The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Grip strength meter

Manufactured by Columbus Instruments
Sourced in United States

The grip strength meter is a device designed to measure the force exerted by an individual's hand and forearm muscles. It is used to assess and quantify grip strength, which is an important measure of overall muscle strength and function.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

163 protocols using grip strength meter

1

Murine Grip Strength Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were held by the tail and allowed to grasp a triangular bar attached to a grip strength meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, United States) with their forearm paws. The mouse was pulled via the tail in a parallel, opposite direction away from the force meter until the bar was released, and the peak force generated was recorded. Data presented represent an average of three trials per mouse with at least 5 min of rest between trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exercise Training Protocol for Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HSALR and WT mice were split into either sedentary or exercise groups. Exercise groups completed a treadmill exercise training protocol 5 days per week at a 15-degree incline. Animals were placed in the treadmill at rest for 10 min to acclimate followed by 5 min at 6 m/min and then put through a progressive endurance training protocol. In week 1, animals ran at 12 m/min, 720 m total distance; weeks 2–4, 14 m/min, 840 m total distance; weeks 5 and 6, 16 m/min, 980 m total distance; week 7 and 8, 18 m/min, 1080 m total and weeks 9 and 10, animals ran at 20 m/min, totaling 1200 m. Maximum distance run on exhaustive treadmill was measured at weeks 1 and 10 and was determined after 10 min of acclimation at a speed of 6 m/min. The speed was increased by 2 m/min every 2 min until exhaustion defined as the mouse stepping off of the treadmill and standing on an electric shock grid for 5 s. A grip strength meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH) was used to measure forelimb and all limb grip strength at weeks 1 and 10. As the mouse grasped the bar, the peak pull force in grams was recorded on a digital force transducer. Grip force was standardized to body weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Forelimb and Hindlimb Grip Strength Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forelimb and hindlimb grip strength were assessed in 7-8 month old female mice using a grip strength meter as previously described (Spurney et al., 2009 ) (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA). Mice were acclimated for three consecutive days prior to measurement. An average of five replicates for forelimb and hindlimb was taken for each animal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Forelimb and Hindlimb Grip Strength Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forelimb and hindlimb grip strength were assessed in 7-8 month old female mice using a grip strength meter as previously described (Spurney et al., 2009 ) (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA). Mice were acclimated for three consecutive days prior to measurement. An average of five replicates for forelimb and hindlimb was taken for each animal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Neuromuscular Function Assessment via Grip Strength

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grip strength meter (Columbus, USA) was employed for assessing neuromuscular function by sensing and recording the peak amount of force, the test animal applies in grasping specially designed pull bar assemblies. It consists of grid made up of steel wire measuring 76 × 250 mm and divided into rectangles of equal size providing a reliable surface for forelimb grip. This grasping device or platform was connected to dual sensor model located at a height of 9.5 cm, attached to a computer interface for measuring and saving the recorded data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Grip Strength in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grip strength of all four limbs was measured using a grip-strength meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). The animal was held so that all four limbs paws grasped the specially designed mouse flat mesh assembly and the mouse was pulled back until their grip was broken. The force transducer retained the peak force reached when the animal's grip was broken, and this was recorded from a digital display. Five successful grip strength measurements within 2 min were recorded. The maximum values were used for analysis. The mice were trained on the grip strength meter before the trial. Maximal muscle strength was obtained as values of KGF (kilogram-force) and represented in grams.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Neurobehavioral Phenotyping of Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forelimb and hindlimb grip strength were measured using a grip strength meter (Columbus Instruments) at 60 days of age. Each session consisted of the average of three tests per animal. Rotarod device (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA) was used to measure motor function and balance at P60. Each session consisted of the average of three trials on the elevated accelerating rotarod beginning at 5 RPM, measuring the time the mouse was able to remain on the rod. At P60, animals were tested in an open field analysis (San Diego Instruments, San Diego, CA, USA). Animals were given several minutes to adapt to the testing chamber before the beginning of testing. Open field data was digitally recorded for 30 min and subsequently analyzed by Noldus Ethovision tracking software [13 (link)]. Beam breaks were recorded in the x, y, and z planes and averaged across groups. N = 25 animals/group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Grip Strength and Rotarod Assessment in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We utilized a grip strength meter (Columbus Instruments, OH, USA) to assess grip strength. On the 16th day of treatment, we acclimatized mice to the procedure room for 15 minutes and measured grip strength as per manufacturer's instructions. We recorded the peak force produced by mouse grip and utilized the average value of three measurements within 2 minutes for analysis. We evaluated coordination and body mobility of mice by rotarod test (Rotamex-5, Columbus Instruments, OH, USA). After 15 minutes of acclimatization in the procedure room, we placed mice on rotarod, which was rotating at a speed of 3 rpm. The speed was increased regularly by 1 rpm per 10 seconds. Latency to fall on paper-cushion was recorded. The test was repeated twice after 10-minute intervals. The average time of all the three trials was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mice Grip Strength Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were acclimated to forelimb and hindlimb grip strength testing 3 consecutive times during the week prior to the first experimental measurement. Forelimb and hindlimb grip strength were measured on Day 113 with the Columbus Instruments Grip Strength Meter (Columbus, OH, USA). All practice and experimental measurements on the Grip Strength Meter were taken in triplicate, with at least one minute of rest between each measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Forelimb and Hindlimb Grip Strength Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forelimb and Hindlimb grip strength was assessed using a grip strength meter (Columbus Instruments) daily for 5 consecutive days according to Treat NMD protocols (DMD_M.2.2.001), with data interpreted as averaged maximum daily values. Two-limb wire hang and four-limb grid hang tests were performed in accordance with Treat NMD protocols (DMD_M.2.1.005). For two-limb wire hang, a wire hanger was suspended placed ∼35cm above a cage with soft bedding. Mice were hung using only their forelimbs; however, they were allowed to swing and hang with all four limbs if able. Hang time was recorded, with 600 seconds used as a cutoff. For four-limb grid hang tests the same parameters were used (35cm elevation, 600 second cutoff), but mice instead hung upside down from a handmade box covered in wire mesh (1x1cm grid).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!