FITC, PE, APC; CD152 FITC, PE APC. For intracellular staining, cells were stimulated with PMA (100 ng/ml) and ionomycin (2 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) in complete medium overnight and for 6 hrs in the presence of brefeldin A (10 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized in 0.5% saponin, and stained with anti-IL-10 PE, APC (JES5-16E3); IL-17 PE, APC (eBio17B7); IFN-γ PE, APC (XMG1.2); TGF-β PE, APC (A75-3.1) Foxp3 PE, APC (FJK-16s); and ROR-γt PE, APC (AFKJS-9) (eBioscience). Fluorochrome (FITC, PE, PerCPAPC)-labeled isotype-matched control antibodies were used for background fluorescence staining. Staining was analyzed by FACScalibur flow cytometry (BD Pharmingen,) using CellQuest Pro software. Fluorescence intensity was compared to cells stained with corresponding labeled isotype-matched control antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Characterization of Regulatory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs were isolated from peripheral blood by Ficoll gradient centrifugation (DAKEWE, Shenzhen), CD4+CD25high Treg cells and CD8+ T cells were sorted from PBMCs by flow cytometry through signalling of appropriate antibodies: anti‐CD4‐FICT (Biolegend), anti‐CD25‐APC (Biolegend) and anti‐CD8‐Percp‐cy5.5 (Biolegend), respectively. The antibodies were incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes in the dark. Flow cytometric analyses were performed using Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) Canto II (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), and the results were analysed with BD FACSDiva Software version 6.1.2. For detection of surface molecules of CD4+CD25high regulatory cells, PBMCs were incubated with the appropriate mAb: anti‐CD4‐FITC (eBioscience) and anti‐CD25‐PE (eBioscience). For intracellular staining including the staining of Foxp3, HO‐1, IL‐10, LAP and CTLA‐4, cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained according to the manufacturer's instruction. The following mAb were used: anti‐Foxp3‐APC (eBioscience), anti‐HO‐1‐PE (Abcam), anti‐IL‐10‐PE (eBioscience), anti‐LAP‐PerCP (eBioscience) and anti‐CTLA‐4‐PE (Biolegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunization and Analysis of Arthritis in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flt3L−/−, WT and Batf3−/− mice were immunized as previously described [23 (link)] and were inspected three times a week for signs of arthritis by two independent observers. All mice were sacrificed on day 43 after CIA induction. Blood, LNs and paws were harvested for analysis. Single-cell suspensions were obtained and after erythrocyte lysis (red blood cell lysis buffer, 2 ​min ​at RT; Sigma), cells were stained with the indicated fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for surface markers and intracellular cytokines. LN cells were stained using the following markers: anti-TNF (APC, eBioscience), anti-IL-2 (APC, eBioscience), anti-IL-17 (Alexa 488, eBioscience), anti-IFNγ (PercP Cy5.5, eBioscience), anti-IL10 (PE, eBioscience), anti-GM-CSF (PE, eBioscience), anti-B220 (PerCP, eBioscience), anti-CD19 (Alexa 700, eBioscience), anti-GL7 (biotin, eBioscience), anti-IgD (PE, BD Pharmingen), anti-CD38 (FITC, eBioscience), anti-CD95 (APC, eBioscience) and streptavidin (PE-Cy7, eBioscience). Synovial cells were isolated and stained using antibodies against CD11c (PE-Cy7, eBioscience), MHCII (APC-Cy7, eBioscience), CD11b (Alexa 700) and CD103 (FITC, eBioscience). Serum levels of antibodies against chicken collagen type II (cCII) were measured by ELISA. Further details are described in supplementary methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!