The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using ventana benchmark immunostainer

1

Immunohistochemical Staining of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining was performed on FFPE tissue sections. Sections were deparaffinized in descending ethanol concentrations and pre-treated as listed in Additional file 10: Supplementary Table 1. After incubation for 1 h at room temperature with the corresponding primary antibodies (Additional file 10: Supplementary Table 1), samples were washed twice with TBS-T (TBS + 0.1% TWEEN-20) and once with TBS for 5 min. After incubation with the corresponding secondary antibody (Additional file 10: Supplementary Table 1) for 30 min at room temperature, antibody binding was visualized using the Vectastain ABC-AP Kit (VectorLabs., Burlingame, CA, USA) and Permanent Red Solution (Dako) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. In some cases, nuclei were counterstained in Mayer’s hemalum solution. For the hCD45 staining, mouse monoclonal anti-CD45 (LCA) (2B11 & PD7/26) was used in a Ventana BenchMark immunostainer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of SEC23A in Thyroid Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-SEC23A immunostaining was performed on 3μm-thick whole tissue sections of 11 MTC FFPE tumors and 13 thyroid follicular tumors (8 papillary carcinomas and 4 follicular carcinomas), using the polyclonal rabbit antibody provided by Abcam (AB137583). Immunostaining was performed with a Ventana® Benchmark immunostainer (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) using the Ventana Ultraview detection kit, following the manufacturer's procedure (CC2© pre-treatment for 60min, antibody dilution at 1:200, incubation at 37°C for 32min, UltraView detection kit© without UltraView Amplification©). Slides were freshly cut less than two weeks before IHC technique and stored at 4°C before use. SEC23A antibody staining was blindly analyzed by three pathologists (S.L, V.H. and E.L).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry analysis of mouse tumors was performed as described previously4 (link)5 (link)27 (link). Briefly, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded 4 μm sections of the xenografts were dewaxed with Ventana EZ Prep and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked using the Ventana’s Universal DAB inhibitor. Primary antibodies against Oct4, PLEC, VIM and TUBB2A were diluted according to the instruction provided by the manufacturer and sections were stained using a Ventana Benchmark Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Arizona, USA). Detection was performed using Ventana’s Ultra View DAB detection kit (Roche/Ventana, Arizona, USA) using the method described previously4 (link). Tumor sections were counter stained with Ventana Haematoxylin and Blueing Solution. Immunohistochemistry images were captured and analysed by using Aperio ImageScope v12.1.0.5029 as described previously27 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tissue Microarray Construction and Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the construction of tissue microarrays (TMA), 1 mm tissue cylinders were extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor samples archived in the department Neuropathology after evaluation and marking of the respective hematoxylin and eosin stains. For most of the cases, enough tissue was available to retrieve two tissue probes. A conventional microarrayer was used (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA). TMAs were cut with a microtome, and 4 μm tissue slices were produced and dried at 80° for 15 min. Immunohistochemical staining was done with a Ventana BenchMark immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA).
Pretreatment with cell conditioning solution CC1 (pH 8.5) was done for 14 (CD68), 40 (MIB1, CD3 and CD163) or 64 min (CD8) followed by primary antibody incubation at 37° (CD8 (ready to use, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and CD163 (1:1000, ABD Serotec, Puchheim, Germany)) or 42 °C (MIB1 (1:200, DAKO, Santa Clara, CA, USA), CD3 (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and CD68 (1:200, Agilent DAKO, Santa Clara, CA, USA)). Subsequently, OptiView HQ universal linker was applied for 12 min, followed by incubation with OptiView HRP Multimer for 12 min. Counterstaining was done with hematoxylin for 4 min.
As controls, the human cerebral and cerebellar cortex, as well as a sample of a colorectal carcinoma metastasis, were placed on each TMA block.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded 4 µm sectioned patient samples and mouse tumour xenografts were stained using a Ventana Benchmark Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Tucson, AZ, USA) as described previously [18 (link),28 (link)]. Tumour sections were de-waxed with Ventana EZ Prep and endogenous peroxidise activity blocked using the Ventana Universal DAB inhibitor. Primary antibodies against p-Src, t-Src, Ki67, CA125, Oct4, CD117 (c-kit), CD133 and CD31 were diluted as per manufacturer’s instructions. The sections were counter-stained with Ventana Haematoxylin and Blueing solution, and primary antibody staining was detected using the ultra-View Universal DAB detection Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Negative controls were prepared by incubating each tumour sections without primary antibodies. Immunohistochemistry images were taken using an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DAB staining (5× 200 µm images/section) was quantified using processing packages in ImageJ (positive pixels or number of positive cells) and Aperio (strong positive staining pixel count). Quantification was standardised to area and normalised to the negative control sections. Results displayed as mean ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tissue Microarray-based Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Archived formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples were used for the extraction of two biopsy punches of 2 mm diameter each to construct tissue microarrays with a conventional tissue microarrayer (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA). Tumor cylinder extraction was done after evaluation of H&E slides for suitable areas. The newly formed tissue blocks were cut into 4 μm slices with a microtome. After subsequent drying at 80°C for 15 min, subsequent immunohistochemical staining for H3K27me3 (1:200, rabbit monoclonal antibody C36B11, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and EZH2 (1:100, rabbit monoclonal antibody D2C9, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) were done with a Ventana BenchMark immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). Analysis of immunohistochemical staining were scored independently by two pathologists.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemistry Analysis of Mouse Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hemotaxylin & Eosin (H & E) staining of mouse organs and tumors was performed by the staff at the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory Services at The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia according to the standard H&E protocol [57 (link)]. Immunohistochemistry analysis of mouse tumors was performed on formalin fixed, paraffin embedded 4 μm sections of the xenografts and were stained using a Ventana Benchmark Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Arizona, USA) as described previously [3 (link), 20 (link)]. Negative controls were prepared by incubating each tumor section without primary antibodies. Sections of human breast tissue, high-grade ovarian tumors and human tonsils were used as positive controls to determine the staining efficacy of primary antibodies. Immunohistochemistry images were taken using an Aperio ImageScope (Leica Microsystems, Mt Waverly, Australia) with the associated digital pathology viewing software. DAB staining was measured using the open source image processing package Fiji (https://fiji.sc/) with a plug-in developed to recognize DAB staining for 10 randomly captured images per section. DAB staining intensity of the negative control was subtracted from the DAB staining of the antibody of interest to get a measure of DAB staining of interest.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemistry Staining of Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded 4 μm sections of the xenografts were stained using a Ventana Benchmark Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Arizona, USA) previously [45 (link)]. Immunohistochemistry images were taken using Axioskop 2 microscope, captured using a Nikon DXM1200C digital camera and processed using NIS-Elements F3.0 software. Images were scored independently by four reviewers blind to the molecular data as previously described [46 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

MBOAT7 Immunostaining in Chronic Hepatitis C

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining for MBOAT7 was performed on liver biopsies of CHC patients. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded 4 μm sections were stained using a Ventana Benchmark Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Arizona, USA). Slides were incubated with a dilution of 1:10 of rabbit polyclonal antibody (Ab) specific for Human MBOAT7 (SIGMA ALDRICH). Negative controls where the primary antibody was excluded confirmed the specificity of immunostaining. Detection was performed using Ventana's Ultra View DAB kit (Roche/Ventana 05269806001). The pathologist (D.M.) evaluated the MBOAT7 immunostaining semi-quantitatively in a blinded fashion regarding any of the histological and clinical characteristics of the patients. The extent of staining was scored according to its amount and intensity using a 4-point scoring system as follows: 0=no staining; 1=positive staining in <33% of cells; 2=33–66% of positive cells; and 3=positive staining in more than 66% of cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of COX2 and MIB1 in Tissue Microarrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Available data from immunohistochemical staining for COX2 and MIB1 according to our prior study were used [1 (link)]. Tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed with 2 representative 1 mm tissue probes for each tumor using a conventional microarrayer (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, USA). With microtomy 4 μm slices were produced and dried at 80° for 15 min. A Ventana BenchMark immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, Arizona, USA) was used for immunohistochemical staining of COX2 (1:800, Biozol, Eching, Germany). Quantification was done by semiquantitative assessment and formulation of an intensity distribution score (ID-score): 0 = 0–5%, 1 = 5–25%, 2 = 25–50%, 3 = 50–75%, 4 = 75–100%). MIB1 expression was analyzed via quantification on digitalized whole section stainings that were done within the routine neuropathological workup.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!