The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using su1510 sem

1

Adsorbent Preparation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lignin (Lig) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Calcined Lig at 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 °C was prepared by keeping it in a muffle furnace for 2 h (denoted as Lig200, Lig400, Lig600, Lig800, and Lig1000, respectively). Cadmium chloride was purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co. (Osaka, Japan).
The morphologies of each adsorbent were measured by scanning electron microscopy SU1510 (SEM, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan). The specific surface area and pore volumes were analyzed using a specific surface analyzer NOVA4200e (Quantachrome Instruments Japan G.K., Kanagawa, Japan). The surface functional groups were analyzed by the Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy system 460Plus (JASCO Co., Tokyo, Japan). The binding energy and elemental distribution of the adsorbent surface were measured by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy system AXIS-NOVA (Shimadzu Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) and electron microanalyzer JXA-8530F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Morphological Characterization of Ginseng Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ginseng powders were observed under the SU1510 SEM (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo Japan) for morphological characterization before and after extraction. Five samples of the untreated residue, the ultrasound extracted residue using 50 mL of 70% methanol (USP Reference Standards) [23] , the chloroform refluxed residue, the standard residue using the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [10] , and the ultrasound extracted residue using n-butanol were used for the SEM analysis. The study on the role of the solvent in the extraction of ginsenosides from ginseng materials was processed by comparing the effects of different solvents on the morphological changes, which could indicate the ability of the release of intracellular ginsenosides into the extract indirectly. All ultrasound extractions were performed for 30 min at the frequency of 50 kHz and the ultrasonic power of 250 W. After drying the extracted residues at 60 °C in an air oven, all samples were fixed on a specimen holder with a carbon double-sided tape (NISSHIN EM Co., Ltd., Tokyo) and then sputtered with gold in a KYKY SBC-12 sputter-coater (KYKY Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) to be examined with SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Nano-materials via Advanced Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents and chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and used as-received. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were acquired using a JEOL JSM-6701 F field-emission instrument and a Hitachi SU 1510 SEM. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were acquired using a JEOL JEM-2100 F at 200 kV (Center for Microcrystal Assembly, Sogang University). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were acquired using a Park NX10. The simulated SAED patterns were acquired using the ‘SingleCrystal’ interface (Version 1.3.0) of the CrystalMaker software (Version 2.2.0; CrystalMaker Software Ltd). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured using a Rigaku Ultima IV instrument equipped with a graphite monochromated Cu Kα radiation source (40 kV, 40 mA). Infrared (IR) spectra of solid samples were obtained using a Jasco FT/IR 4200 spectrometer and an attenuated total reflection module. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) measurements were conducted using a Shimadzu TGA-50 under a nitro­gen atmosphere at a heating rate of 5°C min−1. 1H NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker Advance II 300 spectrometer (1H NMR, 300 MHz) with chemical shifts reported relative to residual deuterated solvent peaks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of BVONB/RGO Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline structures of both the BVONB and BVONB/RGO nanocomposite were analyzed using a Rigaku Ultima IV XRD with a wavelength of 0.15406 nm derived from copper radiation, operating at 30 mA and 40 kV across a span of 10° to 70°. The Hitachi SU1510 SEM was employed to scrutinize the morphology and EDS data of the samples. The size and architecture of the nanoparticles were further investigated with a Hitachi H7650 TEM. Raman Spectra, spanning 500–2500 cm−1, were recorded using the Xplora Horiba Scientific. The Xanes Probe II XPS was used, equipped with an Mg K anode, to undertake a qualitative analysis of elemental constituents present on the BVONB/RGO surface. For recognizing the surface functional groups, a range of 400 to 4000 cm−1 was chosen and measured using a PerkinElmer FTIR. Lastly, the PerkinElmer STA 8000 performed thermogravimetric analysis at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in a nitrogen setting. Differential thermal analysis (TGA-DTA) was conducted to ascertain the RGO percentage within the BVONB/RGO nanocomposite.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lyophilized Hydrogel Morphology Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 4% (wt/vol) VCL and S‐VCL‐S proteins solution were mixed with 0.1% (wt/vol) H2O2. The hydrogels were then lyophilized with a FreeZone Plus 6 L cascade console freeze‐dry system (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). The lyophilized hydrogels were sputter‐coated with a thin layer of a palladium/gold alloy to improve the surface conductivity for SEM. Images of the morphology and microstructure of the hydrogels were acquired using a Hitachi SU1510 SEM (Tokyo, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Freeze-Dried Gelatin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different concentrations of gelatin solutions were freeze-dried using a freeze-drying system. A thin layer of palladium/gold alloy was placed on the lyophilized hydrogel to improve the surface conductivity for SEM. Morphological and microstructural images of the gelatin were acquired using a Hitachi SU1510 SEM at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Complex Coacervate Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FTIR experiments were performed using an FTIR spectrophotometer (Nicolet-460, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The complexes obtained after freeze-drying were milled and pressed with potassium bromide and polymer in a ratio of 200:1. Transmittance values between 4000 cm−1 and 400 cm−1 were measured to determine the functional relationship between the different compounds.
XRD analyses of the samples were performed using a smart X-ray diffractometer (SmartLab 3KW, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), according to Dong et al. [20 (link)], with slight modifications. The prepared powder was flattened on a glass plate for X-ray diffraction analysis, and the scanning range was 2θ from 5o to 50°, with a step size of 5 °/min/scan rate.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the samples was conducted using a SU1510 SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The freeze-dried powder was adhered to a double-sided adhesive tape, coated with gold, and observed using a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of 500×.
An FEI Tecnai 12 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, NH, USA) was used for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A drop of the complex coacervate solution was placed on a 400-mesh copper grid. The grids were then dried overnight at 40 °C, and the morphology of the samples was observed using an electron microscope with a single-tilt sample rack at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dried Sample SEM Observation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All treated samples were dried using freeze dryer (LABCONCO) and stored at −80 °C. The dried samples were used for observation for scanning electronic microscope (SEM) by Hitachi SU1510 SEM at, 500X, 1000X and 5000X magnification at BSE mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Preparation of Bacterial Samples for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Petri dish microcultures of the strain ENCB-J15 were inoculated, grown in squares of GAE solid medium covered by a circular coverslip, and incubated at 28 °C for 10 days. The coverslip with a culture sample was placed on a 12-well microplate and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde for 2 h, dehydrated with 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% ethanol each for 10 min for each dissolution, and finally dehydrated with absolute alcohol for 20 min [27 (link)]. The sample was critically dried with CO2 using the Emitech K850 Critical Point Dryer to remove all moisture and subsequently mounted on aluminum sample holders with adhesive carbon tape. The sample was coated with a layer of gold at 20 mA for 2 min using Quorum Q15OR-ES equipment. Finally, the sample was observed in a Hitachi SU1510 SEM at 10–15 kW [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specific morphologies of materials were examined by a Hitachi SU-1510 SEM. XRD (Rigaku/max-2550V, Hitachi) with Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 40 MA) was used to characterize the crystal structure of materials. FT-IR spectra were recorded in a region from 500–4000 cm−1 by an FT-IR spectrometer (Nicolet-380, Thermo Fisher) to determine the functional groups in materials. XPS (K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher) was obtained under a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (1486.60 eV). A UV-Vis spectrophotometer (8453, Agilent) and a visible spectrophotometer (722, Tairen) were used to monitor the reaction process. A pH meter (PHS-25, Yueping) was used to determine the solution's pH. An electrochemical workstation was used to measure the Mott–Schottky and EIS curves of materials (CHI660E, CH Instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!