The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Illustrator cs6 cc

Manufactured by Adobe
Sourced in United States

Illustrator CS6/CC is a vector graphics editing software developed by Adobe. It is a core component of the Adobe Creative Cloud suite, primarily used for creating and manipulating vector-based illustrations, logos, and artwork. Illustrator provides a range of tools and features for designing and modifying vector graphics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using illustrator cs6 cc

1

Three-dimensional reconstruction of biological samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Living specimens were photographed with a Canon 600D Camera mounted on a Zeiss- Stemi 2000. Parafin- and semithin sections were analyzed with an Olympus microscope (BX-51). Sections were photographed with an Olympus camera (Olympus cc12) using the dot slide system (2.2 Olympus, Hamburg) and aligned using imod [58 (link)] and imod align (http://www.q-terra.de/biowelt/3drekon/guides/imod_first_aid.pdf). 3D reconstructions were performed with Fiji (1.45b) [57 (link)]/trakem [59 (link)] and Amira (5.0). Adobe (San Jose, CA, USA) Photoshop (CC) and Illustrator (CS6/CC) were used to prepare all figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prism 8.0 was used to analyze data and plot figures. All figures were edited in Adobe Illustrator CS6/CC. Data were first subjected to a normality test using the D’Agostino & Pearson normality test or the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. When homogeneity was assumed, a parametric analysis of variance test was used. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to compare multiple groups and days/trials of testing. When necessary, Greenhouse-Geisser estimates of sphericity were used to correct for degrees of freedom. Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was used to find post-hoc differences among groups. The student’s t-test (paired and unpaired) and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine significance between two groups. Chi-square test was used to analyze the differences in the use of search strategies in the Barnes Maze. Statistical data are provided in the figures. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analyses for Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Matlab R2016a, PASW Statistics 18.0, Prism 7.0 and Adobe Illustrator CS6/CC were used to analyze data and plot figures. Student’s t-test was used to compare two groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare multiple groups. When necessary, multiple comparisons post hoc test (MCT) was used (Holm–Sidak’s test). When homogeneity was not assumed, the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric ANOVA was selected for multiple statistical comparisons. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine significance between groups. Statistical data are provided in the figures. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Data Analysis and Visualization Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MATLAB (2019a or above) and Prism 8.0 were used to analyze data and plot figures. All figures were created using Adobe Illustrator CS6/CC. Data were first subjected to a normality test using the D’Agostino and Pearson normality test or the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. When homogeneity was assumed, a parametric analysis of variance test was used. The Student’s t-test was used to compare two groups. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to determine the significance between groups. Two sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to calculate the statistical differences between the contrast of USVs and noise. Statistical data are provided in text and in the figures. In the text, values are provided as mean ± SEM. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The 95% confidence intervals are reported in reference to the mean. The true positive rate is computed as the ratio between true positive (hit) and real positive cases. The true negative rate is the ratio between true negative (correct rejection) and real negative cases. The false negative rate is the ratio between false negative (type I error) and real positives cases. The false positive (type II error) is the ratio between false positive and real negative cases. The false discovery rate is the ratio between false positive and the sum of false positives and real positives.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!