The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3730xl genetic analyzer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The 3730xl Genetic Analyzer is a capillary electrophoresis (CE) system designed for high-throughput DNA sequencing and fragment analysis. It features a 96-capillary array and can perform up to 96 samples simultaneously. The system is capable of analyzing a wide range of DNA fragment sizes and is suitable for a variety of applications, including genetic research, forensics, and diagnostic testing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

146 protocols using 3730xl genetic analyzer

1

Y-chromosomal Genetic Profiling for Ancestry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood samples using the DP-318 Kit (Tiangen Biotechnology, Beijing, China), and the DNA extraction protocol for the saliva samples was adapted from the high-salt DNA extraction method (Quinque et al. 2006 (link)). The samples were typed as the most recent Y-chromosome phylogenetic tree (ISOGG 2017 ). The selected samples belonged to several subclades of haplogroup Q.
Binary markers were hierarchically genotyped by SNaPshot (ABI SNaPshot Multiplex Kit, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and fluorescent allele-specific PCR. The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Seventeen Y-chromosomal STRs (DYS19, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS385a, DYS385b, DYS438, DYS439, DYS437, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635 and YGATAH4) were amplified using the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR amplification kit (Applied Biosystems). The amplified products were separated and identified using a 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. The data were analyzed using a Gene-Mapper ID v3.2 (Applied Biosystems). In the analyses, DYS389II was calculated by subtracting the DYS389I allele size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA Extraction and STR Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted by a DNA extraction kit (AP-EMN-BL-GDNA-250, Corning). Twenty STRs including the Amelogenin locus were amplified by six multiplex PCR and separated on an ABI 3730XL Genetic Analyzer. The signals were then analyzed by the software GeneMapper.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validation of Disease-Causing Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each putative disease-causing mutation was validated by Sanger sequencing. Primer3 was used to design a pair of primers to generate amplicons that cover 500 bp region around the mutation site. The PCR amplicons were Sanger sequenced on an ABI 3730XL Genetic Analyzer. The results were analyzed by Sequencher 5.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gene Sequencing and Prediction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amplified genes from six varieties were subjected to bidirectional Sanger sequencing with gene-specific primers on an ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer using a BDT v3.1 Cycle sequencing kit. The reverse primer nucleotide sequence was converted into a reverse complementary sequence. A consensus sequence was created by identifying an overlapping sequence between forward and reverse complementary sequences. The GT 104 consensus sequence was used as a query sequence in NCBI-BLASTn analysis [34 (link)]. Furthermore, to determine sequence polymorphism, all sequences were subjected to CLUSTALW multiple sequence alignment [35 ]. For gene prediction, Eukaryotic GeneMark.hmm version 3.54 [36 (link)] was used to locate exons and introns in sequences of reasonable length. Open reading frames (ORFs) of all six varieties were created by joining all exons and then translated to predict protein sequences with BioEdit [35 ]. These sequences have been submitted to the NCBI under the accession numbers ON711024 to ON711029 (Supplementary Material).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Variant Calling and Pathogenicity Prediction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Trimmomatic was used to remove adapter contamination and trim low-quality reads to obtain clean reads (15 (link)). Then, the cleaned reads were aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) using the Burrows–Wheeler Alignment tool (16 (link)). DNA variants were called following the Genome Analysis Toolkit software best practices (17 (link)). Then, variants were annotated using Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) (18 (link)–22 (link)). Multiple computational predictive tools were applied to predict the pathogenicity of the detected variants (23 (link)–29 (link)). Further, variants with an allele frequency (AF) of <0.1% were retained for downstream analysis. According to the ACMG/AMP guidelines, all retained variants were classified into pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), variants with unknown clinical significance (VUS), likely benign (LB), or benign (B) (30 (link)). The putative diagnostic variants were experimentally validated by Sanger sequencing (ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer) and real-time PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA was extracted from the bacteria according to Sambrook [12 ]. Amplification of 16S rRNA gene was carried out by PCR (Eppendorf) using universal eubacterial primer set 63 F 5′-CAG GCC TAA CAC ATG CAA GTC-3′, 1387R 5′-GGG CGG AGT GTA CAA GGC-3′. Forward and reverse DNA sequencing reactions of PCR amplicon were carried out with 63 F and 1387R primers using BDT v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit on ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer. The homology of 16S rRNA gene sequence was aligned using BLAST program of the GenBank database (NCBI) and aligned to their nearest-neighbor sequences. A Phylogenetic tree was derived from sequences of 16S rRNA gene sequences using neighbor-joining method in MEGA X
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fecal DNA Extraction and Microsatellite Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic DNA was extracted from fecal samples using QIAamp DNA stool mini kits (Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. We used seven tetra‐microsatellite loci to distinguish among individuals. These were as follows: GPL‐60, gpz‐20, GPL‐29, gpz‐6, GPL‐53, GPL‐44, and gpz‐47 (Huang et al., 2015). The probability of identity across these loci in the target population was estimated using GIMLET 1.3.3 (Valière, 2002). PCR amplifications were carried out in 25 μl reaction mixtures comprising approximately 50 ng of template DNA, 2 mm MgCl2, 200 μmol of dNTP each, 15 pmol of each primer, 1.0 μg of bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.3 units of Hotstart DNA polymerase (Takara). Amplifications were performed using the following PCR procedure: an initial denaturation step for 5 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 30 s at locus‐specific annealing temperature and 50 s at 72°C,and a final elongation for 10 min at 72°C. For genotyping, the PCR amplification products were separated by capillary electrophoresis using a denaturing acrylamide gel matrix on an ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer. Alleles were detected using Genemapper 3.2 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Extraction and COL4A5 Gene Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of Alport syndrome fibroblasts and iPSCs were extracted using the Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Cat NO. A1120). Exons 47, 26, and 10 of the COL4A5 gene were amplified by PCR. Three pairs of primers were used. COL4A5 Exon 47 forward primer: 5'-TGTTTTGTCAATATCCATAAGAGTGG-3'; COL4A5 Exon 47 reverse primer: 5'-GGCCAAGGCTACTCTAGAACC-3'; COL4A5 Exon 26 forward primer: 5'-GGGTGGATCATCCTTATTCG-3'; COL4A5 Exon 26 reverse primer: 5'-CAGCAAGCCAACATCACG-3'; COL4A5 Exon 10 forward primer: 5'-AGAGCAGAATTCCAATGACG-3'; and COL4A5 Exon 10 reverse primer: 5'-TTATGAAGCCCTGCTTTTGC-3'. The PCR products were subsequently sequenced with an ABI 3730XL Genetic Analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Assessing MHC Integrity in MM Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Integrity of the MHC in genomic DNA (gDNA) from MM cells recovered from the xenografted mice in all treatment groups was assessed by LOH analysis with previously defined STR markers mapping to chromosomes 6 and 15.48 (link) Multiplex PCR amplification was performed using Multiplex PCR kit (QIAGEN). Each 20 μL reaction contained 1.2 μL of gDNA, 2 μL of Primer Mix (final concentration 5 mM each primer), 10 μL of 2× Multiplex master mix, and 2 μL of 5× Q solution. Tagged primer combinations included: Mix 1: D6S105 [6-FAM]; D6S276 [TET]; Mix 2: D6S291 [6-FAM]-D6S273 [TET]; Mix 3: D15S209 [6-FAM] D6S311 [6-FAM]; Mix 4: D6S126 [6-FAM] D6S275 [6-FAM]. The D6S1618 [TET] marker was evaluated alone. Amplification of STR loci was performed on the Mastercycler ProS (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) using a thermal cycling profile of 95°C for 15 min; 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 40 sec, 72°C for 45 sec; and 72°C for 10 minutes. Aliquots of each PCR reaction were diluted 1:100 and the products were separated on an ABI-3730xl Genetic Analyzer and quantitated using GeneMapper® v4 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microsatellite-based Genotyping of Fungal Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A selection of environmental and clinical strains were analyzed by microsatellite polymorphism genotyping using three multiplex PCRs. A total of nine microsatellite markers consisting of di-, tri-, or tetranucleotide short tandem repeats (STR) were used [56 (link)]. Fungal DNA extraction was performed by freeze-drying the cultures and mechanically breaking the cells by bead-beating. DNA was then extracted using the ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Genotyping was performed by Genoscreen (Lille, France) using the PCR conditions described by De Valk et al. [56 (link)] with the fluorophores 6FAM/HEX/NED. The size of the amplicons was determined with a ABI 3730XL genetic analyzer using the GeneScan 500 ROX size standard (ABI) and the GeneMapper v5.0 software. The size of each microsatellite fragment was measured to determine the number of repetitions for each marker according to de Valk et al. [56 (link)]. All results are reported as repeat numbers. The relatedness of the strains was estimated by a minimum spanning tree analysis in Bionumerics 8.0 (Applied Maths, St-Martens-Latem, Belgium). The discriminatory power of the microsatellite markers was calculated using the Simpson index of diversity (Hunter 1990).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!