The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman filters paper no 1

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United Kingdom

Whatman filter paper No. 1 is a general-purpose filter paper designed for basic filtration applications. It has a medium-fast flow rate and is suitable for a variety of aqueous and organic solutions. The paper is made from high-quality cotton linters and is free of binders or additives.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using whatman filters paper no 1

1

Methanol Extraction of Coarsely Powdered Root

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In an Erlenmeyer conical flask, one kilogram of the coarsely powdered root was macerated in 80% methanol (1:6 ratio)23 for three days with regular shaking. After three days, the mixture was filtered with sterile gauze followed by Whatman filters paper No. 1. To increase the extract yield, the residue was again macerated twice with the same amount of methanol for a total of six days. The mixed filtrates were evaporated and concentrated by a rotatory evaporator and a drying oven at 40°C, respectively. Finally, the concentrated extract was frozen in a deep freezer and then freeze dried in a lyophilizer to remove the water from the extract. The final dried extract (131.20 gm) was stored in a refrigerator at −4°C until required.24 (link),25 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Maceration and Freeze-Drying of Plant Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In an erlenmeyer flask, 1.8 kg of powder was macerated for 72 hours in 80% methanol which means 20% of it was aqueous solvent (250 g in 1500 mL) with intermittent stirring at room temperature. The mixture was filtered twice, first with a muslin cloth and then with Whatman filters paper No. 1 after 72 hours. The filtrate was maintained at 4℃ in the refrigerator, while the marc was macerated twice for 72 hours each time with the same volume of 80% methanol to extract the plant material completely. A rotary evaporator was used to concentrate the combined filtrate obtained from consecutive maceration under decreasing pressure (Hamato, Japan). The extract was then freeze-dried to eliminate the water solvent using a lyophilizer (Labfreez, China).22 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extraction and Characterization of Kebericho Root Powder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The roots of the plant were washed with tape water to remove dust and any other debris present on it. The roots of E. kebericho were then air dried under a shaded area at room temperature and pulverized using a pestle and mortar to get a coarse powder. A total of 1.50 kg powdered root was macerated using 80% (v/v) methanol. The contents were shaken manually each day and allowed to remain within the solvent for 3 days. After 3 days, the extract was filtered first using gauze and then by Whatman filters paper (No. 1). The marc was re-macerated twice using the same volume of solvent to exhaustively extract the plant material. After extraction was completed, the solvent was evaporated under vacuum using rotary vapor and oven at 40°C. The resulting solution was then placed in a deep freezer operating at −20°C till it forms solid ice and then the remaining solvent (water) was removed using lyophilizer. After all a brownish gummy residue weighing 224gm of crude extract was obtained, giving rise to a percentage yield of 14.93%. Then, the resulting crude extract was kept within deep refrigerator (−20°c) till the commencement of the main procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Yield Optimization of Medicinal Plant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected plant material was wrapped with plastic sheets during transportation then washed carefully under running tap water to remove dirt and soil then dried at room temperature under shade and reduced to the appropriate size by using mortar and pestles. A total of 2 kg of dried leaves and 900 g of dried roots were extracted by maceration (50 g of dried leaves in 300 mL of 80% methanol and 1 g of dried roots in 8–10mL of 80% methanol) for 72 h. The extraction process was facilitated manually by vigorous shaking and stirring. The mixture was first filtered using a muslin cloth and then with Whatman filters paper No.1. The residue has macerated a total of three times to obtain the maximum yield.
Filtration and collection of the extract were done three times with the whole extraction taking 9 days. After the extraction, methanol was evaporated under an oven at 40°C. The resulting solution was placed in a deep freezer operating at negative 20°C till it forms solid ice and then the remaining solvent (water) was removed using a lyophilizer. After water removal, a dark green gummy residue weighing 250.46g was obtained; giving rise to a percentage yield of 12.49% from the leaf, and a light yellow powder weighing 65g was obtained from the root part, giving rise to a percentage yield of 7.2%. The residue was then stored at 40°C (deep freezer) until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Methanolic Extraction of Dried Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves were air dried at room temperature under shade and reduced to appropriate size by grinding with an electric mill. A total of (600 g) dried leaves were extracted by maceration (100 g of dried leave in 600 ml of 80% methanol) for 72 h. The extraction process was facilitated by using an orbital shaker at 120 rpm. The mixture was first filtered using gauze and then with Whatman filters paper No. 1 (Whatman®, England). The residue was re-macerated for another 72 h twice and filtered. The combined filtrates were then dried by rotary evaporator (Buchi Rota vapor, Switzerland) at a temperature of 40°C. After drying, a total of 74.4 g of dry extract was harvested (18.6% yield) and the dried extract was kept at −20°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ethanolic Extraction of Dried Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves were air dried at room temperature under shade and ground to a powder using pestle and mortar. A total of 250 g dried leaves were macerated in 80% of 2.5-l ethanol (1:10 w/v) for 72 h. The extraction was carried out by using an orbital shaker at 120 rpm. The mixture was first filtered with gauze and then Whatman filters paper No. 1 (Whatman®, England). The mark was re-macerated for another 72 h twice and filtered. The combined ethanol filtrates were then concentrated by rotary evaporator (Buchi Rota vapor, Switzerland) at a temperature of 40 °C. The residual water was removed by lyophilizer (operon, Korea vacuum limited, Korea) at −44 °C. The extract was dark green lustrous gummy substance. After drying, a total of 27.32 g of dry extract was collected. The extract was stored in tightly closed bottle container in a refrigerator at −20 °C until used [11 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction and Analysis of Biological Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normal isotonic saline (Euro-med Laboratories, Philippines), n-hexane, 2% tween 80, ethyl acetate (Loba chemicals, India), chloroform (Atico, India), citrate dextrose (Deluxe Scientific Surgico, India), Giemsa (Science Lab, USA), ethanol (Nice chemicals, India), Electrical balance, 1 mL syringes, needles, vials, examination glove, permanent marker, Whatman filters paper No.1 (Whatman ®, England), collecting flask, separatory funnel, hematocrit centrifuge, Micro-Hematocrit Reader, microscope, laboratory glasswares, and lyophilizer (Labfreez, China) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Methanol Extraction of Stem Bark

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fresh stem bark was washed so as to remove dead materials and allowed to dry for three weeks under a shade. The dried stem bark was then pulverized by using a grinder. The powdered stem bark (1.52 Kg) was macerated in 80% methanol for 72 hrs in maceration jars, extraction was aided by orbital shaker and intermittent stirring. The extract was first filtered using a muslin cloth and then by Whatman filters paper No.1. For exhaustive extraction of the plant material, the residue was re-macerated for another 72 hrs twice and then filtered. The combined filtrates were dried in an oven dryer at a temperature of 40°C and weighed. Then, the dried extract (crude extract) was kept in a tightly closed amber bottle and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction and Yield Quantification of G. lotoides Seeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly collected matured seeds of G. lotoides were thoroughly washed with tap water to eliminate any contaminants. After complete drying of the sample sunshade, it was pulverized by an electrical grinder. The dry powdered seeds of G. lotoides were subjected to extraction employing. One kg sample was soaked in a total of 5.7 litter of 80% hydromethanol with continuous shaking employing automatic shaker (Stuart Scientific) at 120 rpm at room temperature for 72 h. Then, the solution was primarily filtered employing muslin cloth and then refiltered with Whatman filters paper No.1. The marc was re-soaked with the same volume of solvents twice. Then subsequent filtrates were dried in to solid mass in a rotary evaporator (YAMATO rotary evaporator RE301, Japan, 40 °C, 60 rpm). The concentrated filtrate was subjected to deep freezer (DN-86W258) and then freeze-dried in a lyophilizer (Labfreeze Instruments Group Co., Ltd., Japan) at −50 °C. Ultimately, the %yield of extract was computed and kept at −4 °C using sealed container for experimentation [26 (link)].
The percentage yield of the rude extract %Yield= Seed extract weight obtained(g) Seed powder employed as stock×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction and Fractionation of Ficus hurdwarica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
F. hurdwarica whole plant was collected, dried under shade, and then grossly powdered by a mechanical grinder. The powdered plant was weighed (1 Kg) and extracted with 80% methanol by direct maceration and allowed to stand for 3-4 days (David et al., 2017) . The mixture was filtered after 72 h of maceration using a muslin cloth and then by Whatman filters paper No. 1. The filtrates were collected and the solvent was vaporized using a rotary evaporator (Heidolph Laborota 4000, Germany) at 40-50 °C. The dried extract was conveyed into a vial and preserved in a refrigerator until utilization (Mbiri et al., 2016) (link). Solvent fractions were then prepared by liquidliquid separation method. Thirty grams of the crude
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Whatman filters paper no 1 »