The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using p hydroxybenzaldehyde

1

Synthesis and Characterization of PAAP/GCE Sensor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4,4`-oxo-bis(4``-aminophenylene) from (95%, BDH) was used without purification. 4-bromobenzaldehyde and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde from (95% & 97%, Fluka) and also were used without purification. Cyclohexanone, cyclopentanone, p-hydroxy benzaldehyde and vanillene from (99%, 99%, 98% and 95%, Merck). Anhydrous potassium carbonate from (Aldrich). DMSO analytical grade (99%, Sigma Aldrich). All other reagents used were of high purity and were further purified as reported in literature [50]. Analytical grade of Al2(SO4)3, AuCl3, AsCl3, Ba(NO3)2, CaCl2, CdSO4, Ce(NO3)2, Co(NO3)2, MgCl2, SbCl3, SnCl2, YNO3, ZnSO4, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4, and nafion (5% ethanolic solution) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, and used without further purification. Stock solution of As3+ ions solution (1.0 M) was prepared from the purchased chemicals. I-V method was conducted to detect As3+ ion at a selective point using the fabricated PAAP/GCE by Keithley electrometer (6517A, USA). [Caution! Arsenic is toxic. Only a small amount of this material had been used to prepare the required solution and handled with care.]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation of Arsenic(III) Stock Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment utilized chemicals procured from trading vendors without any further refinement. The special chemicals and their corresponding providers included: p-phenylenediamine sulfonic acid (DB-SO3H) sourced from Sigma-Aldrich (with a purity of at least 97.0 %), glacial CH3COOH also from Sigma-Aldrich (with a purity of at least 99 %), 1,4-dioxacyclohexane obtained from Merck, C2H5OH procured from Alfa Aesar (with a purity between 94 and 96 %), 2-propanone from Alfa Aesar (with a purity of 99.5 %), and HNO3 also from Alfa Aesar. Trichlorotriazine and p-hydroxy benzaldehyde were acquired from Merck. All mixtures were formulated using water that had been deionized. The creation of As(III) stock solutions involved the dissolution of NaAsO2 salt in deionized water. To modify the pH of the solution as required, HNO3 and NaOH, both with a concentration of 0.1 mol/L, were utilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPTLC Analysis of Ferulic Acid Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPTLC was accomplished according to a modified version of the methodology published by Paillat, et al., [51 (link)]. At the beginning volumes of standard solutions of ferulic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (PHB), p-hydroxybenzoic acid (APHB), p-cresol, p-creosol, and vanillic acid (722820, 54590, 54630, 61030, 41340, and 68654, Sigma-Aldrich, Química S.A. de C.V.) were applied at a concentration of 3 mg/mL. After that, were applied 15 μL of AV, AV-TNDF, AP, AP-TNDF and the kinetic fermentation samples (AVF4, AVF8, AVF24 and APF4, APF8, APF24) at a concentration of 12.5 mg/mL. Samples were placed on TLC silica gel 60 F254 plates (E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using an ATS 4 TLC sampler (CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland) at a constant application rate of 120 nL s−1 and developed in a CAMAG automated developing chamber ADC2 (47% moisture) saturated and preconditioned for 5 min to a 50-mm distance with an n-hexane: chloroform:methanol:acetic acid solvent system (5:36:4:0.5 v/v/v/v). Plates were scanned at 254 nm and 366 nm in a CAMAG TLC III scanner (slit size 4 mm × 0.3 mm) at a scanning speed of 10 mm s−1 and a data step resolution of 50 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analytical Methodology for Diverse Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Caffeine was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Fluoranthene, ibuprofen, p‐hydroxybenzaldehyde, p‐coumaric acid, 3‐methoxycinnamic acid, ferulic acid, sulfanilamide, and diclofenac were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Carbon dioxide of 5.3 purity grade was purchased from Linde (Guildford, UK). Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) used were purchased from VWR (Radnor, Pennsylvania, United States). Milli‐Q water was used in all experiments. The compound concentration in all standard solutions was 50 µg/mL dissolved in both acetonitrile and water (Fluoranthene and ibuprofen in water were not studied because of poor solubility). Approximately 3 mL honey purchased from a local market was extracted with 3 mL acetonitrile and spiked with sulfanilamide to 500 ng/mL. Ground water sample was collected from a small lake near the lab, filtrated and then spiked with diclofenac to 1 µg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lignin-Derived Phenolics in Fermentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five typical lignin-derived phenolics including vanillin, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and ferulic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) were considered in this study. All these phenolics were added in the fermentation medium before pH adjustment and the dosage was adjusted according to the requirements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Phenolic Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC grade methanol, ethanol, and acetonitrile were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Standards of phenolic compounds, including, quinic acid, caffeic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, ferulic acid, arbutin, adenosine, tachioside, vanillic alcohol, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, p-coumaric acid, coniferol, syringaldehyde, acetovanillone, sinapic acid, coniferylaldehyde, sinapaldehyde, syringaresinol, and balanophonin; standards of furfural (FF) and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA) with purity ≥ 98%. Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) reagent, 2,2-di(4-tert-octylphenyl)-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) were provided by Yuanye (Shanghai, China). FRAP test kit was purchased from Solibao (Beijing, China). Other chemicals (analytical grade) were supplied by Sinopharm (Beijing, China). Purified water was obtained using a PALL Lab Water Purification System (Port Washington, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Lignin-Derived Phenols Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lignin phenols (vanillin, acetovanillone, syringaldehyde, acetosyringone, vanillic acid, p‐hydroxybenzaldehyde, p‐hydroxyacetophenone, syringic acid, ferulic acid, p‐hydroxybenzoic acid, p‐coumaric acid), ethylvanillin, CuO, and Fe(NH4)2(SO4)3•6H2O were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Humic acid was obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid (37%) were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Methanol and 2‐propanol were obtained from Scharlau (Barcelona, Spain). Ethyl acetate was obtained from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Citric acid was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All organic solvents were of HPLC or higher grade. Water from a Milli‐Q Water Purification System (Millipore) with a UV unit was used for solution preparation and washing purpose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Compound Identification in Analyzed Fraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The standards
used for the identification of some of the compounds present in the
analyzed fraction were gallic acid (certified reference material);
5-hydroxymethylfurfural (≥99%); furfural (≥98.5%, GC);
vanillic acid (≥97.0%, HPLC); p-hydroxybenzaldehyde
(95.0%, HPLC); 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (≥99%); syringic acid
(≥95.0%, HPLC); vanillin (≥97%); syringaldehyde (≥98%);
coniferaldehyde (≥98%); and sinapaldehyde (≥98%), all
of which were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO).
The
hydroalcoholic mixtures used for the identifications were made using
99.8% ethanol supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO) and ultrapure
water (EMD-Milipore, Bedford, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenolic Standards Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic standards comprising p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, protocatechuic aldehyde, 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, catechin, quercetin and naringenin, as well as the chemicals 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and fluorescein disodium salt, were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS)-grade methanol, acetic acid, formic acid, LCMS-grade acetonitrile, Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, sodium carbonate, sodium iodide, ethyl acetate, and acetone were procured from Thermo Fisher Scientific (West Palm Beach, FL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Alkaline Nitrobenzene Extraction and HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following methods by (Lopes et al., 2011 (link)), 200 mg of extracted cells were transferred to 5 ml glass tubes with 2 ml 2N NaOH and 200 µl of nitrobenzene, sealed with PTFE caps and heated to 170°C for 3 h. After cooling, excess nitrobenzene was extracted three times with 1-ml ether and the residue acidified with concentrated HCl to pH 2.0. Phenolic compounds were extracted with diethyl ether, dried under nitrogen stream, and re-dissolved in 50% methanol. Separation of phenolics was achieved via a Perkin Elmer Flexar HPLC with a photo diode array detector (PDA). The system was equipped with a Prevail C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5µm particle size, Alltech Assoc., Deerfield, IL) and 10-µl injection volume and eluent of 95% water (pH 2.0 adjusted with acetic acid) and acetonitrile 5% v/v at 1 ml/min. A gradient run was created where acetonitrile was increased from 5% to 15% v/v over 10 min, 20% over 30 min, and to 60% over 40 min. Standards used for identification and quantification included p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, ferulic acid, coumaric acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, and syringaldehyde, all purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!